Application of Multimodal Pain Management Protocols Following Pediatric Liver Transplantation.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Jin-Feng Zhuo, Hui-Ying Zhong, Xian-Ling Zhang
{"title":"Application of Multimodal Pain Management Protocols Following Pediatric Liver Transplantation.","authors":"Jin-Feng Zhuo, Hui-Ying Zhong, Xian-Ling Zhang","doi":"10.62713/aic.4532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop and implement a pain management program aimed at improving pain control and promoting postoperative recovery following liver transplantation in pediatrics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a retrospective analysis of 95 children who underwent liver transplantation between May 2020 and May 2025. Patients were divided into observation and control groups according to the actual postoperative pain management plan they received. The observation group received a multimodal analgesia protocol incorporating both drug and non-drug interventions. Pain was assessed regularly, and corresponding interventions were implemented as needed. The control group received conventional analgesic management. Pain score, recovery time, and family satisfaction were the primary outcome measures. Independent-sample <i>t</i>-tests and chi-square tests were used for between-group comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pain scores in the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group during the T3-T7 stages (the afternoon of the first postoperative day, and T7 refers to the afternoon of post operative day 3) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Time to ambulation was significantly shorter in the observation group (<i>p</i> = 0.002), with shorter hospitalization duration (<i>p</i> = 0.004) than those in the control group. Pain-related stress indicators also improved significantly in the observation group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Additionally, significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding the distribution of satisfaction levels for nursing rounds (<i>p</i> = 0.030) and health education (<i>p</i> = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The postoperative pain management program for pediatric liver transplantation effectively alleviates postoperative pain through multimodal analgesia, shortens recovery time, and improves family satisfaction. This approach shows substantial clinical value and may serve as a reference for standardizing pain management in children post-liver transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8210,"journal":{"name":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","volume":"97 7","pages":"1162-1171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.4532","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To develop and implement a pain management program aimed at improving pain control and promoting postoperative recovery following liver transplantation in pediatrics.

Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of 95 children who underwent liver transplantation between May 2020 and May 2025. Patients were divided into observation and control groups according to the actual postoperative pain management plan they received. The observation group received a multimodal analgesia protocol incorporating both drug and non-drug interventions. Pain was assessed regularly, and corresponding interventions were implemented as needed. The control group received conventional analgesic management. Pain score, recovery time, and family satisfaction were the primary outcome measures. Independent-sample t-tests and chi-square tests were used for between-group comparisons.

Results: Pain scores in the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group during the T3-T7 stages (the afternoon of the first postoperative day, and T7 refers to the afternoon of post operative day 3) (p < 0.05). Time to ambulation was significantly shorter in the observation group (p = 0.002), with shorter hospitalization duration (p = 0.004) than those in the control group. Pain-related stress indicators also improved significantly in the observation group (p < 0.05). Additionally, significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding the distribution of satisfaction levels for nursing rounds (p = 0.030) and health education (p = 0.005).

Conclusions: The postoperative pain management program for pediatric liver transplantation effectively alleviates postoperative pain through multimodal analgesia, shortens recovery time, and improves family satisfaction. This approach shows substantial clinical value and may serve as a reference for standardizing pain management in children post-liver transplantation.

儿童肝移植后多模式疼痛管理方案的应用。
目的:制定和实施一套旨在改善儿科肝移植术后疼痛控制和促进术后恢复的疼痛管理方案。方法:本研究对2020年5月至2025年5月期间接受肝移植的95名儿童进行回顾性分析。根据患者实际接受的术后疼痛管理方案分为观察组和对照组。观察组采用药物和非药物干预的多模式镇痛方案。定期评估疼痛,并根据需要实施相应的干预措施。对照组给予常规镇痛处理。疼痛评分、恢复时间和家庭满意度是主要观察指标。组间比较采用独立样本t检验和卡方检验。结果:观察组患者t3 ~ T7期(术后第1天下午,T7期为术后第3天下午)疼痛评分显著低于对照组(p < 0.05)。观察组患儿下床时间明显短于对照组(p = 0.002),住院时间明显短于对照组(p = 0.004)。观察组患者疼痛相关应激指标也明显改善(p < 0.05)。此外,两组在护理查房满意度分布(p = 0.030)和健康教育满意度分布(p = 0.005)方面存在显著差异。结论:小儿肝移植术后疼痛管理方案通过多模式镇痛有效缓解术后疼痛,缩短恢复时间,提高家属满意度。该方法具有重要的临床价值,可作为规范儿童肝移植术后疼痛管理的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali Italiani di Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal and covers all aspects of surgery:elective, emergency and experimental surgery, as well as problems involving technology, teaching, organization and forensic medicine. The articles are published in Italian or English, though English is preferred because it facilitates the international diffusion of the journal (v.Guidelines for Authors and Norme per gli Autori). The articles published are divided into three main sections:editorials, original articles, and case reports and innovations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书