Higher circulating neutrophil apoptosis in non-survivors with sepsis.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Chien-Min Chu, Chih-Yu Huang, Chung-Chieh Yu, Li-Fu Li, Huang-Pin Wu
{"title":"Higher circulating neutrophil apoptosis in non-survivors with sepsis.","authors":"Chien-Min Chu, Chih-Yu Huang, Chung-Chieh Yu, Li-Fu Li, Huang-Pin Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.jmii.2026.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unusual cell death in immune cells contributes to immunosuppression in sepsis. Neutrophils play a crucial role in fighting pathogens. However, the roles of apoptosis, pyroptosis, and neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation (NETosis) in neutrophils during sepsis remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients admitted to the intensive care unit with sepsis were enrolled between August 2021 and July 2024. Apoptosis, pyroptosis, and NETosis in circulating neutrophils were measured on days 1 and 8. Finally, data from 43 patients were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On day 8, the count and percentage of neutrophils dying primarily through apoptosis were significantly higher in non-survivors compared to survivors (9.7 vs. 2.0/μL; 7.2 vs. 3.4%, respectively). General Linear Model revealed significant differences in both the percentage (p = 0.035) and count (p = 0.008) of apoptosis-predominant neutrophil death on days 1 and 8 between survivors and non-survivors. The percentage and count of apoptosis-predominant neutrophils on day 8 were positively correlated with the APACHE II score on day 8 with correlation coefficients of 0.560 (p < 0.001) and 0.513 (p = 0.002), respectively. SOFA score was weakly positively correlated with the count of apoptosis-predominant neutrophils on days 1 and 8 with correlation coefficients of 0.347 (p = 0.023) and 0.375 (p = 0.029), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that increased neutrophil death via apoptosis is associated with higher mortality rates in sepsis patients. Neutrophil apoptosis levels correlated with disease severity scores. Larger-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":56117,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2026.07.006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Unusual cell death in immune cells contributes to immunosuppression in sepsis. Neutrophils play a crucial role in fighting pathogens. However, the roles of apoptosis, pyroptosis, and neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation (NETosis) in neutrophils during sepsis remain unclear.

Methods: Patients admitted to the intensive care unit with sepsis were enrolled between August 2021 and July 2024. Apoptosis, pyroptosis, and NETosis in circulating neutrophils were measured on days 1 and 8. Finally, data from 43 patients were used for analysis.

Results: On day 8, the count and percentage of neutrophils dying primarily through apoptosis were significantly higher in non-survivors compared to survivors (9.7 vs. 2.0/μL; 7.2 vs. 3.4%, respectively). General Linear Model revealed significant differences in both the percentage (p = 0.035) and count (p = 0.008) of apoptosis-predominant neutrophil death on days 1 and 8 between survivors and non-survivors. The percentage and count of apoptosis-predominant neutrophils on day 8 were positively correlated with the APACHE II score on day 8 with correlation coefficients of 0.560 (p < 0.001) and 0.513 (p = 0.002), respectively. SOFA score was weakly positively correlated with the count of apoptosis-predominant neutrophils on days 1 and 8 with correlation coefficients of 0.347 (p = 0.023) and 0.375 (p = 0.029), respectively.

Conclusion: This study suggests that increased neutrophil death via apoptosis is associated with higher mortality rates in sepsis patients. Neutrophil apoptosis levels correlated with disease severity scores. Larger-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings.

脓毒症非幸存者中循环中性粒细胞凋亡增高。
背景:免疫细胞异常死亡导致败血症的免疫抑制。中性粒细胞在对抗病原体中起着至关重要的作用。然而,在脓毒症中,凋亡、焦亡和中性粒细胞胞外陷阱(NET)形成(NETosis)在中性粒细胞中的作用尚不清楚。方法:纳入2021年8月至2024年7月期间入住重症监护病房的脓毒症患者。在第1天和第8天检测循环中性粒细胞的凋亡、焦亡和NETosis。最后,使用43例患者的数据进行分析。结果:第8天,非幸存者中主要通过凋亡死亡的中性粒细胞数量和百分比明显高于幸存者(9.7 vs. 2.0/μL; 7.2 vs. 3.4%)。一般线性模型显示,幸存者与非幸存者在第1天和第8天凋亡为主的中性粒细胞死亡百分比(p = 0.035)和计数(p = 0.008)均有显著差异。第8天凋亡优势中性粒细胞百分比和计数与第8天APACHEⅱ评分呈正相关,相关系数为0.560 (p )。结论:本研究提示脓毒症患者凋亡导致的中性粒细胞死亡增加与较高的死亡率相关。中性粒细胞凋亡水平与疾病严重程度评分相关。需要更大规模的研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection
Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection IMMUNOLOGY-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
5.40%
发文量
159
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection is an open access journal, committed to disseminating information on the latest trends and advances in microbiology, immunology, infectious diseases and parasitology. Article types considered include perspectives, review articles, original articles, brief reports and correspondence. With the aim of promoting effective and accurate scientific information, an expert panel of referees constitutes the backbone of the peer-review process in evaluating the quality and content of manuscripts submitted for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书