Hearing Loss Perceptions in Patients With Subjective Asymmetry: Analysis and Implications.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
American Journal of Audiology Pub Date : 2026-09-03 Epub Date: 2026-07-17 DOI:10.1044/2026_AJA-25-00291
Aaron Tucker, Andrew Belilos, Pavan S Krishnan, Arman Saeedi, Mihai A Bentan, Sarah Gills, Daniel H Coelho
{"title":"Hearing Loss Perceptions in Patients With Subjective Asymmetry: Analysis and Implications.","authors":"Aaron Tucker, Andrew Belilos, Pavan S Krishnan, Arman Saeedi, Mihai A Bentan, Sarah Gills, Daniel H Coelho","doi":"10.1044/2026_AJA-25-00291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of self-reported hearing asymmetry in predicting objectively defined asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) and identify patient factors associated with over- or underestimation of individual ear hearing loss severity.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional survey analysis of consecutive adult patients undergoing audiometric evaluation was conducted at the audiology and otology/neurotology clinics of a single tertiary referral center from 2020 to 2025. Fifty patients reporting hearing asymmetry who had not undergone prior audiometric testing within 5 years were included. A survey was administered to quantify subjective individual ear hearing loss severity before audiometric evaluation to determine the accuracy of self-reported AHL (≥ 15 dB interaural difference) and subjective severity estimation for each ear.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy percent of patients incorrectly identified AHL based on audiometric testing. Misclassification did not differ significantly according to age, sex, or race. Patients with lower (< 25 dB) or moderate (25-50 dB) binaural pure-tone averages were more likely to misclassify AHL than those with higher thresholds (> 50 dB). Sixty-two percent of patients misclassified the worse hearing ear, with a strong bias toward overestimation (94%). In contrast, 48% misclassified the better hearing ear, with a modest skew toward underestimation (58%). Across subgroups, worse hearing ears were significantly overestimated compared with better hearing ears. Patients with better binaural hearing and narrower interaural differences were more prone to worse hearing ear overestimation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is likely that patients do not reliably estimate AHL corresponding to a 15-dB interaural difference. Better binaural hearing and lower interaural asymmetry were associated with poorer estimation of the worse hearing ear, underscoring the importance of audiometric confirmation in patients with preserved hearing.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1078-1087"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_AJA-25-00291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of self-reported hearing asymmetry in predicting objectively defined asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) and identify patient factors associated with over- or underestimation of individual ear hearing loss severity.

Method: A cross-sectional survey analysis of consecutive adult patients undergoing audiometric evaluation was conducted at the audiology and otology/neurotology clinics of a single tertiary referral center from 2020 to 2025. Fifty patients reporting hearing asymmetry who had not undergone prior audiometric testing within 5 years were included. A survey was administered to quantify subjective individual ear hearing loss severity before audiometric evaluation to determine the accuracy of self-reported AHL (≥ 15 dB interaural difference) and subjective severity estimation for each ear.

Results: Seventy percent of patients incorrectly identified AHL based on audiometric testing. Misclassification did not differ significantly according to age, sex, or race. Patients with lower (< 25 dB) or moderate (25-50 dB) binaural pure-tone averages were more likely to misclassify AHL than those with higher thresholds (> 50 dB). Sixty-two percent of patients misclassified the worse hearing ear, with a strong bias toward overestimation (94%). In contrast, 48% misclassified the better hearing ear, with a modest skew toward underestimation (58%). Across subgroups, worse hearing ears were significantly overestimated compared with better hearing ears. Patients with better binaural hearing and narrower interaural differences were more prone to worse hearing ear overestimation.

Conclusions: It is likely that patients do not reliably estimate AHL corresponding to a 15-dB interaural difference. Better binaural hearing and lower interaural asymmetry were associated with poorer estimation of the worse hearing ear, underscoring the importance of audiometric confirmation in patients with preserved hearing.

主观不对称患者的听力损失感知:分析和意义。
目的:本研究的目的是评估自我报告的听力不对称在预测客观定义的不对称听力损失(AHL)方面的准确性,并确定与个体耳部听力损失严重程度高估或低估相关的患者因素。方法:对2020 - 2025年在某三级转诊中心听力学和耳科/神经科门诊连续接受听力学评估的成年患者进行横断面调查分析。50例报告听力不对称的患者在5年内未接受听力测试。在听力测量评估之前,进行了一项调查,量化主观个体耳听力损失严重程度,以确定每只耳朵自我报告的AHL(≥15 dB耳间差异)和主观严重程度估计的准确性。结果:70%的患者根据听力测试错误地识别出AHL。错误分类没有因年龄、性别或种族而有显著差异。双耳纯音平均值较低(< 25 dB)或中等(25-50 dB)的患者比阈值较高(bb0 -50 dB)的患者更容易误诊AHL。62%的患者对听力较差的耳朵进行了错误的分类,有很强的高估倾向(94%)。相比之下,48%的人错误地分类了听力较好的那只耳朵,还有58%的人倾向于低估。在各个亚组中,听力较差的耳朵与听力较好的耳朵相比被显著高估。双耳听力较好、耳际差异较窄的患者更容易出现更严重的听力高估。结论:患者可能无法可靠地估计对应于15db耳间差异的AHL。较好的双耳听力和较低的耳间不对称与较差的听力估计相关,强调了听力保留患者的听力确认的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Audiology
American Journal of Audiology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
163
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: AJA publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to clinical audiology methods and issues, and serves as an outlet for discussion of related professional and educational issues and ideas. The journal is an international outlet for research on clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, management and outcomes of hearing and balance disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. The clinical orientation of the journal allows for the publication of reports on audiology as implemented nationally and internationally, including novel clinical procedures, approaches, and cases. AJA seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of clinical audiology, including audiologic/aural rehabilitation; balance and balance disorders; cultural and linguistic diversity; detection, diagnosis, prevention, habilitation, rehabilitation, and monitoring of hearing loss; hearing aids, cochlear implants, and hearing-assistive technology; hearing disorders; lifespan perspectives on auditory function; speech perception; and tinnitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书