{"title":"Within-Day Patterns of Self-Monitoring Dietary Intake and Weight Loss in a Behavioral Weight Management Program.","authors":"Andrea Brockmann, Jaime Ruiz, Kathryn M Ross","doi":"10.1002/osp4.70174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Behavioral weight management programs (BWLPs) encourage participants to self-monitor dietary intake daily, preferably throughout the day as eating/drinking occurs. Despite empirical support for <i>daily</i> self-monitoring, little is known regarding within-day patterns of self-monitoring and their associations with weight loss.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Within-day patterns of self-monitoring and associations with weight loss were examined in 449 adults with obesity (mean ± SD age = 49.4 ± 11.4 years, BMI = 35.7 ± 4.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, 83.5% female, 23.4% Black or African American, 9.8% Hispanic) who enrolled in a 16 week BWLP and were asked to self-monitor dietary intake daily using a smartphone app.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>K-means cluster analysis resulted in four patterns: participants who primarily engaged in <i>Minimal Logging</i> (<i>n</i> = 101), <i>Backlogging</i> (<i>n</i> = 124), <i>Logging one occasion/day</i> (<i>n</i> = 59), and <i>Logging two or more occasions/day</i> (<i>n</i> = 165). There was not a difference in weight loss between <i>Logging two or more occasions/day</i> (<i>M</i> ± SD; 9.1 ± 4.1%) and <i>Logging one occasion/day</i> (7.7 ± 4.7%), <i>p</i> = 0.219; however, both lost more weight than <i>Backlogging</i> (5.7 ± 4.1%) and <i>Minimal logging</i> (2.1 ± 3.4%), <i>p</i>s < 0.001. Moreover, 88.5% of <i>Logging two or more occasions/day</i> participants achieved clinically-meaningful weight losses, compared to 71.2% of <i>Logging one occasion/day</i>, 55.6% of <i>Backlogging</i>, and 19.8% of <i>Minimal Logging</i>, all <i>p</i>s < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results support recommendations for daily (and, ideally, throughout-the-day) self-monitoring of dietary intake. Future studies should investigate strategies to increase self-monitoring adherence, including technological supports and lower-burden tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":19448,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Science & Practice","volume":"12 4","pages":"e70174"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13373301/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Science & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.70174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Behavioral weight management programs (BWLPs) encourage participants to self-monitor dietary intake daily, preferably throughout the day as eating/drinking occurs. Despite empirical support for daily self-monitoring, little is known regarding within-day patterns of self-monitoring and their associations with weight loss.
Methods: Within-day patterns of self-monitoring and associations with weight loss were examined in 449 adults with obesity (mean ± SD age = 49.4 ± 11.4 years, BMI = 35.7 ± 4.0 kg/m2, 83.5% female, 23.4% Black or African American, 9.8% Hispanic) who enrolled in a 16 week BWLP and were asked to self-monitor dietary intake daily using a smartphone app.
Results: K-means cluster analysis resulted in four patterns: participants who primarily engaged in Minimal Logging (n = 101), Backlogging (n = 124), Logging one occasion/day (n = 59), and Logging two or more occasions/day (n = 165). There was not a difference in weight loss between Logging two or more occasions/day (M ± SD; 9.1 ± 4.1%) and Logging one occasion/day (7.7 ± 4.7%), p = 0.219; however, both lost more weight than Backlogging (5.7 ± 4.1%) and Minimal logging (2.1 ± 3.4%), ps < 0.001. Moreover, 88.5% of Logging two or more occasions/day participants achieved clinically-meaningful weight losses, compared to 71.2% of Logging one occasion/day, 55.6% of Backlogging, and 19.8% of Minimal Logging, all ps < 0.05.
Conclusions: Results support recommendations for daily (and, ideally, throughout-the-day) self-monitoring of dietary intake. Future studies should investigate strategies to increase self-monitoring adherence, including technological supports and lower-burden tools.