From Single Foods to Whole Diets: A Critical Framework for Protein Quality Assessment Accounting for Complementarity and Matrix Effects.

IF 15.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Adi Nudel, Zohar Kerem
{"title":"From Single Foods to Whole Diets: A Critical Framework for Protein Quality Assessment Accounting for Complementarity and Matrix Effects.","authors":"Adi Nudel, Zohar Kerem","doi":"10.1111/1541-4337.70571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate protein quality assessment is fundamental to food science and nutrition policy, yet the two dominant metrics, the Protein Digestibility-Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS) and the Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS), evaluate foods in isolation, identifying a single limiting indispensable amino acid (AA) per source. Although PDCAAS and DIAAS are broadly applicable, their single-food approach is especially limiting for plant-based proteins, where AA complementarity and food-matrix complexity are most pronounced. This single-food approach systematically underestimates protein adequacy in real-world diets, where diverse protein sources are consumed together and their AA profiles complement across meals and days. Compounding this limitation, food matrix composition, thermal processing, and product formulation reduce AA bioaccessibility relative to ingredient-level scores, as shown, for example, by in vitro DIAAS analyses of protein bars and processing losses of reactive lysine in plant-based products, effects single-food metrics cannot capture. This critical review synthesizes experimental evidence that protein quality is both additive and accurately predictable at the meal and dietary level, and proposes a whole-diet protein quality (WDPQ) framework that pools digestible indispensable AA contributions across daily intake to identify limiting AAs at the dietary rather than the single-food level. Applied to Mediterranean, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), and pregnancy diets, as well as vulnerable populations, WDPQ yields corrected protein values 18%-30% higher than conventional single-food summation, materially altering assessments of dietary adequacy. The WDPQ framework is implementable using existing PDCAAS and DIAAS data and has implications for protein labeling, dietary guidelines, and the nutritional evaluation of plant-based food transitions.</p>","PeriodicalId":155,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","volume":"25 4","pages":"e70571"},"PeriodicalIF":15.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13377661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.70571","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate protein quality assessment is fundamental to food science and nutrition policy, yet the two dominant metrics, the Protein Digestibility-Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS) and the Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS), evaluate foods in isolation, identifying a single limiting indispensable amino acid (AA) per source. Although PDCAAS and DIAAS are broadly applicable, their single-food approach is especially limiting for plant-based proteins, where AA complementarity and food-matrix complexity are most pronounced. This single-food approach systematically underestimates protein adequacy in real-world diets, where diverse protein sources are consumed together and their AA profiles complement across meals and days. Compounding this limitation, food matrix composition, thermal processing, and product formulation reduce AA bioaccessibility relative to ingredient-level scores, as shown, for example, by in vitro DIAAS analyses of protein bars and processing losses of reactive lysine in plant-based products, effects single-food metrics cannot capture. This critical review synthesizes experimental evidence that protein quality is both additive and accurately predictable at the meal and dietary level, and proposes a whole-diet protein quality (WDPQ) framework that pools digestible indispensable AA contributions across daily intake to identify limiting AAs at the dietary rather than the single-food level. Applied to Mediterranean, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), and pregnancy diets, as well as vulnerable populations, WDPQ yields corrected protein values 18%-30% higher than conventional single-food summation, materially altering assessments of dietary adequacy. The WDPQ framework is implementable using existing PDCAAS and DIAAS data and has implications for protein labeling, dietary guidelines, and the nutritional evaluation of plant-based food transitions.

从单一食物到整体饮食:考虑互补性和基质效应的蛋白质质量评估关键框架。
准确的蛋白质质量评估是食品科学和营养政策的基础,但两个主要指标,蛋白质消化率校正氨基酸评分(PDCAAS)和可消化的必需氨基酸评分(DIAAS),单独评估食物,确定单个限制的必需氨基酸(AA)来源。尽管PDCAAS和DIAAS广泛适用,但它们的单一食物方法尤其限制了植物性蛋白质,其中AA互补性和食物基质复杂性最为明显。这种单一食物的方法系统性地低估了现实世界饮食中的蛋白质充足性,在现实世界中,多种蛋白质来源被一起摄入,它们的AA谱在每餐和每天中都是互补的。再加上这一限制,食品基质组成、热处理和产品配方相对于成分水平得分降低了AA的生物可及性,如所示,通过体外DIAAS分析蛋白质棒和植物性产品中活性赖氨酸的加工损失,单一食品指标无法捕捉到的影响。这篇重要的综述综合了实验证据,证明蛋白质质量在膳食和膳食水平上既是可添加的,也是可准确预测的,并提出了一个全膳食蛋白质质量(WDPQ)框架,该框架汇集了每日摄入中可消化的不可缺少的AA贡献,以确定饮食而不是单一食物水平的限制AA。应用于地中海饮食、预防高血压饮食方法(DASH)和妊娠饮食以及弱势人群,WDPQ产生的校正蛋白质值比传统的单一食物总和高18%-30%,从本质上改变了对饮食充足性的评估。WDPQ框架可使用现有的PDCAAS和DIAAS数据实施,对蛋白质标签、膳食指南和植物性食物转换的营养评估具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
26.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety (CRFSFS) is an online peer-reviewed journal established in 2002. It aims to provide scientists with unique and comprehensive reviews covering various aspects of food science and technology. CRFSFS publishes in-depth reviews addressing the chemical, microbiological, physical, sensory, and nutritional properties of foods, as well as food processing, engineering, analytical methods, and packaging. Manuscripts should contribute new insights and recommendations to the scientific knowledge on the topic. The journal prioritizes recent developments and encourages critical assessment of experimental design and interpretation of results. Topics related to food safety, such as preventive controls, ingredient contaminants, storage, food authenticity, and adulteration, are considered. Reviews on food hazards must demonstrate validity and reliability in real food systems, not just in model systems. Additionally, reviews on nutritional properties should provide a realistic perspective on how foods influence health, considering processing and storage effects on bioactivity. The journal also accepts reviews on consumer behavior, risk assessment, food regulations, and post-harvest physiology. Authors are encouraged to consult the Editor in Chief before submission to ensure topic suitability. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on analytical and sensory methods, quality control, and food safety approaches are welcomed, with authors advised to follow IFIS Good review practice guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书