Model-Free Predictive Controllers for Voltage Source Inverter: A Unified Experimental Benchmarking

IF 3.8 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Filippo Gemma;Jean-Baptiste Jacquier;Giulia Tresca;Jose Rodriguez;Pericle Zanchetta
{"title":"Model-Free Predictive Controllers for Voltage Source Inverter: A Unified Experimental Benchmarking","authors":"Filippo Gemma;Jean-Baptiste Jacquier;Giulia Tresca;Jose Rodriguez;Pericle Zanchetta","doi":"10.1109/OJIA.2026.3700854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents an extensive experimental comparison of different predictive current control strategies applied to a two-level voltage source inverter supplying a resistive–inductive load. All controllers were implemented on the same hardware platform and evaluated under identical operating conditions at a controller sampling frequency of <inline-formula><tex-math>$\\text{20}\\,\\text{kHz}$</tex-math></inline-formula>. The evaluated methods include a conventional model-based (MB) predictive controller, an auto-regressive model with exogenous input and recursive least squares estimation (ARX–RLS), and three first-order ultra-local (UL) formulations: the linear extended state observer, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-based estimator and the extended-affine (EA). Experimental results confirm that the MB achieved the lowest computational time, whereas the ARX–RLS controller attained the lowest total harmonic distortion (THD). The EA-UL method provided the best overall tradeoff between harmonic performance, transient dynamics, and computational effort. The study highlights that model-free-predictive controllers (MF-PC), particularly ARX–RLS and EA-UL, can deliver performance comparable to or better than MB while significantly reducing dependence on system modeling. These findings confirm the potential of MF-PC approaches as efficient and robust solutions for next-generation power electronic converters.","PeriodicalId":100629,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Open Journal of Industry Applications","volume":"7 ","pages":"625-639"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11551985","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Open Journal of Industry Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11551985/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents an extensive experimental comparison of different predictive current control strategies applied to a two-level voltage source inverter supplying a resistive–inductive load. All controllers were implemented on the same hardware platform and evaluated under identical operating conditions at a controller sampling frequency of $\text{20}\,\text{kHz}$. The evaluated methods include a conventional model-based (MB) predictive controller, an auto-regressive model with exogenous input and recursive least squares estimation (ARX–RLS), and three first-order ultra-local (UL) formulations: the linear extended state observer, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-based estimator and the extended-affine (EA). Experimental results confirm that the MB achieved the lowest computational time, whereas the ARX–RLS controller attained the lowest total harmonic distortion (THD). The EA-UL method provided the best overall tradeoff between harmonic performance, transient dynamics, and computational effort. The study highlights that model-free-predictive controllers (MF-PC), particularly ARX–RLS and EA-UL, can deliver performance comparable to or better than MB while significantly reducing dependence on system modeling. These findings confirm the potential of MF-PC approaches as efficient and robust solutions for next-generation power electronic converters.
电压源逆变器的无模型预测控制器:一个统一的实验基准
本文提出了一个广泛的实验比较不同的预测电流控制策略应用于两电平电压源逆变器供电的阻感性负载。所有控制器都在相同的硬件平台上实现,并在相同的工作条件下以控制器采样频率$\text{20}\,\text{kHz}$进行评估。评估的方法包括传统的基于模型(MB)的预测控制器,外生输入和递归最小二乘估计(ARX-RLS)的自回归模型,以及三种一阶超局部(UL)公式:线性扩展状态观测器,最小绝对收缩和选择算子估计器以及扩展仿射(EA)。实验结果表明,MB控制器的计算时间最短,而ARX-RLS控制器的总谐波失真(THD)最小。EA-UL方法在谐波性能、瞬态动力学和计算工作量之间提供了最佳的综合权衡。该研究强调,无模型预测控制器(MF-PC),特别是ARX-RLS和EA-UL,可以提供与MB相当或更好的性能,同时显著减少对系统建模的依赖。这些发现证实了MF-PC方法作为下一代电力电子转换器的高效和强大解决方案的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书