Carbon pricing, growth, and green financing: Policy options for Saudi Arabia

IF 2.8 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Journal of Policy Modeling Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2026.01.002
Carlo Andrea Bollino, Fakhri J. Hasanov, Heyran Aliyeva, Majed Almozaini
{"title":"Carbon pricing, growth, and green financing: Policy options for Saudi Arabia","authors":"Carlo Andrea Bollino,&nbsp;Fakhri J. Hasanov,&nbsp;Heyran Aliyeva,&nbsp;Majed Almozaini","doi":"10.1016/j.jpolmod.2026.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study simulates the impact of hypothetical carbon-pricing policy options with alternative revenue recycling on Saudi Arabia’s economic growth and its decarbonization aspirations, using a semi-structural macro-sectoral econometric model, extended with energy and emissions linkages. The following findings are worth considering. (i) Deregulation of sales prices for 15 energy and 4 feedstock products, assumed in Business as Usual-BaU, raises prices in 2040 to 35% above 2025 levels. On average over the period 2025–2040, (ii) Carbon prices of 75 SAR per ton of CO2 emissions at the top of energy price reforms, with revenues spent under conventional budget patterns and channels, would reduce CO2 emissions by 5.2% against the BAU, but slows down economic growth by 0.5% against the BAU. (iii) A two-year <em>vacatio legis</em> for carbon pricing law, combined with short-term solar subsidies financed by green-bond borrowing, would ease economic drag to 0.4% below the BAU, while reducing emissions by 9% relative to the BaU. (iv) If instead, the carbon price revenues were recycled into long-term sustained support for renewable energy investments, economic growth could be even higher than in the BAU by 0.2%, while emissions could fall further to 15.4%.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy Modeling","volume":"48 4","pages":"Article 107025"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policy Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161893826000049","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study simulates the impact of hypothetical carbon-pricing policy options with alternative revenue recycling on Saudi Arabia’s economic growth and its decarbonization aspirations, using a semi-structural macro-sectoral econometric model, extended with energy and emissions linkages. The following findings are worth considering. (i) Deregulation of sales prices for 15 energy and 4 feedstock products, assumed in Business as Usual-BaU, raises prices in 2040 to 35% above 2025 levels. On average over the period 2025–2040, (ii) Carbon prices of 75 SAR per ton of CO2 emissions at the top of energy price reforms, with revenues spent under conventional budget patterns and channels, would reduce CO2 emissions by 5.2% against the BAU, but slows down economic growth by 0.5% against the BAU. (iii) A two-year vacatio legis for carbon pricing law, combined with short-term solar subsidies financed by green-bond borrowing, would ease economic drag to 0.4% below the BAU, while reducing emissions by 9% relative to the BaU. (iv) If instead, the carbon price revenues were recycled into long-term sustained support for renewable energy investments, economic growth could be even higher than in the BAU by 0.2%, while emissions could fall further to 15.4%.
碳定价、增长和绿色融资:沙特阿拉伯的政策选择
本研究使用半结构性宏观部门计量经济模型,扩展了能源和排放的联系,模拟了假设的碳定价政策方案对沙特阿拉伯经济增长及其脱碳愿望的影响,并考虑了替代性收入回收。以下发现值得考虑。(i)对15种能源产品和4种原料产品的销售价格放松管制,假设业务照常- bau,将使2040年的价格比2025年的水平提高35%。平均而言,在2025-2040年期间,(ii)在能源价格改革的顶端,每吨二氧化碳排放75 SAR的碳价,在常规预算模式和渠道下花费的收入,将使二氧化碳排放量相对于BAU减少5.2%,但相对于BAU减缓0.5%的经济增长。(iii)碳定价法的两年休假立法,加上绿色债券融资提供的短期太阳能补贴,将使经济拖累降低到低于BAU的0.4%,同时相对于BAU减少9%的排放量。(iv)相反,如果碳价格收入被循环用于长期持续支持可再生能源投资,经济增长可能比BAU高出0.2%,而排放量可能进一步下降至15.4%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
11.40%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: The Journal of Policy Modeling is published by Elsevier for the Society for Policy Modeling to provide a forum for analysis and debate concerning international policy issues. The journal addresses questions of critical import to the world community as a whole, and it focuses upon the economic, social, and political interdependencies between national and regional systems. This implies concern with international policies for the promotion of a better life for all human beings and, therefore, concentrates on improved methodological underpinnings for dealing with these problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书