Comparative and Dose-Response Effects of Exercise Modalities on Sleep Quality in Individuals With Breast Cancer: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Yongqing Guo, Xianyang Xin, Xiupeng Li, Pengfei Wang, Zhihao Qi, Qinzheng Liu, Mingyue Jiao, Zhide Liang, Qinlong Liu
{"title":"Comparative and Dose-Response Effects of Exercise Modalities on Sleep Quality in Individuals With Breast Cancer: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Yongqing Guo, Xianyang Xin, Xiupeng Li, Pengfei Wang, Zhihao Qi, Qinzheng Liu, Mingyue Jiao, Zhide Liang, Qinlong Liu","doi":"10.1002/pon.70553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effects of exercise modalities on sleep quality in individuals with breast cancer, and to examine dose-response associations between exercise dose and sleep improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and EBSCO were searched from inception to March 2026. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2. Bayesian multilevel network meta-analysis compared exercise modalities against active controls. Meta-regression and nonlinear dose-response analyses explored effect modifiers and dose-response patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-nine randomized controlled trials involving 4066 participants were included. Compared with active controls, Tai Chi/Qigong showed the largest sleep benefit (Hedges' g = -0.45, 95% CrI: -0.86 to -0.04), followed by yoga and combined exercise (COM; both g = -0.30). Aerobic exercise suggested possible benefit but with uncertainty, whereas resistance training, dance, and stretching showed no clear advantage. Dose-response analyses suggested greater benefits around potentially beneficial moderate-dose ranges, with exploratory estimated values of approximately 4.5 METs, 281.3 MET·min/session, and 910 MET·min/week. Higher baseline Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores were associated with greater sleep improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tai Chi/Qigong, yoga, and COM may be promising exercise modalities for improving sleep quality in this population. Exercise-related sleep benefits may occur within a moderate dose window. Given the very low certainty of evidence and limited head-to-head comparisons, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and confirmed by high-quality randomized controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"35 7","pages":"e70553"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13374674/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70553","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effects of exercise modalities on sleep quality in individuals with breast cancer, and to examine dose-response associations between exercise dose and sleep improvement.

Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and EBSCO were searched from inception to March 2026. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2. Bayesian multilevel network meta-analysis compared exercise modalities against active controls. Meta-regression and nonlinear dose-response analyses explored effect modifiers and dose-response patterns.

Results: Thirty-nine randomized controlled trials involving 4066 participants were included. Compared with active controls, Tai Chi/Qigong showed the largest sleep benefit (Hedges' g = -0.45, 95% CrI: -0.86 to -0.04), followed by yoga and combined exercise (COM; both g = -0.30). Aerobic exercise suggested possible benefit but with uncertainty, whereas resistance training, dance, and stretching showed no clear advantage. Dose-response analyses suggested greater benefits around potentially beneficial moderate-dose ranges, with exploratory estimated values of approximately 4.5 METs, 281.3 MET·min/session, and 910 MET·min/week. Higher baseline Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores were associated with greater sleep improvement.

Conclusions: Tai Chi/Qigong, yoga, and COM may be promising exercise modalities for improving sleep quality in this population. Exercise-related sleep benefits may occur within a moderate dose window. Given the very low certainty of evidence and limited head-to-head comparisons, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and confirmed by high-quality randomized controlled trials.

运动方式对乳腺癌患者睡眠质量的影响:贝叶斯网络meta分析
目的:比较运动方式对乳腺癌患者睡眠质量的影响,并研究运动剂量与睡眠改善之间的剂量-反应关系。方法:检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane Library和EBSCO自成立至2026年3月的文献。偏倚风险采用RoB 2进行评估。贝叶斯多层次网络荟萃分析比较了运动模式和主动对照。元回归和非线性剂量-反应分析探讨了效应修饰因子和剂量-反应模式。结果:纳入39项随机对照试验,共4066名受试者。与积极对照组相比,太极/气功显示出最大的睡眠益处(Hedges' g = -0.45, 95% CrI: -0.86至-0.04),其次是瑜伽和联合运动(COM;两者g = -0.30)。有氧运动可能有好处,但不确定,而阻力训练、舞蹈和拉伸没有明显的好处。剂量-反应分析表明,在潜在有益的中等剂量范围内,更大的益处,探索性估值约为4.5 MET、281.3 MET·min/次和910 MET·min/周。匹兹堡睡眠质量指数得分越高,睡眠质量越好。结论:太极/气功、瑜伽和COM可能是改善这一人群睡眠质量的有希望的运动方式。运动相关的睡眠益处可能在中等剂量范围内发生。鉴于证据的确定性非常低,且正面比较有限,这些发现应谨慎解释,并通过高质量的随机对照试验加以证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psycho‐Oncology
Psycho‐Oncology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
220
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology. This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues. Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书