Amer M Zeidan, Ruizhi Zhao, Dina Christensen, Janan Amin, Thomas W LeBlanc
{"title":"The burden of acute myeloid leukemia: an integrated review of clinical, economic, and patient-centered evidence.","authors":"Amer M Zeidan, Ruizhi Zhao, Dina Christensen, Janan Amin, Thomas W LeBlanc","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2026.2705531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive hematologic cancer that accounts for approximately one third of all newly diagnosed leukemias annually in the United States (US), and is associated with high mortality and substantial clinical, economic and patient burden.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Prior reviews have explored AML disease burden from isolated epidemiological, treatment, or cost perspectives. In this narrative review, we integrate the published evidence identified through targeted searches of PubMed and Google Scholar conducted between June 2025 and July 2026. Literature published between 2006 and 2026 addressing the epidemiologic, clinical, economic and humanistic burden of AML was reviewed to characterize unmet needs across the continuum of care, from diagnosis and treatment selection to patient outcomes including remission, relapse, and death.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Significant unmet needs persist across all burden dimensions, particularly for older patients and those ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Therefore, expanded access to targeted therapies, oral regimens, and supportive care models has the potential to enhance health-related quality of life and reduce 'time toxicity/burden' for patients. The multifaceted aspects of AML burden necessitate a treatment approach that balances safety and efficacy with patient preference and patient-centered value, to optimize outcomes for patients, caregivers, and healthcare systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2026.2705531","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive hematologic cancer that accounts for approximately one third of all newly diagnosed leukemias annually in the United States (US), and is associated with high mortality and substantial clinical, economic and patient burden.
Areas covered: Prior reviews have explored AML disease burden from isolated epidemiological, treatment, or cost perspectives. In this narrative review, we integrate the published evidence identified through targeted searches of PubMed and Google Scholar conducted between June 2025 and July 2026. Literature published between 2006 and 2026 addressing the epidemiologic, clinical, economic and humanistic burden of AML was reviewed to characterize unmet needs across the continuum of care, from diagnosis and treatment selection to patient outcomes including remission, relapse, and death.
Expert opinion: Significant unmet needs persist across all burden dimensions, particularly for older patients and those ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Therefore, expanded access to targeted therapies, oral regimens, and supportive care models has the potential to enhance health-related quality of life and reduce 'time toxicity/burden' for patients. The multifaceted aspects of AML burden necessitate a treatment approach that balances safety and efficacy with patient preference and patient-centered value, to optimize outcomes for patients, caregivers, and healthcare systems.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches.
Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care.
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.