Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation for stroke rehabilitation: a scoping review.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Mustapha Mangdow, Amna Khawaja, Derong Yang, Amir Tabatabaei, Hui Gao, Sarah Eickmeyer, Randolph Nudo, Wen Liu
{"title":"Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation for stroke rehabilitation: a scoping review.","authors":"Mustapha Mangdow, Amna Khawaja, Derong Yang, Amir Tabatabaei, Hui Gao, Sarah Eickmeyer, Randolph Nudo, Wen Liu","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2026.2701030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) is an emerging noninvasive neuromodulation approach for rehabilitation in individuals with stroke. Studies have suggested benefits, but evidence remains fragmented and methodologically heterogeneous.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review maps and synthesizes current evidence on tSCS for stroke rehabilitation, focusing on study design, stimulation parameters, outcome measures, and reported effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we systematically searched five databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Google Scholar) from inception to December 2025. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, with a third resolving discrepancies. We extracted data on participant characteristics, stimulation parameters, outcome measures, and findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria, comprising five randomized and eight non-randomized designs, with sample sizes ranging from 2 to 21 participants. Most studies enrolled predominantly male individuals with chronic stroke. Four studies used multi-session protocols while nine single session protocols. Stimulation parameters varied widely amplitude (5-250 mA), frequency (15-100 Hz), carrier frequency (0-10 kHz), and pulse width (0.5-2 ms). Ten studies targeted lower-extremity function, two upper extremity functions, and one autonomic function. Multi-session trials pairing tSCS with task-specific training reported improvements in selected outcomes, though small sample sizes limit generalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>tSCS remains an exploratory adjunctive intervention in stroke rehabilitation. Future research should prioritize adequately powered controlled trials with standardized stimulation protocols, stratification by stroke severity and chronicity, and long-term follow-up to establish clinical efficacy and optimal implementation in stroke rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2026.2701030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) is an emerging noninvasive neuromodulation approach for rehabilitation in individuals with stroke. Studies have suggested benefits, but evidence remains fragmented and methodologically heterogeneous.

Objective: This scoping review maps and synthesizes current evidence on tSCS for stroke rehabilitation, focusing on study design, stimulation parameters, outcome measures, and reported effects.

Methods: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we systematically searched five databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Google Scholar) from inception to December 2025. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, with a third resolving discrepancies. We extracted data on participant characteristics, stimulation parameters, outcome measures, and findings.

Results: Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria, comprising five randomized and eight non-randomized designs, with sample sizes ranging from 2 to 21 participants. Most studies enrolled predominantly male individuals with chronic stroke. Four studies used multi-session protocols while nine single session protocols. Stimulation parameters varied widely amplitude (5-250 mA), frequency (15-100 Hz), carrier frequency (0-10 kHz), and pulse width (0.5-2 ms). Ten studies targeted lower-extremity function, two upper extremity functions, and one autonomic function. Multi-session trials pairing tSCS with task-specific training reported improvements in selected outcomes, though small sample sizes limit generalization.

Conclusions: tSCS remains an exploratory adjunctive intervention in stroke rehabilitation. Future research should prioritize adequately powered controlled trials with standardized stimulation protocols, stratification by stroke severity and chronicity, and long-term follow-up to establish clinical efficacy and optimal implementation in stroke rehabilitation.

经皮脊髓刺激治疗中风康复:范围综述。
背景:经皮脊髓刺激(tSCS)是一种新兴的无创神经调节方法,用于脑卒中患者的康复。研究表明有好处,但证据仍然支离破碎,方法上也不一致。目的:本研究综述了tSCS用于脑卒中康复的现有证据,重点关注研究设计、刺激参数、结果测量和报道的效果。方法:我们按照PRISMA-ScR指南,系统检索了5个数据库(PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、CINAHL和谷歌Scholar),检索时间从成立到2025年12月。两名独立审稿人筛选标题和摘要,第三名审稿人解决差异。我们提取了参与者特征、刺激参数、结果测量和结果的数据。结果:13项研究符合纳入标准,包括5个随机设计和8个非随机设计,样本量从2到21人不等。大多数研究主要招募患有慢性中风的男性患者。4项研究使用多会话协议,9项研究使用单会话协议。刺激参数变化幅度很大(5-250 mA)、频率(15-100 Hz)、载波频率(0-10 kHz)和脉冲宽度(0.5-2 ms)。10项研究针对下肢功能,2项针对上肢功能,1项针对自主神经功能。将tSCS与特定任务训练相结合的多阶段试验报告了选定结果的改善,尽管样本量小限制了推广。结论:tSCS仍是脑卒中康复的探索性辅助干预。未来的研究应优先考虑采用标准化刺激方案、脑卒中严重程度和慢性程度分层、长期随访的充分有力的对照试验,以确定脑卒中康复的临床疗效和最佳实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues. The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书