{"title":"Recovery Latency as a Dynamic Biomarker of Adaptive Capacity.","authors":"Alvaro Alaor Silva","doi":"10.1123/ijspp.2026-0111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine Recovery Latency (RL) as a candidate temporal marker of adaptive capacity by assessing whether recovery dynamics can be consistently quantified across independent sport and physiological data sets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 23 unique data sets (∼230,000 observations) were analyzed including athletic performance cohorts, injury surveillance systems, and heart rate variability-based recovery studies. RL was defined as the time required for recovery proxies to return to an individualized rolling baseline following high-load events. Analyses focused on sport-performance contexts, with additional data sets included as exploratory extensions. Associations with autonomic and performance-related variables were evaluated using correlation analyses and predictive modeling. The Dynamic Adaptive Capacity framework was explored as a potential application of RL dynamics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preliminary evidence suggests that RL captures variation in recovery dynamics. RL showed high apparent discriminative performance for overtraining risk (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.934) and was associated with physiological markers including cortisol (r = .631) and heart rate variability (r = -.644). Longitudinal analysis identified 28,472 RL events across 74 athletes, with 60% exhibiting a positive RL slope suggesting progressive changes in recovery dynamics across individuals. Patterns were consistent with expected physiological responses to training load and stress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that RL may be relevant in sport-performance contexts; however, they should be interpreted as exploratory and hypothesis-generating rather than as evidence of validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14295,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2026-0111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To examine Recovery Latency (RL) as a candidate temporal marker of adaptive capacity by assessing whether recovery dynamics can be consistently quantified across independent sport and physiological data sets.
Methods: A total of 23 unique data sets (∼230,000 observations) were analyzed including athletic performance cohorts, injury surveillance systems, and heart rate variability-based recovery studies. RL was defined as the time required for recovery proxies to return to an individualized rolling baseline following high-load events. Analyses focused on sport-performance contexts, with additional data sets included as exploratory extensions. Associations with autonomic and performance-related variables were evaluated using correlation analyses and predictive modeling. The Dynamic Adaptive Capacity framework was explored as a potential application of RL dynamics.
Results: Preliminary evidence suggests that RL captures variation in recovery dynamics. RL showed high apparent discriminative performance for overtraining risk (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.934) and was associated with physiological markers including cortisol (r = .631) and heart rate variability (r = -.644). Longitudinal analysis identified 28,472 RL events across 74 athletes, with 60% exhibiting a positive RL slope suggesting progressive changes in recovery dynamics across individuals. Patterns were consistent with expected physiological responses to training load and stress.
Conclusion: These findings suggest that RL may be relevant in sport-performance contexts; however, they should be interpreted as exploratory and hypothesis-generating rather than as evidence of validation.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (IJSPP) focuses on sport physiology and performance and is dedicated to advancing the knowledge of sport and exercise physiologists, sport-performance researchers, and other sport scientists. The journal publishes authoritative peer-reviewed research in sport physiology and related disciplines, with an emphasis on work having direct practical applications in enhancing sport performance in sport physiology and related disciplines. IJSPP publishes 10 issues per year: January, February, March, April, May, July, August, September, October, and November.