Digital Twin-Augmented Multifeature Fusion Ensemble for Accurate and Uncertain PV Power Forecasting

IF 4.6 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Majdi Mansouri;Abdelmalek Kouadri;Rami Al-Hmouz;Abdullah Al-Badi;Abdulnasir Hossen
{"title":"Digital Twin-Augmented Multifeature Fusion Ensemble for Accurate and Uncertain PV Power Forecasting","authors":"Majdi Mansouri;Abdelmalek Kouadri;Rami Al-Hmouz;Abdullah Al-Badi;Abdulnasir Hossen","doi":"10.1109/OJIES.2026.3706363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a short-term (1-h ahead) physics-guided multirepresentation feature fusion framework for photovoltaic (PV) power prediction with uncertainty quantification based on quantile regression for interval forecasting. The proposed hybrid methodology integrates feature-representation fusion, deep learning architectures, including long short-term memory (LSTM) and gated recurrent unit (GRU), and machine learning models, such as support vector regression (SVR) and random forest (RF), along with dimensionality reduction techniques, namely principal component analysis (PCA) and autoencoder (AE), and a fully defined physics-based digital twin (DT) model with explicit irradiance-to-power equations and parameter calibration. The DT residual, computed causally using only training data, is incorporated as a physics-informed feature to capture unmodeled nonlinearities. PIs are learned using the pinball (quantile) loss function, replacing heuristic assumptions, and feature-representation fusion reduces uncertainty while enhancing robustness. Validation on real meteorological datasets from Izki and Manah stations (2017–2023) shows that conventional feature sets achieve root mean squared error (RMSE) values between 0.14–0.17 with coefficient of determination (<inline-formula><tex-math>$R^{2}$</tex-math></inline-formula>) ranging from 0.47–0.61. Incorporating DT residuals significantly improves performance, while maintaining realistic generalization performance, with LSTM achieving RMSE <inline-formula><tex-math>$\\approx$</tex-math></inline-formula> 0.0105 and <inline-formula><tex-math>$R^{2}$</tex-math></inline-formula> up to 0.9979. SVR and RF models also benefit, achieving RMSE <inline-formula><tex-math>$\\leq 0.0525$</tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math>$R^{2} \\geq 0.9467$</tex-math></inline-formula>. Comprehensive evaluation including ensemble comparisons, ablation studies, and uncertainty metrics, namely prediction interval coverage probability and mean prediction interval width, confirms high coverage and sharpness, while feature-representation fusion ensures consistent, low-uncertainty predictions. Further experiments on a physically inspired synthetic dataset with explicitly defined generation process and temporal resolution of 1000 samples demonstrate similar trends. Using DT residual features, LSTM and GRU achieve <inline-formula><tex-math>$R^{2} &gt; 0.998$</tex-math></inline-formula> with RMSE <inline-formula><tex-math>$\\approx 0.042$</tex-math></inline-formula>, while RF reaches <inline-formula><tex-math>$R^{2} = 0.897$</tex-math></inline-formula> and a relatively higher RMSE <inline-formula><tex-math>$\\approx 0.326$</tex-math></inline-formula>. PCA and AE representations improve computational efficiency but provide comparatively lower predictive accuracy. Direct comparison between individual models and the proposed ensemble highlights the robustness and stability of the fusion strategy, particularly in high-noise conditions. In summary, the framework offers a reproducible, physically grounded, and uncertainty-aware solution for next-generation solar energy forecasting, explicitly quantifying prediction uncertainty and leveraging physics-informed residuals to enhance predictive reliability and interpretability across both real and synthetic scenarios.","PeriodicalId":52675,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Open Journal of the Industrial Electronics Society","volume":"7 ","pages":"1037-1050"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11575094","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Open Journal of the Industrial Electronics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11575094/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents a short-term (1-h ahead) physics-guided multirepresentation feature fusion framework for photovoltaic (PV) power prediction with uncertainty quantification based on quantile regression for interval forecasting. The proposed hybrid methodology integrates feature-representation fusion, deep learning architectures, including long short-term memory (LSTM) and gated recurrent unit (GRU), and machine learning models, such as support vector regression (SVR) and random forest (RF), along with dimensionality reduction techniques, namely principal component analysis (PCA) and autoencoder (AE), and a fully defined physics-based digital twin (DT) model with explicit irradiance-to-power equations and parameter calibration. The DT residual, computed causally using only training data, is incorporated as a physics-informed feature to capture unmodeled nonlinearities. PIs are learned using the pinball (quantile) loss function, replacing heuristic assumptions, and feature-representation fusion reduces uncertainty while enhancing robustness. Validation on real meteorological datasets from Izki and Manah stations (2017–2023) shows that conventional feature sets achieve root mean squared error (RMSE) values between 0.14–0.17 with coefficient of determination ($R^{2}$) ranging from 0.47–0.61. Incorporating DT residuals significantly improves performance, while maintaining realistic generalization performance, with LSTM achieving RMSE $\approx$ 0.0105 and $R^{2}$ up to 0.9979. SVR and RF models also benefit, achieving RMSE $\leq 0.0525$ and $R^{2} \geq 0.9467$. Comprehensive evaluation including ensemble comparisons, ablation studies, and uncertainty metrics, namely prediction interval coverage probability and mean prediction interval width, confirms high coverage and sharpness, while feature-representation fusion ensures consistent, low-uncertainty predictions. Further experiments on a physically inspired synthetic dataset with explicitly defined generation process and temporal resolution of 1000 samples demonstrate similar trends. Using DT residual features, LSTM and GRU achieve $R^{2} > 0.998$ with RMSE $\approx 0.042$, while RF reaches $R^{2} = 0.897$ and a relatively higher RMSE $\approx 0.326$. PCA and AE representations improve computational efficiency but provide comparatively lower predictive accuracy. Direct comparison between individual models and the proposed ensemble highlights the robustness and stability of the fusion strategy, particularly in high-noise conditions. In summary, the framework offers a reproducible, physically grounded, and uncertainty-aware solution for next-generation solar energy forecasting, explicitly quantifying prediction uncertainty and leveraging physics-informed residuals to enhance predictive reliability and interpretability across both real and synthetic scenarios.
数字双增强多特征融合集成用于准确和不确定光伏功率预测
本文提出了一种短期(提前1小时)物理指导的光伏(PV)功率预测多表示特征融合框架,并基于区间预测分位数回归的不确定性量化。提出的混合方法集成了特征表示融合,深度学习架构,包括长短期记忆(LSTM)和门控循环单元(GRU),机器学习模型,如支持向量回归(SVR)和随机森林(RF),以及降维技术,即主成分分析(PCA)和自动编码器(AE)。以及一个完全定义的基于物理的数字孪生(DT)模型,具有明确的辐照功率方程和参数校准。仅使用训练数据进行因果计算的DT残差被合并为物理信息特征,以捕获未建模的非线性。使用弹球(分位数)损失函数来学习pi,取代启发式假设,特征表示融合减少了不确定性,同时增强了鲁棒性。对2017-2023年Izki站和Manah站真实气象数据集的验证表明,传统特征集的均方根误差(RMSE)在0.14-0.17之间,决定系数($R^{2}$)在0.47-0.61之间。结合DT残差显著提高了性能,同时保持了逼真的一般化性能,LSTM的RMSE分别达到$\approx$ 0.0105和$R^{2}$,最高可达0.9979。SVR和RF模型也受益,实现RMSE $\leq 0.0525$和$R^{2} \geq 0.9467$。综合评估包括集合比较、消融研究和不确定性指标,即预测区间覆盖概率和平均预测区间宽度,证实了高覆盖率和清晰度,而特征表示融合确保了一致的低不确定性预测。在具有明确定义的生成过程和1000个样本的时间分辨率的物理启发合成数据集上的进一步实验表明了类似的趋势。利用DT残差特征,LSTM和GRU达到$R^{2} > 0.998$, RMSE为$\approx 0.042$,而RF达到$R^{2} = 0.897$, RMSE相对较高,为$\approx 0.326$。主成分分析和声发射表示提高了计算效率,但预测精度相对较低。将单个模型与所提出的集成进行直接比较,突出了融合策略的鲁棒性和稳定性,特别是在高噪声条件下。总之,该框架为下一代太阳能预测提供了一个可重复的、物理基础的、不确定性感知的解决方案,明确量化预测的不确定性,并利用物理信息残差来提高预测的可靠性和可解释性,无论在真实场景还是合成场景中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Open Journal of the Industrial Electronics Society
IEEE Open Journal of the Industrial Electronics Society ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC-
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
33
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The IEEE Open Journal of the Industrial Electronics Society is dedicated to advancing information-intensive, knowledge-based automation, and digitalization, aiming to enhance various industrial and infrastructural ecosystems including energy, mobility, health, and home/building infrastructure. Encompassing a range of techniques leveraging data and information acquisition, analysis, manipulation, and distribution, the journal strives to achieve greater flexibility, efficiency, effectiveness, reliability, and security within digitalized and networked environments. Our scope provides a platform for discourse and dissemination of the latest developments in numerous research and innovation areas. These include electrical components and systems, smart grids, industrial cyber-physical systems, motion control, robotics and mechatronics, sensors and actuators, factory and building communication and automation, industrial digitalization, flexible and reconfigurable manufacturing, assistant systems, industrial applications of artificial intelligence and data science, as well as the implementation of machine learning, artificial neural networks, and fuzzy logic. Additionally, we explore human factors in digitalized and networked ecosystems. Join us in exploring and shaping the future of industrial electronics and digitalization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书