Patterns of Neoatherosclerotic Plaque Complications in Patients With Stent Failure: An Optical Coherence Tomography Study

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions Pub Date : 2026-10-14 Epub Date: 2026-07-16 DOI:10.1002/ccd.70760
Gunduz Incesu, Bilgehan Karadag, Mahmut Kaan Temiz, Isil Firdevs Saribay Incesu, Ahmet Atıl Aygun, Sedat Güney, Fatma Gungor, Asli Soysal, Alpin Mert Tekin, Damla Raimoglou, Murat Cimci, Utku Raimoglu, Eser Durmaz
{"title":"Patterns of Neoatherosclerotic Plaque Complications in Patients With Stent Failure: An Optical Coherence Tomography Study","authors":"Gunduz Incesu,&nbsp;Bilgehan Karadag,&nbsp;Mahmut Kaan Temiz,&nbsp;Isil Firdevs Saribay Incesu,&nbsp;Ahmet Atıl Aygun,&nbsp;Sedat Güney,&nbsp;Fatma Gungor,&nbsp;Asli Soysal,&nbsp;Alpin Mert Tekin,&nbsp;Damla Raimoglou,&nbsp;Murat Cimci,&nbsp;Utku Raimoglu,&nbsp;Eser Durmaz","doi":"10.1002/ccd.70760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Neoatherosclerosis is a major mechanism of late and very late stent failure. While plaque rupture (PR) has traditionally been considered the dominant substrate, the prevalence and characteristics of other neoatherosclerotic plaque complications remain insufficiently defined. We aimed to investigate the morphological and clinical differences between neoatherosclerotic PR and plaque erosion (PE) using optical coherence tomography (OCT).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective single-center study included patients with stent failure undergoing OCT-guided percutaneous coronary intervention between January 2020 and December 2025. Patients with neoatherosclerosis-related stent failure were classified according to OCT findings as PR or PE. Clinical presentation, angiographic characteristics, OCT-derived plaque morphology, and long-term outcomes were compared.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 103 screened patients, 44 met the inclusion criteria; 28 had PR, 14 had PE and 2 had instent eruptive calcific nodule. PR patients more frequently presented with STEMI and demonstrated significantly higher levels of macrophage infiltration (57.1% vs. 23.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.043), cholesterol crystals (60.7% vs. 28.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.050), lipid arc ≥ 180° (80% vs. 42.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.031), and thin-cap fibroatheroma (35.7% vs. 7.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.048). In contrast, layered plaque was markedly more prevalent in PE (92.9% vs. 48.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.004), and minimal in-stent lumen area was smaller in PE lesions (<i>p</i> = 0.039). Postprocedural thrombus protrusion was significantly more common in PR (81% vs. 27.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.005). Although not statistically significant, all-cause and cardiac mortality were numerically higher in PR patients during follow-up.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Neoatherosclerotic PR and PE represent distinct mechanisms of stent failure with different inflammatory profiles, plaque morphology, and clinical presentations. PR is associated with higher lipid burden and inflammatory activity, whereas PE is characterized by layered neointima and lower inflammatory features. OCT-based plaque characterization may improve risk stratification and support personalized treatment strategies in late stent failure.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":"108 4","pages":"1157-1164"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.70760","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Neoatherosclerosis is a major mechanism of late and very late stent failure. While plaque rupture (PR) has traditionally been considered the dominant substrate, the prevalence and characteristics of other neoatherosclerotic plaque complications remain insufficiently defined. We aimed to investigate the morphological and clinical differences between neoatherosclerotic PR and plaque erosion (PE) using optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Methods

This retrospective single-center study included patients with stent failure undergoing OCT-guided percutaneous coronary intervention between January 2020 and December 2025. Patients with neoatherosclerosis-related stent failure were classified according to OCT findings as PR or PE. Clinical presentation, angiographic characteristics, OCT-derived plaque morphology, and long-term outcomes were compared.

Results

Among 103 screened patients, 44 met the inclusion criteria; 28 had PR, 14 had PE and 2 had instent eruptive calcific nodule. PR patients more frequently presented with STEMI and demonstrated significantly higher levels of macrophage infiltration (57.1% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.043), cholesterol crystals (60.7% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.050), lipid arc ≥ 180° (80% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.031), and thin-cap fibroatheroma (35.7% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.048). In contrast, layered plaque was markedly more prevalent in PE (92.9% vs. 48.3%, p = 0.004), and minimal in-stent lumen area was smaller in PE lesions (p = 0.039). Postprocedural thrombus protrusion was significantly more common in PR (81% vs. 27.5%, p = 0.005). Although not statistically significant, all-cause and cardiac mortality were numerically higher in PR patients during follow-up.

Conclusions

Neoatherosclerotic PR and PE represent distinct mechanisms of stent failure with different inflammatory profiles, plaque morphology, and clinical presentations. PR is associated with higher lipid burden and inflammatory activity, whereas PE is characterized by layered neointima and lower inflammatory features. OCT-based plaque characterization may improve risk stratification and support personalized treatment strategies in late stent failure.

支架失效患者新动脉粥样硬化斑块并发症的模式:光学相干断层扫描研究。
背景:新动脉粥样硬化是晚期和极晚期支架失效的主要机制。虽然斑块破裂(PR)传统上被认为是主要的基质,但其他新动脉粥样硬化斑块并发症的患病率和特征仍然不够明确。我们的目的是利用光学相干断层扫描(OCT)研究新动脉粥样硬化性PR和斑块侵蚀(PE)的形态学和临床差异。方法:这项回顾性单中心研究纳入了2020年1月至2025年12月期间接受oct引导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的支架失效患者。新动脉粥样硬化相关支架失效患者根据OCT表现分为PR或PE。临床表现、血管造影特征、oct衍生斑块形态和长期结果进行比较。结果:103例患者中,44例符合纳入标准;PR 28例,PE 14例,突发性钙化结节2例。PR患者更频繁地出现STEMI,巨噬细胞浸润(57.1% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.043)、胆固醇结晶(60.7% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.050)、脂质弧度≥180°(80% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.031)和薄帽纤维粥样硬化(35.7% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.048)水平显著升高。相比之下,层状斑块在PE中更为普遍(92.9%比48.3%,p = 0.004), PE病变的最小支架内管腔面积更小(p = 0.039)。术后血栓突出在PR中更为常见(81% vs. 27.5%, p = 0.005)。虽然没有统计学意义,但PR患者在随访期间的全因死亡率和心脏死亡率在数字上较高。结论:新动脉粥样硬化性PR和PE表现出不同的支架失效机制,具有不同的炎症特征、斑块形态和临床表现。PR与较高的脂质负担和炎症活动有关,而PE的特征是层状新生内膜和较低的炎症特征。基于oct的斑块表征可以改善风险分层,支持晚期支架失效的个性化治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书