{"title":"Carbon costs and network structure. A policy analysis on how CORSIA rewires airline strategies","authors":"Ankit Sharma, Suresh Kumar Jakhar","doi":"10.1016/j.jpolmod.2026.107057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Global efforts to regulate aviation emissions increasingly rely on market-based instruments that aim to reconcile environmental objectives with continued growth in air transport. The Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA), introduced by the International Civil Aviation Organization, represents a landmark intervention in this regard. While existing assessments of CORSIA primarily focus on emissions coverage and compliance costs, considerably less attention has been paid to how airlines strategically adapt their network structures in response to carbon constraints, and whether these adaptations align with policy intent. This paper examines how carbon offsetting regulation may induce unintended network restructuring in international aviation. Focusing on intercontinental airline networks operating in a competitive yet cooperative environment, the study analyses how airlines reconfigure routes, hubs, and market participation as regulatory stringency increases under CORSIA. Rather than treating airline networks as fixed, the analysis explicitly captures network reorganization as an endogenous behavioural response to carbon regulation. The results indicate that carbon constraints can lead airlines to restructure networks in ways that reduce direct long-haul connectivity, intensify hub concentration, and redistribute market shares across competitors. Importantly, these responses are heterogeneous: airlines with higher fuel efficiency are better positioned to preserve network reach, while less fuel-efficient carriers face stronger incentives to withdraw from certain routes or rely on indirect connections. Such dynamics suggest that CORSIA may influence competitive balance and regional connectivity outcomes beyond its emissions objectives. The study underscores the need for policymakers to account for network-level behavioural responses when evaluating the effectiveness of global aviation climate policies. By revealing how carbon regulation interacts with airline network design, the paper offers insights for improving the design, monitoring, and complementary governance of CORSIA to better align environmental goals with broader economic and connectivity considerations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy Modeling","volume":"48 4","pages":"Article 107057"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policy Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161893826000517","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Global efforts to regulate aviation emissions increasingly rely on market-based instruments that aim to reconcile environmental objectives with continued growth in air transport. The Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA), introduced by the International Civil Aviation Organization, represents a landmark intervention in this regard. While existing assessments of CORSIA primarily focus on emissions coverage and compliance costs, considerably less attention has been paid to how airlines strategically adapt their network structures in response to carbon constraints, and whether these adaptations align with policy intent. This paper examines how carbon offsetting regulation may induce unintended network restructuring in international aviation. Focusing on intercontinental airline networks operating in a competitive yet cooperative environment, the study analyses how airlines reconfigure routes, hubs, and market participation as regulatory stringency increases under CORSIA. Rather than treating airline networks as fixed, the analysis explicitly captures network reorganization as an endogenous behavioural response to carbon regulation. The results indicate that carbon constraints can lead airlines to restructure networks in ways that reduce direct long-haul connectivity, intensify hub concentration, and redistribute market shares across competitors. Importantly, these responses are heterogeneous: airlines with higher fuel efficiency are better positioned to preserve network reach, while less fuel-efficient carriers face stronger incentives to withdraw from certain routes or rely on indirect connections. Such dynamics suggest that CORSIA may influence competitive balance and regional connectivity outcomes beyond its emissions objectives. The study underscores the need for policymakers to account for network-level behavioural responses when evaluating the effectiveness of global aviation climate policies. By revealing how carbon regulation interacts with airline network design, the paper offers insights for improving the design, monitoring, and complementary governance of CORSIA to better align environmental goals with broader economic and connectivity considerations.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Policy Modeling is published by Elsevier for the Society for Policy Modeling to provide a forum for analysis and debate concerning international policy issues. The journal addresses questions of critical import to the world community as a whole, and it focuses upon the economic, social, and political interdependencies between national and regional systems. This implies concern with international policies for the promotion of a better life for all human beings and, therefore, concentrates on improved methodological underpinnings for dealing with these problems.