When the state doesn’t drive retirement: informal transport workers and the crisis of social protection in Ghana

IF 4.8 Q2 TRANSPORTATION
Oteng Samuel Ampadu, Awuku Emefa Tonorgbevi
{"title":"When the state doesn’t drive retirement: informal transport workers and the crisis of social protection in Ghana","authors":"Oteng Samuel Ampadu,&nbsp;Awuku Emefa Tonorgbevi","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2026.102106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines how Ghana’s informal transport workers navigate retirement planning without formal pensions. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 65 minibus and taxi drivers across urban Ghana, selected purposively to capture a diverse age range (30–65 years). Thematic analysis reveals three key findings on how occupational precarity shapes retirement strategies. First, workers develop hybrid financial systems that combine vehicle asset liquidation, informal savings (susu), and intergenerational support—strategies that treat vehicles as retirement assets, with implications for fleet sustainability. Second, while most drivers enroll in national health insurance, they neglect mental health and disability planning, exposing gaps in occupational health provisions for aging transport workers. Third, deep institutional distrust fosters a preference for self-managed solutions over formal pensions, challenging policymakers to design transport-sector-specific social protection mechanisms. The concept of “negotiated social protection” is introduced to explain how workers blend security strategies, suggesting asset-based welfare products and union-led pension schemes that harness existing trust. The study contributes to transportation research by examining the human dimensions of transport systems often overlooked in infrastructure-focused scholarship—specifically, the life-course trajectories and social protection needs of the workers who sustain informal transport networks in low- and middle-income countries. The study bridges transport research, labor geography, and social policy by highlighting the intersection of aging and precarity in the informal transport sector. The findings call for rethinking retirement policies for informal transport workers, demonstrating that the welfare of aging workers is integral to sustainable urban transport systems that serve millions across cities in the Global South.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 102106"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259019822600271X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines how Ghana’s informal transport workers navigate retirement planning without formal pensions. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 65 minibus and taxi drivers across urban Ghana, selected purposively to capture a diverse age range (30–65 years). Thematic analysis reveals three key findings on how occupational precarity shapes retirement strategies. First, workers develop hybrid financial systems that combine vehicle asset liquidation, informal savings (susu), and intergenerational support—strategies that treat vehicles as retirement assets, with implications for fleet sustainability. Second, while most drivers enroll in national health insurance, they neglect mental health and disability planning, exposing gaps in occupational health provisions for aging transport workers. Third, deep institutional distrust fosters a preference for self-managed solutions over formal pensions, challenging policymakers to design transport-sector-specific social protection mechanisms. The concept of “negotiated social protection” is introduced to explain how workers blend security strategies, suggesting asset-based welfare products and union-led pension schemes that harness existing trust. The study contributes to transportation research by examining the human dimensions of transport systems often overlooked in infrastructure-focused scholarship—specifically, the life-course trajectories and social protection needs of the workers who sustain informal transport networks in low- and middle-income countries. The study bridges transport research, labor geography, and social policy by highlighting the intersection of aging and precarity in the informal transport sector. The findings call for rethinking retirement policies for informal transport workers, demonstrating that the welfare of aging workers is integral to sustainable urban transport systems that serve millions across cities in the Global South.
当国家不推动退休时:加纳的非正规运输工人和社会保障危机
本研究考察了加纳的非正规运输工人如何在没有正式养老金的情况下进行退休计划。对加纳城市的65名小巴和出租车司机进行了定性访谈,有意选择以捕捉不同年龄范围(30-65 岁)。专题分析揭示了职业不稳定性如何影响退休策略的三个关键发现。首先,工人开发混合金融系统,将车辆资产清算、非正式储蓄(susu)和将车辆视为退休资产的代际支持策略结合起来,从而影响车队的可持续性。其次,虽然大多数司机都参加了国家健康保险,但他们忽视了心理健康和残疾规划,这暴露了老龄运输工人职业健康保障方面的差距。第三,根深蒂固的制度不信任促使人们倾向于自我管理的解决方案,而不是正式的养老金,这对政策制定者设计针对交通部门的社会保护机制构成了挑战。“协商社会保护”的概念被引入,以解释工人如何将安全策略结合起来,建议以资产为基础的福利产品和利用现有信任的工会主导的养老金计划。该研究对交通运输研究做出了贡献,因为它考察了交通运输系统的人的方面,这些方面在以基础设施为重点的学术研究中往往被忽视,特别是低收入和中等收入国家维持非正式交通网络的工人的生命历程轨迹和社会保护需求。该研究通过强调老龄化和非正规交通部门不稳定的交叉关系,将交通研究、劳动力地理和社会政策联系起来。研究结果呼吁重新考虑非正规交通工人的退休政策,并表明老龄工人的福利是可持续城市交通系统的组成部分,该系统为全球南方城市的数百万人提供服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书