{"title":"Model-Free Predictive Controllers for Voltage Source Inverter: A Unified Experimental Benchmarking","authors":"Filippo Gemma;Jean-Baptiste Jacquier;Giulia Tresca;Jose Rodriguez;Pericle Zanchetta","doi":"10.1109/OJIA.2026.3700854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents an extensive experimental comparison of different predictive current control strategies applied to a two-level voltage source inverter supplying a resistive–inductive load. All controllers were implemented on the same hardware platform and evaluated under identical operating conditions at a controller sampling frequency of <inline-formula><tex-math>$\\text{20}\\,\\text{kHz}$</tex-math></inline-formula>. The evaluated methods include a conventional model-based (MB) predictive controller, an auto-regressive model with exogenous input and recursive least squares estimation (ARX–RLS), and three first-order ultra-local (UL) formulations: the linear extended state observer, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-based estimator and the extended-affine (EA). Experimental results confirm that the MB achieved the lowest computational time, whereas the ARX–RLS controller attained the lowest total harmonic distortion (THD). The EA-UL method provided the best overall tradeoff between harmonic performance, transient dynamics, and computational effort. The study highlights that model-free-predictive controllers (MF-PC), particularly ARX–RLS and EA-UL, can deliver performance comparable to or better than MB while significantly reducing dependence on system modeling. These findings confirm the potential of MF-PC approaches as efficient and robust solutions for next-generation power electronic converters.","PeriodicalId":100629,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Open Journal of Industry Applications","volume":"7 ","pages":"625-639"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11551985","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Open Journal of Industry Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11551985/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article presents an extensive experimental comparison of different predictive current control strategies applied to a two-level voltage source inverter supplying a resistive–inductive load. All controllers were implemented on the same hardware platform and evaluated under identical operating conditions at a controller sampling frequency of $\text{20}\,\text{kHz}$. The evaluated methods include a conventional model-based (MB) predictive controller, an auto-regressive model with exogenous input and recursive least squares estimation (ARX–RLS), and three first-order ultra-local (UL) formulations: the linear extended state observer, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-based estimator and the extended-affine (EA). Experimental results confirm that the MB achieved the lowest computational time, whereas the ARX–RLS controller attained the lowest total harmonic distortion (THD). The EA-UL method provided the best overall tradeoff between harmonic performance, transient dynamics, and computational effort. The study highlights that model-free-predictive controllers (MF-PC), particularly ARX–RLS and EA-UL, can deliver performance comparable to or better than MB while significantly reducing dependence on system modeling. These findings confirm the potential of MF-PC approaches as efficient and robust solutions for next-generation power electronic converters.