Antimicrobial stewardship in community pharmacies in Uyo, Akwa Ibom State: practices, barriers, and facilitators.

Mbuotidem Ime Akpan, Idongesit Linus Jackson, Unyime Israel Eshiet, Mary Richard Akpan
{"title":"Antimicrobial stewardship in community pharmacies in Uyo, Akwa Ibom State: practices, barriers, and facilitators.","authors":"Mbuotidem Ime Akpan, Idongesit Linus Jackson, Unyime Israel Eshiet, Mary Richard Akpan","doi":"10.1017/ash.2026.10773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the practices, barriers, and facilitators related to antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in community pharmacies (CPs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>CPs in Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>One hundred and twelve pharmacists working in CPs, who had been practicing for at least six months and gave informed consent to participate, were surveyed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Potential participants were approached at their CPs during working hours and the study's objectives explained to them. Data were collected using a 31-item self-administered questionnaire from October to November 2023 and analyzed with SPSS version 25.0.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Participants were predominantly male (61.6%). Eighty-seven (77.7%) indicated that they often/always encourage patients to run a culture/sensitivity test before taking antibiotics. Most (95.5%) indicated that their choice of antibiotics is based on such results. The most frequently cited barriers to implementing AMS in CPs were limited access to patient records (93.8%), unrestricted patient access to antimicrobials without a prescription (90.1%), and physicians' resistance to pharmacists intervening in antibiotic selection (58.0%) or the dose/duration of prescribed antibiotics (50.9%). The most commonly reported facilitators of AMS were increased availability of pharmacy education programs on AMS (92.9%), improved access to patients' clinical/laboratory data (88.4%), improved collaboration with physicians in hospitals (85.7%), and public awareness initiatives emphasizing the role of community pharmacists in AMS (85.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants reported generally favorable AMS practices. However, tailored AMS education programs for pharmacists and the general public, along with stronger collaboration between pharmacists and physicians and between CPs and hospitals are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":"6 1","pages":"e211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13372730/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2026.10773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the practices, barriers, and facilitators related to antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in community pharmacies (CPs).

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: CPs in Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria.

Participants: One hundred and twelve pharmacists working in CPs, who had been practicing for at least six months and gave informed consent to participate, were surveyed.

Methods: Potential participants were approached at their CPs during working hours and the study's objectives explained to them. Data were collected using a 31-item self-administered questionnaire from October to November 2023 and analyzed with SPSS version 25.0.

Result: Participants were predominantly male (61.6%). Eighty-seven (77.7%) indicated that they often/always encourage patients to run a culture/sensitivity test before taking antibiotics. Most (95.5%) indicated that their choice of antibiotics is based on such results. The most frequently cited barriers to implementing AMS in CPs were limited access to patient records (93.8%), unrestricted patient access to antimicrobials without a prescription (90.1%), and physicians' resistance to pharmacists intervening in antibiotic selection (58.0%) or the dose/duration of prescribed antibiotics (50.9%). The most commonly reported facilitators of AMS were increased availability of pharmacy education programs on AMS (92.9%), improved access to patients' clinical/laboratory data (88.4%), improved collaboration with physicians in hospitals (85.7%), and public awareness initiatives emphasizing the role of community pharmacists in AMS (85.7%).

Conclusion: Participants reported generally favorable AMS practices. However, tailored AMS education programs for pharmacists and the general public, along with stronger collaboration between pharmacists and physicians and between CPs and hospitals are recommended.

阿夸伊博姆州尤约社区药房的抗微生物药物管理:做法、障碍和促进因素
目的:评价社区药房抗菌药物管理的实践、障碍和促进因素。设计:横断面研究。背景:尼日利亚阿夸伊博姆州Uyo的CPs。参与者:调查了112名在CPs工作的药剂师,他们已经执业至少六个月并知情同意参加。方法:在工作时间与潜在的参与者进行接触,并向他们解释研究的目的。数据收集采用31项自填问卷,时间为2023年10月至11月,使用SPSS 25.0版本进行分析。结果:参与者以男性为主(61.6%)。87家医院(77.7%)表示,他们经常/总是鼓励患者在服用抗生素前进行培养/敏感性试验。大多数(95.5%)表示,他们的抗生素选择是基于这些结果。在CPs中实施AMS的最常见障碍是患者记录有限(93.8%),患者在没有处方的情况下不受限制地获得抗微生物药物(90.1%),以及医生对药剂师干预抗生素选择(58.0%)或处方抗生素的剂量/持续时间(50.9%)的耐药性。最常见的辅助医疗服务促进因素是辅助医疗服务中药学教育项目的增加(92.9%),改善患者临床/实验室数据的获取(88.4%),改善与医院医生的合作(85.7%),以及强调社区药剂师在辅助医疗服务中的作用的公众意识倡议(85.7%)。结论:参与者报告了总体有利的AMS实践。然而,建议为药剂师和公众量身定制的医疗辅助服务教育计划,以及药剂师和医生以及CPs和医院之间更强有力的合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书