A machine learning approach to identify at-risk populations for yellow fever vaccination.

IF 2.7 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2026-06-01 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2026.10754
Madison Farnsworth, Kostiantyn Botnar, Justin T Nguyen, Riley K Watson, Trevor L Murphy, Susan L F McLellan, Kamil Khanipov, George Golovko
{"title":"A machine learning approach to identify at-risk populations for yellow fever vaccination.","authors":"Madison Farnsworth, Kostiantyn Botnar, Justin T Nguyen, Riley K Watson, Trevor L Murphy, Susan L F McLellan, Kamil Khanipov, George Golovko","doi":"10.1017/cts.2026.10754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vaccinations play a crucial role in public and personal health. Vaccines such as the Yellow Fever 17D vaccine are effective at preventing disease and provide lifelong immunity with few adverse events. Leveraging the increase in electronic medical records and the widespread use of machine learning algorithms in healthcare, this study aims to investigate and develop an algorithmic framework for analyzing clinical data on Yellow Fever 17D vaccinations in order to predict at-risk populations for adverse events following immunizations. This research incorporates parameters from the patient's medical history and demographic information.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To build our analytic framework, we tested five machine learning algorithms: random forest, gradient boost, logistic regression, XGBoost, and Bernoulli naïve Bayes. We cleaned and managed the datasets through EHRchitect software. We assessed the performance of the algorithms using standard metrics, including precision, recall, F1-scores, accuracy, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Additionally, we implemented population sampling to mitigate potential biases common in clinical data and performed parameter ranking analysis to identify the most influential features in classifying patient reaction outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that logistic regression produced the highest performance, and through hyperparameter optimization, we developed a framework with precision, accuracy, and ROC scores of 87.7%, 99.0%, and 0.818, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, this study examined five modeling algorithms to establish a framework for analyzing real-world data and to predict at-risk populations for adverse events following immunization. We incorporated a logistic regression algorithm to assess our clinical data to achieve a high-precision performance model for classifying patient predictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"e106"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13373601/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2026.10754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Vaccinations play a crucial role in public and personal health. Vaccines such as the Yellow Fever 17D vaccine are effective at preventing disease and provide lifelong immunity with few adverse events. Leveraging the increase in electronic medical records and the widespread use of machine learning algorithms in healthcare, this study aims to investigate and develop an algorithmic framework for analyzing clinical data on Yellow Fever 17D vaccinations in order to predict at-risk populations for adverse events following immunizations. This research incorporates parameters from the patient's medical history and demographic information.

Methods: To build our analytic framework, we tested five machine learning algorithms: random forest, gradient boost, logistic regression, XGBoost, and Bernoulli naïve Bayes. We cleaned and managed the datasets through EHRchitect software. We assessed the performance of the algorithms using standard metrics, including precision, recall, F1-scores, accuracy, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Additionally, we implemented population sampling to mitigate potential biases common in clinical data and performed parameter ranking analysis to identify the most influential features in classifying patient reaction outcomes.

Results: We found that logistic regression produced the highest performance, and through hyperparameter optimization, we developed a framework with precision, accuracy, and ROC scores of 87.7%, 99.0%, and 0.818, respectively.

Conclusion: In conclusion, this study examined five modeling algorithms to establish a framework for analyzing real-world data and to predict at-risk populations for adverse events following immunization. We incorporated a logistic regression algorithm to assess our clinical data to achieve a high-precision performance model for classifying patient predictions.

确定黄热病疫苗接种风险人群的机器学习方法。
疫苗接种在公共和个人健康中起着至关重要的作用。黄热病17D疫苗等疫苗可有效预防疾病,并提供终生免疫,几乎没有不良事件。利用电子医疗记录的增加和医疗保健中机器学习算法的广泛使用,本研究旨在调查和开发一个算法框架,用于分析黄热病17D疫苗接种的临床数据,以预测免疫接种后不良事件的高危人群。这项研究纳入了患者病史和人口统计信息的参数。方法:为了构建我们的分析框架,我们测试了五种机器学习算法:随机森林、梯度增强、逻辑回归、XGBoost和伯努利naïve贝叶斯。我们通过EHRchitect软件清理和管理数据集。我们使用标准指标评估算法的性能,包括精度、召回率、f1分数、准确度和接收者工作特征曲线下的面积。此外,我们实施了群体抽样,以减轻临床数据中常见的潜在偏差,并进行参数排序分析,以确定对患者反应结果分类最具影响力的特征。结果:我们发现逻辑回归产生了最高的性能,并且通过超参数优化,我们开发了一个精度,准确度和ROC评分分别为87.7%,99.0%和0.818的框架。结论:总之,本研究检验了五种建模算法,以建立一个分析真实世界数据的框架,并预测免疫接种后不良事件的高危人群。我们采用逻辑回归算法来评估我们的临床数据,以实现对患者预测分类的高精度性能模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书