Efficacy of Contouring-Assisted Resection in the Crus of Helix Cartilage Region for Congenital Preauricular Fistula.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Jichan Wang, Juntian Lang
{"title":"Efficacy of Contouring-Assisted Resection in the Crus of Helix Cartilage Region for Congenital Preauricular Fistula.","authors":"Jichan Wang, Juntian Lang","doi":"10.62713/aic.4590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study comparatively evaluates the efficacy and safety of contouring-assisted resection versus traditional fistula tract excision in the crus of helix cartilage region for the treatment of congenital preauricular fistula (CPF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study recruited 198 CPF patients who underwent surgical treatment at Ruijin Hospital between January 2018 and June 2024. Based on surgical technique, patients were divided into a contouring group (n = 98), who underwent contouring-assisted resection involving systematic dissection along the anterior and deep surfaces of the crus of helix cartilage while preserving the cartilage framework, and a traditional surgery group (n = 100), who underwent conventional fistula tract identification and excision. Baseline characteristics, recurrence rate, operative time, postoperative complications, and patient satisfaction were statistically compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The recurrence rate was significantly lower in the contouring group than in the traditional group (2.0% vs. 18.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Patients in the contouring group experienced significantly longer operative time (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while intraoperative blood loss did not differ significantly between groups. The overall complication rate was significantly lower in the contouring group (4.1% vs. 20.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), with a particularly reduced rate of incision-related infection in this group (1.0% vs. 8.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.044). Patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the contouring group (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The contouring-assisted resection approach was associated with a significantly lower recurrence rate and higher patient satisfaction compared with traditional fistula tract excision, without an increase in specific complications such as chondritis, hematoma requiring intervention, or persistent sensory abnormality. These observations suggest this method is an effective and safe surgical option for patients with CPF in the crus of the helix region.</p>","PeriodicalId":8210,"journal":{"name":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","volume":"97 7","pages":"1146-1152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.4590","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study comparatively evaluates the efficacy and safety of contouring-assisted resection versus traditional fistula tract excision in the crus of helix cartilage region for the treatment of congenital preauricular fistula (CPF).

Methods: This retrospective cohort study recruited 198 CPF patients who underwent surgical treatment at Ruijin Hospital between January 2018 and June 2024. Based on surgical technique, patients were divided into a contouring group (n = 98), who underwent contouring-assisted resection involving systematic dissection along the anterior and deep surfaces of the crus of helix cartilage while preserving the cartilage framework, and a traditional surgery group (n = 100), who underwent conventional fistula tract identification and excision. Baseline characteristics, recurrence rate, operative time, postoperative complications, and patient satisfaction were statistically compared between the two groups.

Results: The recurrence rate was significantly lower in the contouring group than in the traditional group (2.0% vs. 18.0%, p < 0.001). Patients in the contouring group experienced significantly longer operative time (p < 0.001), while intraoperative blood loss did not differ significantly between groups. The overall complication rate was significantly lower in the contouring group (4.1% vs. 20.0%, p < 0.001), with a particularly reduced rate of incision-related infection in this group (1.0% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.044). Patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the contouring group (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The contouring-assisted resection approach was associated with a significantly lower recurrence rate and higher patient satisfaction compared with traditional fistula tract excision, without an increase in specific complications such as chondritis, hematoma requiring intervention, or persistent sensory abnormality. These observations suggest this method is an effective and safe surgical option for patients with CPF in the crus of the helix region.

螺旋软骨区足部轮廓辅助切除治疗先天性耳前瘘的疗效。
目的:比较螺旋软骨区足部轮廓辅助切除与传统瘘道切除治疗先天性耳前瘘(CPF)的疗效和安全性。方法:本回顾性队列研究招募了2018年1月至2024年6月在瑞金医院接受手术治疗的198例CPF患者。根据手术技术,将患者分为轮廓组(n = 98)和传统手术组(n = 100)。轮廓组在保留软骨框架的情况下,沿螺旋软骨小腿的前表面和深表面进行轮廓辅助切除,包括系统清扫。比较两组患者的基线特征、复发率、手术时间、术后并发症及患者满意度。结果:整形组复发率明显低于传统组(2.0% vs. 18.0%, p < 0.001)。轮廓组患者手术时间明显延长(p < 0.001),术中出血量组间差异无统计学意义。轮廓组的总并发症发生率明显低于对照组(4.1%比20.0%,p < 0.001),切口相关感染发生率明显低于对照组(1.0%比8.0%,p = 0.044)。等高线组患者满意度得分显著高于等高线组(p < 0.001)。结论:与传统的瘘管道切除术相比,轮廓辅助切除术的复发率明显降低,患者满意度更高,且没有增加特定并发症,如软骨炎、需要干预的血肿或持续感觉异常。这些观察结果表明,这种方法是一种有效和安全的手术选择,患者的CPF在小腿螺旋区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali Italiani di Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal and covers all aspects of surgery:elective, emergency and experimental surgery, as well as problems involving technology, teaching, organization and forensic medicine. The articles are published in Italian or English, though English is preferred because it facilitates the international diffusion of the journal (v.Guidelines for Authors and Norme per gli Autori). The articles published are divided into three main sections:editorials, original articles, and case reports and innovations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书