Standardized protocols for reflexing to a multigene panel for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: prevalence and perceived barriers to comprehensive, pathologist-ordered biomarker reflex testing.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Lynnette Savaloja Pineault, Nikki Martin, Melissa A Kelly, Robyn L Temple-Smolkin, Alexandra S Brown
{"title":"Standardized protocols for reflexing to a multigene panel for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: prevalence and perceived barriers to comprehensive, pathologist-ordered biomarker reflex testing.","authors":"Lynnette Savaloja Pineault, Nikki Martin, Melissa A Kelly, Robyn L Temple-Smolkin, Alexandra S Brown","doi":"10.1093/ajcp/aqag077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the use of standardized protocols for reflexing to broad, multigene panels in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and identify barriers that limit timely pathologist‑ordered biomarker reflex testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was administered to a national sample of health care professionals involved in NSCLC biomarker testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 111 respondents in the dataset, 77.5% reported using an institutional standardized protocol for comprehensive biomarker testing (CBT), and 88.4% of these protocols included reflexing to a multigene panel. Most respondents with reflex protocols indicated that 80% or more of newly diagnosed patients with NSCLC received CBT; however, fewer respondents reported that results were available before the oncology visit to select first‑line treatment. Pathologists were the primary ordering providers in institutions with standardized protocols. Respondents agreed that pathologist‑ordered reflex biomarker testing improves cancer care and supported Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) recognition of pathologists as ordering physicians for broad biomarker panels. Despite protocol adoption, respondents cited persistent barriers-including reimbursement, insurance authorization delays, and the Medicare 14-day rule.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Locally standardized protocols incorporating reflex multigene panel testing have been reported and are associated with high rates of CBT. Institutional and operational barriers delay the availability of results and limit the impact of these protocols on first‑line treatment decisions. Clarifying CMS guidance on pathologists as valid ordering physicians for broad biomarker panels, strengthening coordination with multidisciplinary teams, addressing workflow constraints, and educating the laboratories and payers on pathologists having ordering authority may enhance the effectiveness and adoption of reflex biomarker testing models.</p>","PeriodicalId":7506,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical pathology","volume":"166 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13378168/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqag077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the use of standardized protocols for reflexing to broad, multigene panels in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and identify barriers that limit timely pathologist‑ordered biomarker reflex testing.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was administered to a national sample of health care professionals involved in NSCLC biomarker testing.

Results: Of 111 respondents in the dataset, 77.5% reported using an institutional standardized protocol for comprehensive biomarker testing (CBT), and 88.4% of these protocols included reflexing to a multigene panel. Most respondents with reflex protocols indicated that 80% or more of newly diagnosed patients with NSCLC received CBT; however, fewer respondents reported that results were available before the oncology visit to select first‑line treatment. Pathologists were the primary ordering providers in institutions with standardized protocols. Respondents agreed that pathologist‑ordered reflex biomarker testing improves cancer care and supported Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) recognition of pathologists as ordering physicians for broad biomarker panels. Despite protocol adoption, respondents cited persistent barriers-including reimbursement, insurance authorization delays, and the Medicare 14-day rule.

Conclusions: Locally standardized protocols incorporating reflex multigene panel testing have been reported and are associated with high rates of CBT. Institutional and operational barriers delay the availability of results and limit the impact of these protocols on first‑line treatment decisions. Clarifying CMS guidance on pathologists as valid ordering physicians for broad biomarker panels, strengthening coordination with multidisciplinary teams, addressing workflow constraints, and educating the laboratories and payers on pathologists having ordering authority may enhance the effectiveness and adoption of reflex biomarker testing models.

非小细胞肺癌患者多基因反射的标准化方案:全面、病理有序的生物标志物反射检测的患病率和感知障碍
目的:评估在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中广泛、多基因面板反射的标准化方案的使用,并确定限制及时病理学家有序的生物标志物反射检测的障碍。方法:对参与NSCLC生物标志物检测的全国卫生保健专业人员进行横断面调查。结果:在数据集中的111名受访者中,77.5%的人报告使用了综合生物标志物测试(CBT)的机构标准化方案,其中88.4%的方案包括对多基因面板的反射。大多数采用反射治疗方案的应答者表明,80%或更多的新诊断的NSCLC患者接受CBT治疗;然而,较少的应答者报告在肿瘤学访问以选择一线治疗之前可获得结果。病理学家是采用标准化方案的机构的主要订餐提供者。受访者同意病理学家要求的反射生物标志物检测改善了癌症治疗,并支持医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)承认病理学家是广泛生物标志物面板的订购医生。尽管采用了协议,但受访者提到了持续存在的障碍,包括报销、保险授权延迟和医疗保险14天规则。结论:据报道,结合反射性多基因面板检测的局部标准化方案与高CBT率相关。体制和操作障碍延迟了结果的获得,并限制了这些方案对一线治疗决策的影响。明确CMS对病理学家作为广泛生物标志物小组的有效订货医生的指导,加强与多学科团队的协调,解决工作流程限制,并教育实验室和付款人病理学家具有订货权,可以提高反射性生物标志物检测模型的有效性和采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Clinical Pathology (AJCP) is the official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pathology and the Academy of Clinical Laboratory Physicians and Scientists. It is a leading international journal for publication of articles concerning novel anatomic pathology and laboratory medicine observations on human disease. AJCP emphasizes articles that focus on the application of evolving technologies for the diagnosis and characterization of diseases and conditions, as well as those that have a direct link toward improving patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书