Development and validation of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for rheumatology training in Brazil: the Reuma-EPA project.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Claudia Diniz Lopes Marques, Carlos Augusto Ferreira de Andrade, Carolina Müller, Danielle Egypto, Elaine Lira Medeiros, Fabíola Brasil B Rodrigues, Jozelia Rêgo, Marcelo Pimenta, Maria José Pereira Vilar, Rina Dalva Neubarth, Simone Apenzeller, Sônia Maria A A Loduca Lima, Sueli Carneiro, Wilton Ferreira S Santos, José Eduardo Martinez
{"title":"Development and validation of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for rheumatology training in Brazil: the Reuma-EPA project.","authors":"Claudia Diniz Lopes Marques, Carlos Augusto Ferreira de Andrade, Carolina Müller, Danielle Egypto, Elaine Lira Medeiros, Fabíola Brasil B Rodrigues, Jozelia Rêgo, Marcelo Pimenta, Maria José Pereira Vilar, Rina Dalva Neubarth, Simone Apenzeller, Sônia Maria A A Loduca Lima, Sueli Carneiro, Wilton Ferreira S Santos, José Eduardo Martinez","doi":"10.1186/s42358-026-00565-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Competency-based medical education increasingly guides postgraduate training worldwide. However, rheumatology training in Brazil still lacks a nationally standardized framework to define and assess core professional activities. Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) address this gap by translating competencies into observable clinical practice and supporting supervision, assessment, and progressive autonomy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and validate a national EPA framework for rheumatology training in Brazil and to present the conceptual and practical foundations supporting competency-based assessment in the specialty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Reuma-EPA project was conducted by the Education Committee of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology using a five-phase methodological approach: identification of core professional activities, drafting of preliminary EPAs, internal expert review, internal consistency analysis, and national validation through a two-round Delphi process. Rheumatology educators from accredited residency programs across Brazil evaluated each EPA for relevance, clarity, and suitability for independent execution at the end of training. Consensus was defined as at least 80% of responses rated as 4 or 5 on a five-point Likert scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven EPAs were developed and validated, covering the full spectrum of rheumatology practice, including ethical and professional conduct, patient assessment, diagnostic reasoning, laboratory and imaging interpretation, outpatient and inpatient care, use of immunomodulatory therapies, procedural skills, patient safety, and education. Each EPA was mapped to supervision levels and developmental milestones, creating a comprehensive framework that integrates patient-safety considerations and suggested workplace-based assessment tools for Brazilian rheumatology training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Reuma-EPA project establishes the first nationally validated EPA framework for rheumatology training in Brazil. By providing an actionable competency-based structure aligned with national regulatory standards, this initiative supports curricular harmonization, transparent assessment, and the progressive development of resident autonomy with patient safety as a central principle. This framework has the potential to strengthen rheumatology training nationally and may serve as a model for other specialties and healthcare systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":48634,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13660143/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42358-026-00565-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Competency-based medical education increasingly guides postgraduate training worldwide. However, rheumatology training in Brazil still lacks a nationally standardized framework to define and assess core professional activities. Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) address this gap by translating competencies into observable clinical practice and supporting supervision, assessment, and progressive autonomy.

Objective: To develop and validate a national EPA framework for rheumatology training in Brazil and to present the conceptual and practical foundations supporting competency-based assessment in the specialty.

Methods: The Reuma-EPA project was conducted by the Education Committee of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology using a five-phase methodological approach: identification of core professional activities, drafting of preliminary EPAs, internal expert review, internal consistency analysis, and national validation through a two-round Delphi process. Rheumatology educators from accredited residency programs across Brazil evaluated each EPA for relevance, clarity, and suitability for independent execution at the end of training. Consensus was defined as at least 80% of responses rated as 4 or 5 on a five-point Likert scale.

Results: Eleven EPAs were developed and validated, covering the full spectrum of rheumatology practice, including ethical and professional conduct, patient assessment, diagnostic reasoning, laboratory and imaging interpretation, outpatient and inpatient care, use of immunomodulatory therapies, procedural skills, patient safety, and education. Each EPA was mapped to supervision levels and developmental milestones, creating a comprehensive framework that integrates patient-safety considerations and suggested workplace-based assessment tools for Brazilian rheumatology training.

Conclusion: The Reuma-EPA project establishes the first nationally validated EPA framework for rheumatology training in Brazil. By providing an actionable competency-based structure aligned with national regulatory standards, this initiative supports curricular harmonization, transparent assessment, and the progressive development of resident autonomy with patient safety as a central principle. This framework has the potential to strengthen rheumatology training nationally and may serve as a model for other specialties and healthcare systems.

开发和验证巴西风湿病学培训的可信赖专业活动(EPAs): Reuma-EPA项目。
背景:能力本位医学教育在世界范围内日益成为研究生培养的指导思想。然而,巴西的风湿病学培训仍然缺乏一个国家标准化的框架来定义和评估核心专业活动。可信赖的专业活动(EPAs)通过将能力转化为可观察的临床实践和支持监督、评估和渐进自治来解决这一差距。目的:开发和验证巴西风湿病学培训的国家EPA框架,并提出支持该专业基于能力评估的概念和实践基础。方法:Reuma-EPA项目由巴西风湿病学会教育委员会实施,采用五阶段方法学方法:确定核心专业活动,起草初步epa,内部专家评审,内部一致性分析,并通过两轮德尔菲过程进行国家验证。来自巴西各地认可的住院医师项目的风湿病教育工作者在培训结束时评估了每个EPA的相关性、清晰度和独立执行的适用性。共识被定义为至少80%的回答在5分李克特量表上被评为4或5分。结果:制定并验证了11项EPAs,涵盖了风湿病学实践的全部范围,包括道德和专业行为、患者评估、诊断推理、实验室和成像解释、门诊和住院护理、免疫调节疗法的使用、程序技能、患者安全和教育。每个EPA都被映射到监管水平和发展里程碑,创建了一个综合框架,该框架整合了患者安全考虑因素和巴西风湿病学培训建议的基于工作场所的评估工具。结论:Reuma-EPA项目为巴西风湿病学培训建立了第一个国家认可的EPA框架。通过提供与国家监管标准一致的可操作的基于能力的结构,该倡议支持课程协调、透明评估和以患者安全为中心原则的住院医师自主权的逐步发展。该框架具有加强全国风湿病学培训的潜力,并可作为其他专业和医疗保健系统的典范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Rheumatology
Advances in Rheumatology Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
41
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊介绍: Formerly named Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia, the journal is celebrating its 60th year of publication. Advances in Rheumatology is an international, open access journal publishing pre-clinical, translational and clinical studies on all aspects of paediatric and adult rheumatic diseases, including degenerative, inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. The journal is the official publication of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology and welcomes original research (including systematic reviews and meta-analyses), literature reviews, guidelines and letters arising from published material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书