What has population genomics told us about the dynamics of selection and plant adaptation?

IF 6.4 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Brandon S Gaut, Stephen I Wright, Tianpeng Wang, Peter L Morrell
{"title":"What has population genomics told us about the dynamics of selection and plant adaptation?","authors":"Brandon S Gaut, Stephen I Wright, Tianpeng Wang, Peter L Morrell","doi":"10.1093/molbev/msag171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Population genomics has transformed our understanding of how natural selection shapes plant genomes. The explosion of whole-genome resequencing data has enabled estimates of nucleotide diversity across genomes, clarified how selection interacts with recombination and demography, and broadened inference beyond crops and model species to virtually any plant system. Here, we synthesize key lessons and outstanding challenges concerning the action of natural selection on plant genomes. One message is that purifying selection is a pervasive selective force acting against deleterious mutations and structural variants, but its efficacy varies predictably and is often relaxed after demographic contractions, including domestication bottlenecks, range expansions, shifts in mating systems, and polyploid formation. Adaptation also routinely shapes genetic diversity, as evidenced by the detection of selective sweeps. Swept genes have functional biases, but many outstanding questions about adaptive variation remain, including the selection coefficients of adaptive alleles, whether selection typically acts on segregating variants or de novo mutations, and how often selection is polygenic. As with polygenic selection, our knowledge about balancing selection is limited, due in part to challenges in its detection. It is known, however, to act on disease-resistance genes and genes that govern breeding systems. Finally, an emerging theme in plant population genomics is the interplay between introgression and adaptation, but it remains challenging to link introgression confidently to fitness, and further study requires an expanded, multispecies scale. This review reveals the power, and some of the limits, of population genomics to infer the dynamics of selection on plant genomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18730,"journal":{"name":"Molecular biology and evolution","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13455019/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular biology and evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msag171","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Population genomics has transformed our understanding of how natural selection shapes plant genomes. The explosion of whole-genome resequencing data has enabled estimates of nucleotide diversity across genomes, clarified how selection interacts with recombination and demography, and broadened inference beyond crops and model species to virtually any plant system. Here, we synthesize key lessons and outstanding challenges concerning the action of natural selection on plant genomes. One message is that purifying selection is a pervasive selective force acting against deleterious mutations and structural variants, but its efficacy varies predictably and is often relaxed after demographic contractions, including domestication bottlenecks, range expansions, shifts in mating systems, and polyploid formation. Adaptation also routinely shapes genetic diversity, as evidenced by the detection of selective sweeps. Swept genes have functional biases, but many outstanding questions about adaptive variation remain, including the selection coefficients of adaptive alleles, whether selection typically acts on segregating variants or de novo mutations, and how often selection is polygenic. As with polygenic selection, our knowledge about balancing selection is limited, due in part to challenges in its detection. It is known, however, to act on disease-resistance genes and genes that govern breeding systems. Finally, an emerging theme in plant population genomics is the interplay between introgression and adaptation, but it remains challenging to link introgression confidently to fitness, and further study requires an expanded, multispecies scale. This review reveals the power, and some of the limits, of population genomics to infer the dynamics of selection on plant genomes.

种群基因组学告诉我们关于选择和植物适应的动态?
种群基因组学改变了我们对自然选择如何塑造植物基因组的理解。全基因组重测序数据的爆炸式增长使跨基因组核苷酸多样性的估计成为可能,阐明了选择如何与重组和人口统计学相互作用,并将推断范围从作物和模式物种扩大到几乎任何植物系统。在此,我们综合了自然选择对植物基因组作用的主要教训和突出挑战。一个信息是,净化选择是一种普遍存在的选择力量,用于对抗有害的突变和结构变异,但其效力变化是可预测的,并且在人口收缩后通常会放松,包括驯化瓶颈、范围扩大、交配系统的变化和多倍体的形成。适应性也经常塑造遗传多样性,选择性清除的检测证明了这一点。被扫过的基因具有功能偏差,但关于适应性变异的许多悬而未决的问题仍然存在,包括适应性等位基因的选择系数,选择是否典型地作用于分离变异或新生突变,以及选择是多基因的频率。与多基因选择一样,我们对平衡选择的了解有限,部分原因在于其检测方面的挑战。然而,已知它作用于抗病基因和控制育种系统的基因。最后,植物种群基因组学的一个新兴主题是遗传渗入和适应之间的相互作用,这是由新方法推动的,但将其与适应性联系起来仍然具有挑战性,并且需要扩大规模。这一综述揭示了群体基因组学在解决植物基因组选择动力学方面的能力和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular biology and evolution
Molecular biology and evolution 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
19.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
257
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Biology and Evolution Journal Overview: Publishes research at the interface of molecular (including genomics) and evolutionary biology Considers manuscripts containing patterns, processes, and predictions at all levels of organization: population, taxonomic, functional, and phenotypic Interested in fundamental discoveries, new and improved methods, resources, technologies, and theories advancing evolutionary research Publishes balanced reviews of recent developments in genome evolution and forward-looking perspectives suggesting future directions in molecular evolution applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书