Probing Ovarian Stiffness in Healthy Volunteers With 3D Magnetic Resonance Elastography

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pub Date : 2026-10-14 Epub Date: 2026-07-17 DOI:10.1002/jmri.70455
Huiting Cao, Feng Jin, Qiang Liu, Wen Zhang, Yun Chen, Yu Shi, Wenxu Qi
{"title":"Probing Ovarian Stiffness in Healthy Volunteers With 3D Magnetic Resonance Elastography","authors":"Huiting Cao,&nbsp;Feng Jin,&nbsp;Qiang Liu,&nbsp;Wen Zhang,&nbsp;Yun Chen,&nbsp;Yu Shi,&nbsp;Wenxu Qi","doi":"10.1002/jmri.70455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The feasibility of multi-frequency magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) for ovarian assessment, normative stiffness values, and related influencing factors in the general population remains unclear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate ovarian MRE feasibility, preferred frequency, normative stiffness, and influencing factors in healthy individuals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Type</h3>\n \n <p>Prospective.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Subjects</h3>\n \n <p>About 55 healthy female volunteers (median age: 42; median body mass index (BMI): 23).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Field Strength/Sequence</h3>\n \n <p>3 T; spin-echo echo-planar imaging sequence at 40, 60, and 80 Hz.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Assessment</h3>\n \n <p>Quality-control metrics and ovarian stiffness values (left and right) were measured for all participants. Image quality was evaluated by IQS (1–4; diagnostic images ≥ 3) and confidence percentage.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Statistical Tests</h3>\n \n <p>Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); ANOVA; multivariate linear regression; significance level, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Quality-control metrics, including fixed-ROI average phase SD [138.63 (106.17–177.74), 127.90 (97.77–186.46), and 133.70 (92.73–185.79)] and average within-ROI phase range [605.25 (468.43–777.50), 604.00 (432.83–821.50), and 607.00 (442.00–804.80)] at 40, 60, and 80 Hz, showed no significant frequency-dependent variation (both <i>p</i> = 0.947), confirming no substantial vibration-induced phase artifacts. Combined with good-to-excellent reproducibility (ICCs: 0.897–0.999), these data supported the feasibility of ovarian MRE. Among tested frequencies, 60 Hz showed relatively favorable image quality, the highest IQS agreement (inter-reader/intra-reader weighted <i>κ</i> = 0.828–0.891/0.862–0.877). Ovarian stiffness ranges were 1.56–2.91, 2.91–3.70, and 3.10–3.89 kPa in the premenopausal, perimenopausal, and postmenopausal groups, respectively. Ovarian stiffness remained stable across menstrual-cycle phases in either ovary (left/right: <i>p</i> = 0.250/0.358, 0.986/0.858, 0.088/0.476, 0.249/0.448, 0.633/0.185, and 0.120/0.706). Regression analysis identified age and BMI as independent predictors of ovarian stiffness; age had a larger standardized <i>β</i> than BMI (0.868 vs. 0.176), as did menopausal status when replacing age (0.832 vs. 0.213).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>About 60 Hz provided appropriate MRE images in healthy volunteers. Ovarian stiffness was influenced by menopausal status, age, and BMI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Evidence Level</h3>\n \n <p>2.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Technical Efficacy</h3>\n \n <p>Stage 1.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","volume":"64 5","pages":"1215-1226"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmri.70455","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The feasibility of multi-frequency magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) for ovarian assessment, normative stiffness values, and related influencing factors in the general population remains unclear.

Purpose

To evaluate ovarian MRE feasibility, preferred frequency, normative stiffness, and influencing factors in healthy individuals.

Study Type

Prospective.

Subjects

About 55 healthy female volunteers (median age: 42; median body mass index (BMI): 23).

Field Strength/Sequence

3 T; spin-echo echo-planar imaging sequence at 40, 60, and 80 Hz.

Assessment

Quality-control metrics and ovarian stiffness values (left and right) were measured for all participants. Image quality was evaluated by IQS (1–4; diagnostic images ≥ 3) and confidence percentage.

Statistical Tests

Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); ANOVA; multivariate linear regression; significance level, p < 0.05.

Results

Quality-control metrics, including fixed-ROI average phase SD [138.63 (106.17–177.74), 127.90 (97.77–186.46), and 133.70 (92.73–185.79)] and average within-ROI phase range [605.25 (468.43–777.50), 604.00 (432.83–821.50), and 607.00 (442.00–804.80)] at 40, 60, and 80 Hz, showed no significant frequency-dependent variation (both p = 0.947), confirming no substantial vibration-induced phase artifacts. Combined with good-to-excellent reproducibility (ICCs: 0.897–0.999), these data supported the feasibility of ovarian MRE. Among tested frequencies, 60 Hz showed relatively favorable image quality, the highest IQS agreement (inter-reader/intra-reader weighted κ = 0.828–0.891/0.862–0.877). Ovarian stiffness ranges were 1.56–2.91, 2.91–3.70, and 3.10–3.89 kPa in the premenopausal, perimenopausal, and postmenopausal groups, respectively. Ovarian stiffness remained stable across menstrual-cycle phases in either ovary (left/right: p = 0.250/0.358, 0.986/0.858, 0.088/0.476, 0.249/0.448, 0.633/0.185, and 0.120/0.706). Regression analysis identified age and BMI as independent predictors of ovarian stiffness; age had a larger standardized β than BMI (0.868 vs. 0.176), as did menopausal status when replacing age (0.832 vs. 0.213).

Data Conclusions

About 60 Hz provided appropriate MRE images in healthy volunteers. Ovarian stiffness was influenced by menopausal status, age, and BMI.

Evidence Level

2.

Technical Efficacy

Stage 1.

用三维磁共振弹性成像探测健康志愿者卵巢僵硬度。
背景:在普通人群中,多频磁共振弹性成像(MRE)用于卵巢评估、规范刚度值和相关影响因素的可行性尚不清楚。目的:评价健康人卵巢MRE的可行性、首选频率、规范刚度及影响因素。研究类型:前瞻性。受试者:约55名健康女性志愿者(年龄中位数:42;身体质量指数中位数(BMI): 23)。场强/序列:3t;40、60和80 Hz的自旋回波回波平面成像序列。评估:测量所有参与者的质量控制指标和卵巢僵硬值(左和右)。采用iq(1-4;诊断图像≥3)和置信度评价图像质量。统计检验:类内相关系数(ICC);方差分析;多元线性回归;结果:质量控制指标,包括固定roi平均相位SD[138.63(106.17-177.74), 127.90(97.77-186.46)和133.70(92.73-185.79)]和roi内平均相位范围[605.25(468.43-777.50),604.00(432.83-821.50)和607.00(442.00-804.80)]在40,60和80 Hz下,没有显着的频率相关变化(p均= 0.947),证实没有实质性的振动引起的相位伪影。结合良好到优异的重现性(ICCs: 0.897-0.999),这些数据支持卵巢MRE的可行性。在测试频率中,60 Hz的图像质量相对较好,IQS一致性最高(读写器间/读写器内加权κ = 0.828-0.891/0.862-0.877)。绝经前组、围绝经期组、绝经后组卵巢僵硬度范围分别为1.56 ~ 2.91、2.91 ~ 3.70、3.10 ~ 3.89 kPa。卵巢僵硬度在两个月经周期阶段保持稳定(左/右:p = 0.250/0.358, 0.986/0.858, 0.088/0.476, 0.249/0.448, 0.633/0.185, 0.120/0.706)。回归分析发现年龄和BMI是卵巢僵硬的独立预测因子;年龄的标准化β大于BMI (0.868 vs. 0.176),替代年龄时绝经状态的标准化β也大于BMI (0.832 vs. 0.213)。数据结论:在健康志愿者中,约60 Hz提供合适的MRE图像。卵巢僵硬程度受绝经状态、年龄和BMI的影响。证据等级:2。技术功效:第一阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.80%
发文量
494
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (JMRI) is an international journal devoted to the timely publication of basic and clinical research, educational and review articles, and other information related to the diagnostic applications of magnetic resonance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书