Platelet-Count-Guided Low Molecular Weight Heparin Management of Catheter-Related Thrombosis in a Large Cohort of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Leukemia.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Shay Perek, Niv Izhaki, Ron Hoffman, Benjamin Brenner, Netanel A Horowitz
{"title":"Platelet-Count-Guided Low Molecular Weight Heparin Management of Catheter-Related Thrombosis in a Large Cohort of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Leukemia.","authors":"Shay Perek, Niv Izhaki, Ron Hoffman, Benjamin Brenner, Netanel A Horowitz","doi":"10.1055/a-2905-4225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Treatment of catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in acute leukemia patients is challenging due to concomitant thrombocytopenia. Although modified-dose anticoagulation is frequently used in this setting, several vital outcomes remain unclear. The current study evaluated clinical outcomes of a platelet-count-guided low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) regimen in these patients. Data on all newly diagnosed acute leukemia patients, who developed CRT, were retrieved from the institutional database. Upon CRT diagnosis, patients received either a full or modified dose of LMWH, based on their platelet counts. Outcomes included recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), hemorrhagic events. Competing risk analyses were performed, with death considered a competing risk. All-cause mortality and blood product utilization (per patient; pre- and postanticoagulation commencement) were compared. A total of 193 acute leukemia patients diagnosed with CRT between November 2004 and May 2022 were included. Eighty-seven patients (45%) received full-dose LMWH. Modified-dose LMWH treatment was associated with hazard ratio (HR) of 0.642 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.268-1.540; <i>p</i> = 0.320) in terms of CRT recurrence and HR of 0.975 (95% CI: 0.439-2.170; <i>p</i> = 0.950) in terms of hemorrhage. Mortality was not significantly higher in the modified-dose group (HR: 1.47, 95% CI: 0.93-2.32; <i>p</i> = 0.092). Notably, platelet requirement did not differ before and after the CRT diagnosis, irrespective of LMWH doses used (full-dose group: median pre-CRT 0.09 [interquartile range, IQR: 0-0.27] vs. post-CRT 0.05 [IQR: 0.01-0.14] units/day, <i>p</i> = 0.059; modified-dose group: median pre-CRT 0.03 [IQR: 0-0.24] vs. post-CRT 0.07 [IQR: 0.01-0.18] units/day, <i>p</i> = 0.720). In acute leukemia patients with CRT, a platelet-count-guided LMWH regimen was not associated with higher rates of recurrent VTE, hemorrhagic complications, mortality, or platelet transfusion requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":21673,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2905-4225","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Treatment of catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in acute leukemia patients is challenging due to concomitant thrombocytopenia. Although modified-dose anticoagulation is frequently used in this setting, several vital outcomes remain unclear. The current study evaluated clinical outcomes of a platelet-count-guided low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) regimen in these patients. Data on all newly diagnosed acute leukemia patients, who developed CRT, were retrieved from the institutional database. Upon CRT diagnosis, patients received either a full or modified dose of LMWH, based on their platelet counts. Outcomes included recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), hemorrhagic events. Competing risk analyses were performed, with death considered a competing risk. All-cause mortality and blood product utilization (per patient; pre- and postanticoagulation commencement) were compared. A total of 193 acute leukemia patients diagnosed with CRT between November 2004 and May 2022 were included. Eighty-seven patients (45%) received full-dose LMWH. Modified-dose LMWH treatment was associated with hazard ratio (HR) of 0.642 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.268-1.540; p = 0.320) in terms of CRT recurrence and HR of 0.975 (95% CI: 0.439-2.170; p = 0.950) in terms of hemorrhage. Mortality was not significantly higher in the modified-dose group (HR: 1.47, 95% CI: 0.93-2.32; p = 0.092). Notably, platelet requirement did not differ before and after the CRT diagnosis, irrespective of LMWH doses used (full-dose group: median pre-CRT 0.09 [interquartile range, IQR: 0-0.27] vs. post-CRT 0.05 [IQR: 0.01-0.14] units/day, p = 0.059; modified-dose group: median pre-CRT 0.03 [IQR: 0-0.24] vs. post-CRT 0.07 [IQR: 0.01-0.18] units/day, p = 0.720). In acute leukemia patients with CRT, a platelet-count-guided LMWH regimen was not associated with higher rates of recurrent VTE, hemorrhagic complications, mortality, or platelet transfusion requirements.

血小板计数引导的低分子肝素治疗新诊断急性白血病患者导管相关血栓的研究
摘要:急性白血病患者导管相关性血栓形成(CRT)的治疗是具有挑战性的,因为它伴有血小板减少症。虽然在这种情况下经常使用小剂量抗凝,但一些重要的结果仍不清楚。目前的研究评估了血小板计数引导的低分子肝素(LMWH)治疗这些患者的临床结果。所有新诊断的急性白血病患者的数据都是从该机构的数据库中检索的。在CRT诊断后,患者根据血小板计数接受全剂量或修改剂量的低分子肝素治疗。结果包括静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)复发,出血事件。进行竞争风险分析,死亡被认为是竞争风险。全因死亡率和血液制品利用率(每位患者;开始凝血前和凝血后)进行比较。在2004年11月至2022年5月期间,共有193名急性白血病患者被诊断为CRT。87例患者(45%)接受了全剂量低分子肝素治疗。低分子肝素调整剂量治疗与CRT复发率相关的风险比(HR)为0.642(95%可信区间[CI]: 0.268-1.540; p = 0.320),与出血相关的风险比(HR)为0.975 (95% CI: 0.439-2.170; p = 0.950)。调整剂量组的死亡率没有显著升高(HR: 1.47, 95% CI: 0.93-2.32; p = 0.092)。值得注意的是,无论使用的低分子肝素剂量如何,CRT诊断前后血小板需求没有差异(全剂量组:CRT前中位数0.09[四分位数范围,IQR: 0-0.27]与CRT后中位数0.05 [IQR: 0.01-0.14]单位/天,p = 0.059;调整剂量组:CRT前中位数0.03 [IQR: 0-0.24]与CRT后中位数0.07 [IQR: 0.01-0.18]单位/天,p = 0.720)。在接受CRT治疗的急性白血病患者中,血小板计数引导的低分子肝素方案与静脉血栓栓塞复发率、出血性并发症、死亡率或血小板输注要求无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis
Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
21.10%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis is a topic driven review journal that focuses on all issues relating to hemostatic and thrombotic disorders. As one of the premiere review journals in the field, Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis serves as a comprehensive forum for important advances in clinical and laboratory diagnosis and therapeutic interventions. The journal also publishes peer reviewed original research papers. Seminars offers an informed perspective on today''s pivotal issues, including hemophilia A & B, thrombophilia, gene therapy, venous and arterial thrombosis, von Willebrand disease, vascular disorders and thromboembolic diseases. Attention is also given to the latest developments in pharmaceutical drugs along with treatment and current management techniques. The journal also frequently publishes sponsored supplements to further highlight emerging trends in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书