Stage-specific predictors of exercise adherence after percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective multicenter study.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Chengyu Xia, Liuxia Ji, Hao Guo, Yuheng Du, Yingjun Zheng, Hui Liu
{"title":"Stage-specific predictors of exercise adherence after percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective multicenter study.","authors":"Chengyu Xia, Liuxia Ji, Hao Guo, Yuheng Du, Yingjun Zheng, Hui Liu","doi":"10.1186/s12872-026-06291-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of exercise after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) is compromised by poor long-term adherence. Although multiple influencing factors are recognized, their dynamic evolution and relative importance across different stages remain unclear, hindering the development of targeted interventions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize longitudinal patterns of exercise adherence and identify stage-specific predictors within 6 months post-PCI using machine learning (ML).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective longitudinal study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>600 post-PCI patients were assessed at baseline (T0), 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3) after discharge. We developed concurrent-model and longitudinal prediction models using Random Forest, LightGBM, and Lasso Regression, with interpretability enabled by feature importance analysis and Partial Dependence Plots. A tiered benchmarking strategy, including a linear model trained on the full feature set, was employed to isolate the added value of ML algorithms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exercise adherence showed significant longitudinal changes, remaining stable from T0 to T1, sharply declining at T2, and partially recovering at T3. All ML models performed well, with concurrent-model R² values ranging from 0.503 to 0.745 and longitudinal R² values ranging from 0.5 to 0.723, and substantially outperforming linear benchmarks. Feature importance analysis revealed a dynamic evolution of stage-specific predictors: action self-efficacy and kinesiophobia dominated the initiation phase (T0), while maintenance self-efficacy and coping planning became the paramount predictors thereafter. Critically, the level of maintenance self-efficacy at T1 served as a strong and consistent prospective predictor and was associated with long-term adherence at T2 and T3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that exercise adherence after PCI follows a dynamic trajectory, with the relative predictive relevance of psychological and behavioral factors varying across stages. The shift from initiation-related predictors to maintenance-focused predictors, together with the sustained predictive association of early maintenance self-efficacy, may inform the development of phased assessment and intervention strategies. However, these findings should be interpreted as predictive associations rather than causal mechanisms and require external validation before clinical implementation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not applicable as a clinical trial. This study was a prospective observational cohort study without investigator-assigned intervention allocation and was not prospectively registered.</p>","PeriodicalId":9195,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13663279/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-026-06291-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of exercise after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) is compromised by poor long-term adherence. Although multiple influencing factors are recognized, their dynamic evolution and relative importance across different stages remain unclear, hindering the development of targeted interventions.

Objective: To characterize longitudinal patterns of exercise adherence and identify stage-specific predictors within 6 months post-PCI using machine learning (ML).

Design: A prospective longitudinal study.

Methods: 600 post-PCI patients were assessed at baseline (T0), 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3) after discharge. We developed concurrent-model and longitudinal prediction models using Random Forest, LightGBM, and Lasso Regression, with interpretability enabled by feature importance analysis and Partial Dependence Plots. A tiered benchmarking strategy, including a linear model trained on the full feature set, was employed to isolate the added value of ML algorithms.

Results: Exercise adherence showed significant longitudinal changes, remaining stable from T0 to T1, sharply declining at T2, and partially recovering at T3. All ML models performed well, with concurrent-model R² values ranging from 0.503 to 0.745 and longitudinal R² values ranging from 0.5 to 0.723, and substantially outperforming linear benchmarks. Feature importance analysis revealed a dynamic evolution of stage-specific predictors: action self-efficacy and kinesiophobia dominated the initiation phase (T0), while maintenance self-efficacy and coping planning became the paramount predictors thereafter. Critically, the level of maintenance self-efficacy at T1 served as a strong and consistent prospective predictor and was associated with long-term adherence at T2 and T3.

Conclusions: This study suggests that exercise adherence after PCI follows a dynamic trajectory, with the relative predictive relevance of psychological and behavioral factors varying across stages. The shift from initiation-related predictors to maintenance-focused predictors, together with the sustained predictive association of early maintenance self-efficacy, may inform the development of phased assessment and intervention strategies. However, these findings should be interpreted as predictive associations rather than causal mechanisms and require external validation before clinical implementation.

Trial registration: Not applicable as a clinical trial. This study was a prospective observational cohort study without investigator-assigned intervention allocation and was not prospectively registered.

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后运动依从性的阶段特异性预测因素:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
背景:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后运动的疗效受到长期依从性差的影响。虽然认识到多种影响因素,但它们在不同阶段的动态演变和相对重要性仍不清楚,阻碍了有针对性干预措施的发展。目的:利用机器学习(ML)表征运动依从性的纵向模式,并确定pci术后6个月内特定阶段的预测因素。设计:前瞻性纵向研究。方法:对600例pci术后患者在出院后基线(T0)、1个月(T1)、3个月(T2)和6个月(T3)进行评估。我们使用随机森林、LightGBM和Lasso回归开发了并发模型和纵向预测模型,并通过特征重要性分析和部分依赖图实现了可解释性。采用分层基准测试策略,包括在完整特征集上训练的线性模型,以隔离ML算法的附加价值。结果:运动依从性表现出明显的纵向变化,从T0到T1保持稳定,在T2时急剧下降,在T3时部分恢复。所有ML模型都表现良好,并发模型的R²值在0.503到0.745之间,纵向R²值在0.5到0.723之间,大大优于线性基准。特征重要性分析揭示了阶段特异性预测因子的动态演变:行动自我效能和运动恐惧在启动阶段(T0)占主导地位,之后维持自我效能和应对计划成为最重要的预测因子。关键的是,T1的维持自我效能水平是一个强有力的、一致的前瞻性预测指标,并与T2和T3的长期依从性相关。结论:本研究提示PCI术后的运动依从性遵循动态轨迹,不同阶段的心理和行为因素具有相对的预测相关性。从开始相关的预测因子到以维持为中心的预测因子的转变,以及早期维持自我效能的持续预测关联,可能会为阶段性评估和干预策略的发展提供信息。然而,这些发现应该被解释为预测关联而不是因果机制,在临床实施之前需要外部验证。试验注册:不适用于临床试验。本研究是一项前瞻性观察队列研究,没有研究者分配干预措施,也没有前瞻性登记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
480
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the heart and circulatory system, as well as related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology, epidemiology, and controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书