Tanguy Bouget, Marine Lottin, Abeer Najem, Sahir Javed, Marine Marrucho, Julien Elices-Diez, Pierre-Yves Cren, Marie-Cécile Le Deley, Nicolas Penel, Aurélien Carnot, Gautier Marcq, Alexandra Forestier
{"title":"Fat Mass and Survival in Immunotherapy-Treated Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients.","authors":"Tanguy Bouget, Marine Lottin, Abeer Najem, Sahir Javed, Marine Marrucho, Julien Elices-Diez, Pierre-Yves Cren, Marie-Cécile Le Deley, Nicolas Penel, Aurélien Carnot, Gautier Marcq, Alexandra Forestier","doi":"10.1159/000552741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely prescribed as the first-line treatment for metastatic renal clear-cell carcinoma because of their overall survival (OS) benefits. However, ICIs are associated with unreliable efficacy and sometimes severe and unpredictable toxicities. There is a lack of biomarkers for efficacy or toxicity beyond the IMDC score. Body composition (fat and muscle mass) may also be a biomarker of interest. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the association between body composition, OS, and toxicities in patients with RCC treated with ICI as a first-line metastatic treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Body composition parameters - subcutaneous fat index (SFI), visceral fat index (VFI), total fat index (TFI), and skeletal muscle index (SMI) - were measured on computed tomography scans using semiautomated software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 71 patients, no significant association was found between TFI and OS (adjusted HR, 0.71 [0.35; 1.45]) or toxicities. The TFI was strongly correlated with BMI (r = 0.81), whereas the SFI and VFI were weakly correlated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Larger studies would be valuable to better define the thresholds of different parameters (SFI, VFI, TFI, and SMI) and their association with the efficacy and toxicity of ICI.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000552741","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely prescribed as the first-line treatment for metastatic renal clear-cell carcinoma because of their overall survival (OS) benefits. However, ICIs are associated with unreliable efficacy and sometimes severe and unpredictable toxicities. There is a lack of biomarkers for efficacy or toxicity beyond the IMDC score. Body composition (fat and muscle mass) may also be a biomarker of interest. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the association between body composition, OS, and toxicities in patients with RCC treated with ICI as a first-line metastatic treatment.
Methods: Body composition parameters - subcutaneous fat index (SFI), visceral fat index (VFI), total fat index (TFI), and skeletal muscle index (SMI) - were measured on computed tomography scans using semiautomated software.
Results: In 71 patients, no significant association was found between TFI and OS (adjusted HR, 0.71 [0.35; 1.45]) or toxicities. The TFI was strongly correlated with BMI (r = 0.81), whereas the SFI and VFI were weakly correlated.
Conclusion: Larger studies would be valuable to better define the thresholds of different parameters (SFI, VFI, TFI, and SMI) and their association with the efficacy and toxicity of ICI.
期刊介绍:
Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.