Applying artificial intelligence to automate clinical data extraction from veterinary electronic health records: A practical guidance and comparative scoping review.

IF 2.3 2区 农林科学 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Yumi Chang, Candice P Chu
{"title":"Applying artificial intelligence to automate clinical data extraction from veterinary electronic health records: A practical guidance and comparative scoping review.","authors":"Yumi Chang, Candice P Chu","doi":"10.1177/03009858261461761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Veterinary electronic health records are often stored as unstructured free text, and structuring this information into analyzable formats is essential for downstream research. Natural language processing methods, including rule-based systems, machine learning algorithms, and, more recently, large language models (LLMs), provide tools to achieve this goal. This scoping review follows the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guideline to examine how information extraction (IE) has been applied in veterinary medicine and extended to existing LLM approaches in human medicine. Literature research was conducted on 4 databases: PubMed, CAB Abstracts, Web of Science, and ACL Anthology, with stricter criteria limiting human medicine to prompt-based studies. After screening 5796 original research papers, a total of 23 veterinary and 31 human studies were selected for inclusion. In the veterinary literature, larger data sets were more commonly used to train supervised models, whereas human studies increasingly employed prompt-based LLMs, such as LLaMA and GPT, enabling IE with smaller annotated data sets. We developed a practical framework covering data preparation, platform and privacy considerations, and prompt engineering, with a corresponding workflow and prompt example to demonstrate the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical data extraction. This review offers a practical tool to help veterinary researchers effectively integrate AI tools and LLMs into clinical research workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":23513,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"3009858261461761"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03009858261461761","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Veterinary electronic health records are often stored as unstructured free text, and structuring this information into analyzable formats is essential for downstream research. Natural language processing methods, including rule-based systems, machine learning algorithms, and, more recently, large language models (LLMs), provide tools to achieve this goal. This scoping review follows the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guideline to examine how information extraction (IE) has been applied in veterinary medicine and extended to existing LLM approaches in human medicine. Literature research was conducted on 4 databases: PubMed, CAB Abstracts, Web of Science, and ACL Anthology, with stricter criteria limiting human medicine to prompt-based studies. After screening 5796 original research papers, a total of 23 veterinary and 31 human studies were selected for inclusion. In the veterinary literature, larger data sets were more commonly used to train supervised models, whereas human studies increasingly employed prompt-based LLMs, such as LLaMA and GPT, enabling IE with smaller annotated data sets. We developed a practical framework covering data preparation, platform and privacy considerations, and prompt engineering, with a corresponding workflow and prompt example to demonstrate the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical data extraction. This review offers a practical tool to help veterinary researchers effectively integrate AI tools and LLMs into clinical research workflows.

应用人工智能自动从兽医电子健康记录中提取临床数据:实用指南和比较范围审查。
兽医电子健康记录通常以非结构化的自由文本形式存储,将这些信息结构化为可分析的格式对于下游研究至关重要。自然语言处理方法,包括基于规则的系统、机器学习算法,以及最近的大型语言模型(llm),提供了实现这一目标的工具。本范围综述遵循PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)范围综述扩展(PRISMA- scr)指南,以检查信息提取(IE)如何应用于兽医学并扩展到人类医学中现有的法学硕士方法。文献研究在PubMed、CAB Abstracts、Web of Science和ACL Anthology 4个数据库上进行,标准更严格,人类医学仅限于基于提示的研究。在筛选5796篇原始研究论文后,共选择23篇兽医研究和31篇人类研究纳入。在兽医文献中,更大的数据集更常用于训练监督模型,而人类研究越来越多地使用基于提示的llm,如LLaMA和GPT,使IE能够使用更小的注释数据集。我们开发了一个实用的框架,涵盖数据准备,平台和隐私考虑以及提示工程,以及相应的工作流程和提示示例,以演示人工智能(AI)在临床数据提取中的应用。这篇综述提供了一个实用的工具,帮助兽医研究人员有效地将人工智能工具和法学硕士整合到临床研究工作流程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Pathology
Veterinary Pathology 农林科学-病理学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
99
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Veterinary Pathology (VET) is the premier international publication of basic and applied research involving domestic, laboratory, wildlife, marine and zoo animals, and poultry. Bridging the divide between natural and experimental diseases, the journal details the diagnostic investigations of diseases of animals; reports experimental studies on mechanisms of specific processes; provides unique insights into animal models of human disease; and presents studies on environmental and pharmaceutical hazards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书