{"title":"From Single Foods to Whole Diets: A Critical Framework for Protein Quality Assessment Accounting for Complementarity and Matrix Effects.","authors":"Adi Nudel, Zohar Kerem","doi":"10.1111/1541-4337.70571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate protein quality assessment is fundamental to food science and nutrition policy, yet the two dominant metrics, the Protein Digestibility-Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS) and the Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS), evaluate foods in isolation, identifying a single limiting indispensable amino acid (AA) per source. Although PDCAAS and DIAAS are broadly applicable, their single-food approach is especially limiting for plant-based proteins, where AA complementarity and food-matrix complexity are most pronounced. This single-food approach systematically underestimates protein adequacy in real-world diets, where diverse protein sources are consumed together and their AA profiles complement across meals and days. Compounding this limitation, food matrix composition, thermal processing, and product formulation reduce AA bioaccessibility relative to ingredient-level scores, as shown, for example, by in vitro DIAAS analyses of protein bars and processing losses of reactive lysine in plant-based products, effects single-food metrics cannot capture. This critical review synthesizes experimental evidence that protein quality is both additive and accurately predictable at the meal and dietary level, and proposes a whole-diet protein quality (WDPQ) framework that pools digestible indispensable AA contributions across daily intake to identify limiting AAs at the dietary rather than the single-food level. Applied to Mediterranean, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), and pregnancy diets, as well as vulnerable populations, WDPQ yields corrected protein values 18%-30% higher than conventional single-food summation, materially altering assessments of dietary adequacy. The WDPQ framework is implementable using existing PDCAAS and DIAAS data and has implications for protein labeling, dietary guidelines, and the nutritional evaluation of plant-based food transitions.</p>","PeriodicalId":155,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","volume":"25 4","pages":"e70571"},"PeriodicalIF":15.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13377661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.70571","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Accurate protein quality assessment is fundamental to food science and nutrition policy, yet the two dominant metrics, the Protein Digestibility-Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS) and the Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS), evaluate foods in isolation, identifying a single limiting indispensable amino acid (AA) per source. Although PDCAAS and DIAAS are broadly applicable, their single-food approach is especially limiting for plant-based proteins, where AA complementarity and food-matrix complexity are most pronounced. This single-food approach systematically underestimates protein adequacy in real-world diets, where diverse protein sources are consumed together and their AA profiles complement across meals and days. Compounding this limitation, food matrix composition, thermal processing, and product formulation reduce AA bioaccessibility relative to ingredient-level scores, as shown, for example, by in vitro DIAAS analyses of protein bars and processing losses of reactive lysine in plant-based products, effects single-food metrics cannot capture. This critical review synthesizes experimental evidence that protein quality is both additive and accurately predictable at the meal and dietary level, and proposes a whole-diet protein quality (WDPQ) framework that pools digestible indispensable AA contributions across daily intake to identify limiting AAs at the dietary rather than the single-food level. Applied to Mediterranean, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), and pregnancy diets, as well as vulnerable populations, WDPQ yields corrected protein values 18%-30% higher than conventional single-food summation, materially altering assessments of dietary adequacy. The WDPQ framework is implementable using existing PDCAAS and DIAAS data and has implications for protein labeling, dietary guidelines, and the nutritional evaluation of plant-based food transitions.
期刊介绍:
Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety (CRFSFS) is an online peer-reviewed journal established in 2002. It aims to provide scientists with unique and comprehensive reviews covering various aspects of food science and technology.
CRFSFS publishes in-depth reviews addressing the chemical, microbiological, physical, sensory, and nutritional properties of foods, as well as food processing, engineering, analytical methods, and packaging. Manuscripts should contribute new insights and recommendations to the scientific knowledge on the topic. The journal prioritizes recent developments and encourages critical assessment of experimental design and interpretation of results.
Topics related to food safety, such as preventive controls, ingredient contaminants, storage, food authenticity, and adulteration, are considered. Reviews on food hazards must demonstrate validity and reliability in real food systems, not just in model systems. Additionally, reviews on nutritional properties should provide a realistic perspective on how foods influence health, considering processing and storage effects on bioactivity.
The journal also accepts reviews on consumer behavior, risk assessment, food regulations, and post-harvest physiology. Authors are encouraged to consult the Editor in Chief before submission to ensure topic suitability. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on analytical and sensory methods, quality control, and food safety approaches are welcomed, with authors advised to follow IFIS Good review practice guidelines.