Clinical target volume radiomics from planning CT for pretreatment response prediction  in rectal cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-17 DOI:10.1007/s00066-026-02569-2
Yen-Cho Huang, Shih-Ming Huang, Jih-Hsiang Yeh, Shu-Ju Tu
{"title":"Clinical target volume radiomics from planning CT for pretreatment response prediction  in rectal cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy.","authors":"Yen-Cho Huang, Shih-Ming Huang, Jih-Hsiang Yeh, Shu-Ju Tu","doi":"10.1007/s00066-026-02569-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in rectal cancer remains heterogeneous. This exploratory study evaluated whether radiomics features extracted from the clinical target volume (CTV) on pretreatment non-contrast radiotherapy planning CT could provide additional information for pretreatment prediction of poor treatment response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study included 60 patients with rectal cancer treated with nCRT between 2008 and 2024, including 50 good responders and 10 poor responders. A total of 1148 radiomics features were extracted from the original pretreatment treatment-planning CTV and combined with clinical variables, including age, sex, cT stage, cN stage, log-transformed carcinoembryonic antigen, and tumor-to-anal verge distance. Models were internally evaluated using repeated nested cross-validation with fold-wise ComBat harmonization. Performance was assessed from pooled repeated out-of-fold predictions, including discrimination, apparent calibration, exploratory threshold-based operating characteristics, and decision curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best-performing combined clinical-radiomics model was Extra Trees, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.754 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.713-0.789), compared with 0.507 for the clinical-only model. At a post hoc sensitivity-prioritized operating threshold, the combined Extra Trees model achieved sensitivity of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.89-0.98), specificity of 0.47 (95% CI, 0.42-0.51), and negative predictive value of 0.98 in pooled repeated out-of-fold analysis. Decision curve analysis suggested potential net benefit across low-to-moderate threshold probabilities in internal analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical target volume-based radiomics from routine pretreatment non-contrast planning CT may provide exploratory information for prediction of poor response to nCRT in rectal cancer. Because treatment-planning CTVs are routinely generated before radiotherapy, this workflow may be practical for radiotherapy-based research. The findings are hypothesis generating and require external validation before clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":21998,"journal":{"name":"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie","volume":" ","pages":"954-967"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-026-02569-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in rectal cancer remains heterogeneous. This exploratory study evaluated whether radiomics features extracted from the clinical target volume (CTV) on pretreatment non-contrast radiotherapy planning CT could provide additional information for pretreatment prediction of poor treatment response.

Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 60 patients with rectal cancer treated with nCRT between 2008 and 2024, including 50 good responders and 10 poor responders. A total of 1148 radiomics features were extracted from the original pretreatment treatment-planning CTV and combined with clinical variables, including age, sex, cT stage, cN stage, log-transformed carcinoembryonic antigen, and tumor-to-anal verge distance. Models were internally evaluated using repeated nested cross-validation with fold-wise ComBat harmonization. Performance was assessed from pooled repeated out-of-fold predictions, including discrimination, apparent calibration, exploratory threshold-based operating characteristics, and decision curve analysis.

Results: The best-performing combined clinical-radiomics model was Extra Trees, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.754 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.713-0.789), compared with 0.507 for the clinical-only model. At a post hoc sensitivity-prioritized operating threshold, the combined Extra Trees model achieved sensitivity of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.89-0.98), specificity of 0.47 (95% CI, 0.42-0.51), and negative predictive value of 0.98 in pooled repeated out-of-fold analysis. Decision curve analysis suggested potential net benefit across low-to-moderate threshold probabilities in internal analysis.

Conclusion: Clinical target volume-based radiomics from routine pretreatment non-contrast planning CT may provide exploratory information for prediction of poor response to nCRT in rectal cancer. Because treatment-planning CTVs are routinely generated before radiotherapy, this workflow may be practical for radiotherapy-based research. The findings are hypothesis generating and require external validation before clinical use.

规划CT的临床靶体积放射组学用于直肠癌放化疗前疗效预测。
目的:直肠癌患者对新辅助放化疗(nCRT)的反应仍然存在异质性。本探索性研究评估了从预处理非对比放疗计划CT的临床靶体积(CTV)中提取的放射组学特征是否可以为预处理预测治疗不良反应提供额外信息。方法:本回顾性单中心研究纳入60例2008 - 2024年间接受nCRT治疗的直肠癌患者,其中50例反应良好,10例反应不良。从原始的预处理治疗计划CTV中提取1148个放射组学特征,并结合临床变量,包括年龄、性别、cT分期、cN分期、对数转化癌胚抗原、肿瘤到肛门边缘距离。使用重复嵌套交叉验证和折叠战斗协调对模型进行内部评估。通过汇总重复的叠外预测来评估性能,包括区分、表观校准、基于探索性阈值的操作特性和决策曲线分析。结果:表现最好的临床-放射组学联合模型是Extra Trees,接受者工作特征曲线下的面积为0.754(95%可信区间[CI], 0.713-0.789),而仅临床模型的面积为0.507。在事后敏感性优先的操作阈值下,合并Extra Trees模型的敏感性为0.94 (95% CI, 0.89-0.98),特异性为0.47 (95% CI, 0.42-0.51),合并重复叠外分析的阴性预测值为0.98。决策曲线分析表明,在内部分析中,低至中等阈值概率的潜在净效益。结论:常规预处理非对比计划CT的临床靶体积放射组学可为预测直肠癌nCRT不良反应提供探索性信息。由于治疗计划ctv通常在放疗前生成,因此该工作流程对于基于放疗的研究可能是实用的。这些发现是假设生成的,在临床使用之前需要外部验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
12.90%
发文量
141
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, published monthly, is a scientific journal that covers all aspects of oncology with focus on radiooncology, radiation biology and radiation physics. The articles are not only of interest to radiooncologists but to all physicians interested in oncology, to radiation biologists and radiation physicists. The journal publishes original articles, review articles and case studies that are peer-reviewed. It includes scientific short communications as well as a literature review with annotated articles that inform the reader on new developments in the various disciplines concerned and hence allow for a sound overview on the latest results in radiooncology research. Founded in 1912, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie is the oldest oncological journal in the world. Today, contributions are published in English and German. All articles have English summaries and legends. The journal is the official publication of several scientific radiooncological societies and publishes the relevant communications of these societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书