Cross-sectional associations between occupational exposure profiles in daycares, evaluated from chemical composition of disinfectants and cleaning products, and asthma symptoms.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Emilie Pacheco Da Silva, Emmanuel Chevallier, Laurent Orsi, Etienne Sevin, Corinne Mandin, Valérie Siroux, Felix Forster, Orianne Dumas, Nicole Le Moual
{"title":"Cross-sectional associations between occupational exposure profiles in daycares, evaluated from chemical composition of disinfectants and cleaning products, and asthma symptoms.","authors":"Emilie Pacheco Da Silva, Emmanuel Chevallier, Laurent Orsi, Etienne Sevin, Corinne Mandin, Valérie Siroux, Felix Forster, Orianne Dumas, Nicole Le Moual","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2025-110626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While adverse respiratory health effects of exposure to disinfectants and cleaning products (DCPs) are well-documented in cleaners/healthcare workers, no study has investigated their impact on daycare workers. We evaluated cross-sectional associations between occupational exposures to DCPs, considering them as a mixture of chemical compounds and asthma in CRESPI daycare workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Use of DCPs in daycares was assessed using a smartphone application. We retrieved their chemical compounds, classifying them as irritants, sensitisers, quaternary ammonium compounds and biocides. Latent class analysis (LCA) was conducted to identify exposure profiles for the weekly used DCPs/compounds. We assessed associations of the identified exposure profiles with the asthma symptom score (0-5) using negative binomial regressions, adjusted for age, smoking status and body mass index and accounted for daycare centre.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses included 311 women (43 years, people who smoke: 11%). The LCA identified three exposure profiles: no weekly use of DCPs (LC1 prevalence: 24%), weekly use of a moderate number of irritants (LC2: 37%), weekly use of a high number of irritants, respiratory sensitisers and biocides (LC3: 39%). Women in LC2 and LC3 had a higher risk for asthma symptoms compared with those in LC1. The association was borderline statistically significant for LC3 (mean score ratio (MSR)=1.56; 95% CI 0.99 to 2.46) and weaker for LC2 (MSR=1.34 95% CI 0.85 to 2.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results show positive associations between weekly occupational use of numerous DCPs and those with multiple types of chemical compounds in daycares and asthma symptoms in daycare workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"268-275"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2025-110626","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: While adverse respiratory health effects of exposure to disinfectants and cleaning products (DCPs) are well-documented in cleaners/healthcare workers, no study has investigated their impact on daycare workers. We evaluated cross-sectional associations between occupational exposures to DCPs, considering them as a mixture of chemical compounds and asthma in CRESPI daycare workers.

Methods: Use of DCPs in daycares was assessed using a smartphone application. We retrieved their chemical compounds, classifying them as irritants, sensitisers, quaternary ammonium compounds and biocides. Latent class analysis (LCA) was conducted to identify exposure profiles for the weekly used DCPs/compounds. We assessed associations of the identified exposure profiles with the asthma symptom score (0-5) using negative binomial regressions, adjusted for age, smoking status and body mass index and accounted for daycare centre.

Results: Analyses included 311 women (43 years, people who smoke: 11%). The LCA identified three exposure profiles: no weekly use of DCPs (LC1 prevalence: 24%), weekly use of a moderate number of irritants (LC2: 37%), weekly use of a high number of irritants, respiratory sensitisers and biocides (LC3: 39%). Women in LC2 and LC3 had a higher risk for asthma symptoms compared with those in LC1. The association was borderline statistically significant for LC3 (mean score ratio (MSR)=1.56; 95% CI 0.99 to 2.46) and weaker for LC2 (MSR=1.34 95% CI 0.85 to 2.13).

Conclusion: Our results show positive associations between weekly occupational use of numerous DCPs and those with multiple types of chemical compounds in daycares and asthma symptoms in daycare workers.

根据消毒剂和清洁产品的化学成分评估的日托职业暴露概况与哮喘症状之间的横断面关联。
目的:虽然暴露于消毒剂和清洁产品(dcp)对呼吸道健康的不良影响在清洁工/卫生保健工作者中有充分的记录,但没有研究调查过它们对日托工作者的影响。我们评估了职业暴露于dcp之间的横断面关联,将其视为化合物和CRESPI日托工作者哮喘的混合物。方法:使用智能手机应用程序评估日托中心dcp的使用情况。我们检索了它们的化学成分,将它们分类为刺激物、敏化剂、季铵化合物和杀菌剂。进行潜在类分析(LCA)以确定每周使用的dcp /化合物的暴露概况。我们使用负二项回归评估了已确定的暴露情况与哮喘症状评分(0-5)的关联,调整了年龄、吸烟状况和体重指数,并考虑了日托中心。结果:分析包括311名女性(43岁,吸烟者占11%)。LCA确定了三种暴露概况:每周不使用dcp (LC1患病率:24%),每周使用中等数量的刺激物(LC2: 37%),每周使用大量刺激物、呼吸致敏剂和杀菌剂(LC3: 39%)。与LC1组相比,LC2和LC3组的女性患哮喘症状的风险更高。LC3的相关性具有临界统计学意义(平均评分比(MSR)=1.56;95% CI 0.99至2.46),LC2较弱(MSR=1.34, 95% CI 0.85至2.13)。结论:我们的研究结果显示,日托人员每周使用大量dcp与日托人员使用多种化合物和哮喘症状呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Occupational and Environmental Medicine is an international peer reviewed journal covering current developments in occupational and environmental health worldwide. Occupational and Environmental Medicine publishes high-quality research relating to the full range of chemical, physical, ergonomic, biological and psychosocial hazards in the workplace and to environmental contaminants and their health effects. The journal welcomes research aimed at improving the evidence-based practice of occupational and environmental research; including the development and application of novel biological and statistical techniques in addition to evaluation of interventions in controlling occupational and environmental risks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书