Angela Ym Leung, Karen Sl Cheung, Kai Ling Ou, Ivy Yan Zhao, Min Qiu, K M Wan, Jed Montayre, Yaqi Huang
{"title":"Enhancing Healthy Longevity: A Scoping Review of Practices and Interventions.","authors":"Angela Ym Leung, Karen Sl Cheung, Kai Ling Ou, Ivy Yan Zhao, Min Qiu, K M Wan, Jed Montayre, Yaqi Huang","doi":"10.2196/94085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over the past two decades, concerns have arisen about the distinction between health span and lifespan, highlighting that longevity does not necessarily equate to good health, a concept often referred to as \"healthy longevity.\" While various strategies have been explored to promote healthy aging and achieve healthy longevity, it remains uncertain which practices are most effective.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify the existing and emerging practices and interventions that promote healthy longevity, identify the key components of these practices and interventions, and to consider how stakeholders contribute to these practices and interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: A scoping review of literature Methods: Arksey & O'malley's six-stage framework was used to conduct and guide reporting. The Joanna Briggs Institute Population-Concept-Context framework was used to define eligibility criteria and select studies that report practices/interventions aimed at achieving long health span or promoting healthy longevity carried out in community. Data were manually extracted by two independent reviewers to detail the characteristics of these practices and interventions, guide the data charting process and narrative synthesis. Data Sources: Six databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, and Google Scholar) were searched for academic papers published between January 2010 and February 2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies, mostly published after 2020, were predominantly conducted in high income settings (81.0%) across North America, Europe, and Asia. Four study types were identified: interventional (33%), intervention development (19%), association (24%), and descriptive (24%). Interventional. Intervention development studies primarily described multi component programmes targeting individual and social determinants of health and generally reported beneficial effects on physical, cognitive, and psychosocial outcomes. Association studies linked micro , meso , and macro level factors (e.g. nutrition, household expenditure, housing quality, health insurance, public financing policy) to healthy longevity indicators. Descriptive studies highlighted themes cross micro and meso level, such as finance, physical activity, mental and spiritual health, digital literacy, independent living, safety, social support, and healthcare support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The identified community-based strategies, practices, and policies which extend health span represent the joint effort of multiple stakeholders and disciplines. The implementation of these practices and policies are worthy to be supported. More studies in diverse socioeconomic contexts are needed.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrial: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/94085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Over the past two decades, concerns have arisen about the distinction between health span and lifespan, highlighting that longevity does not necessarily equate to good health, a concept often referred to as "healthy longevity." While various strategies have been explored to promote healthy aging and achieve healthy longevity, it remains uncertain which practices are most effective.
Objective: To identify the existing and emerging practices and interventions that promote healthy longevity, identify the key components of these practices and interventions, and to consider how stakeholders contribute to these practices and interventions.
Methods: Design: A scoping review of literature Methods: Arksey & O'malley's six-stage framework was used to conduct and guide reporting. The Joanna Briggs Institute Population-Concept-Context framework was used to define eligibility criteria and select studies that report practices/interventions aimed at achieving long health span or promoting healthy longevity carried out in community. Data were manually extracted by two independent reviewers to detail the characteristics of these practices and interventions, guide the data charting process and narrative synthesis. Data Sources: Six databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, and Google Scholar) were searched for academic papers published between January 2010 and February 2025.
Results: Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies, mostly published after 2020, were predominantly conducted in high income settings (81.0%) across North America, Europe, and Asia. Four study types were identified: interventional (33%), intervention development (19%), association (24%), and descriptive (24%). Interventional. Intervention development studies primarily described multi component programmes targeting individual and social determinants of health and generally reported beneficial effects on physical, cognitive, and psychosocial outcomes. Association studies linked micro , meso , and macro level factors (e.g. nutrition, household expenditure, housing quality, health insurance, public financing policy) to healthy longevity indicators. Descriptive studies highlighted themes cross micro and meso level, such as finance, physical activity, mental and spiritual health, digital literacy, independent living, safety, social support, and healthcare support.
Conclusions: The identified community-based strategies, practices, and policies which extend health span represent the joint effort of multiple stakeholders and disciplines. The implementation of these practices and policies are worthy to be supported. More studies in diverse socioeconomic contexts are needed.
背景:在过去的二十年里,人们开始关注健康跨度和寿命之间的区别,强调长寿并不一定等同于健康,这一概念通常被称为“健康长寿”。虽然已经探索了各种促进健康老龄化和实现健康长寿的策略,但仍不确定哪种做法最有效。目的:确定促进健康长寿的现有和新兴做法和干预措施,确定这些做法和干预措施的关键组成部分,并考虑利益相关者如何促进这些做法和干预措施。方法:采用Arksey & O'malley的六阶段框架来进行和指导报告。乔安娜布里格斯研究所人口-概念-背景框架用于确定资格标准和选择报告旨在实现长寿或促进社区健康长寿的实践/干预措施的研究。数据由两名独立审稿人手动提取,以详细说明这些实践和干预措施的特征,指导数据制图过程和叙事综合。数据来源:检索了2010年1月至2025年2月间发表的学术论文,检索了PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Scopus、CINAHL和谷歌Scholar六大数据库。结果:21项研究符合纳入标准。这些研究大多是在2020年之后发表的,主要是在北美、欧洲和亚洲的高收入国家(81.0%)进行的。确定了四种研究类型:介入性(33%)、干预发展性(19%)、相关性(24%)和描述性(24%)。介入。干预发展研究主要描述了针对健康的个人和社会决定因素的多成分规划,并普遍报告了对身体、认知和社会心理结果的有益影响。关联研究将微观、中观和宏观层面的因素(如营养、家庭支出、住房质量、医疗保险、公共融资政策)与健康长寿指标联系起来。描述性研究强调了微观和中观层面的主题,如金融、身体活动、心理和精神健康、数字素养、独立生活、安全、社会支持和医疗保健支持。结论:已确定的以社区为基础的延长健康跨度的战略、做法和政策代表了多个利益相关者和学科的共同努力。这些做法和政策的实施值得支持。需要在不同的社会经济背景下进行更多的研究。临床试验: