Kinetics of polymerization shrinkage and shrinkage stress in a self-cured resin composite.

IF 6.3 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Jing Fu, Abdulaziz Alayed, Qi Xue, Nikolaos Silikas, David C Watts
{"title":"Kinetics of polymerization shrinkage and shrinkage stress in a self-cured resin composite.","authors":"Jing Fu, Abdulaziz Alayed, Qi Xue, Nikolaos Silikas, David C Watts","doi":"10.1016/j.dental.2026.07.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterize the polymerization shrinkage strain, shrinkage stress, and Martens hardness kinetics of a self-cured bulk-fill resin composite (STELA Automix) under different bonding protocols, and to compare its behavior with two light-cured bulk-fill composites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>STELA Automix was evaluated either alone (ST<sub>A</sub>) or with its dedicated STELA Primer (ST<sub>A</sub>+P<sub>ST</sub>), Adhese Universal (ST<sub>A</sub>+AU), or Adhese Universal followed by light curing (STA+AU+LCU). Polymerization shrinkage strain (bonded-disk, 60 min, n = 3), shrinkage stress (Bioman II analyzer, 3600 s, n = 3), and Martens hardness (up to 7 days, n = 5) were measured for STELA and two light-cured bulk-fill composites, Filtek One Bulk Fill and SureFil SDR flow (SDR), under equivalent conditions (23 °C). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All STELA configurations showed higher final shrinkage strain than the light-cured bulk-fill materials (p < 0.05). Final shrinkage stresses ranged from 1.34 to 2.39 MPa, with ST<sub>A</sub> + AU yielding the lowest and ST<sub>A</sub> + AU + LCU the highest values (p < 0.05). The dedicated STELA Primer advanced shrinkage onset and increased the interval between onset and the maximum shrinkage-strain rate (Δt), indicating an altered early shrinkage-kinetic profile in the bonded configuration. Across the STELA protocols, shrinkage-rate development extended over tens of seconds, while Martens hardness increased gradually over 7 days and ultimately exceeded that of SDR.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Despite higher polymerization shrinkage strain than the light-cured composites, STELA exhibited slower stress build-up and a prolonged viscoelastic response during early polymerization. The dedicated primer altered the early shrinkage-kinetic profile by increasing Δt, whereas additional light activation compressed this interval. This kinetic profile, which can be modified by formulation and bonding protocol, may be as critical as shrinkage magnitude in shaping interfacial stress development in bulk-fill composites.</p>","PeriodicalId":298,"journal":{"name":"Dental Materials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2026.07.007","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To characterize the polymerization shrinkage strain, shrinkage stress, and Martens hardness kinetics of a self-cured bulk-fill resin composite (STELA Automix) under different bonding protocols, and to compare its behavior with two light-cured bulk-fill composites.

Methods: STELA Automix was evaluated either alone (STA) or with its dedicated STELA Primer (STA+PST), Adhese Universal (STA+AU), or Adhese Universal followed by light curing (STA+AU+LCU). Polymerization shrinkage strain (bonded-disk, 60 min, n = 3), shrinkage stress (Bioman II analyzer, 3600 s, n = 3), and Martens hardness (up to 7 days, n = 5) were measured for STELA and two light-cured bulk-fill composites, Filtek One Bulk Fill and SureFil SDR flow (SDR), under equivalent conditions (23 °C). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05).

Results: All STELA configurations showed higher final shrinkage strain than the light-cured bulk-fill materials (p < 0.05). Final shrinkage stresses ranged from 1.34 to 2.39 MPa, with STA + AU yielding the lowest and STA + AU + LCU the highest values (p < 0.05). The dedicated STELA Primer advanced shrinkage onset and increased the interval between onset and the maximum shrinkage-strain rate (Δt), indicating an altered early shrinkage-kinetic profile in the bonded configuration. Across the STELA protocols, shrinkage-rate development extended over tens of seconds, while Martens hardness increased gradually over 7 days and ultimately exceeded that of SDR.

Significance: Despite higher polymerization shrinkage strain than the light-cured composites, STELA exhibited slower stress build-up and a prolonged viscoelastic response during early polymerization. The dedicated primer altered the early shrinkage-kinetic profile by increasing Δt, whereas additional light activation compressed this interval. This kinetic profile, which can be modified by formulation and bonding protocol, may be as critical as shrinkage magnitude in shaping interfacial stress development in bulk-fill composites.

自固化树脂复合材料的聚合收缩和收缩应力动力学。
目的:研究一种自固化填充树脂复合材料(STELA Automix)在不同粘结方式下的聚合收缩应变、收缩应力和马氏硬度动力学,并将其与两种光固化填充树脂复合材料进行比较。方法:对STELA Automix单独(STA)或与专用的STELA底漆(STA+PST), Adhese Universal (STA+AU)或Adhese Universal随后光固化(STA+AU+LCU)进行评估。在等效条件(23°C)下,测量了STELA和两种光固化体填料复合材料Filtek One Bulk Fill和SureFil SDR flow (SDR)的聚合收缩应变(粘结盘,60 min, n = 3)、收缩应力(Bioman II分析仪,3600 s, n = 3)和马丁氏硬度(长达7天,n = 5)。资料采用单因素方差分析和Tukey检验(α = 0.05)。结果:所有的STELA构型均表现出比光固化填充材料更高的最终收缩应变(p A + AU最小,STA + AU + LCU最高)(p )意义:尽管比光固化复合材料更高的聚合收缩应变,但STELA在聚合早期表现出更慢的应力积累和更长的粘弹性响应。专用引物通过增加Δt改变了早期收缩动力学剖面,而额外的光激活压缩了这一间隔。这种动力学分布可以通过配方和粘接协议进行修改,在形成大块填充复合材料的界面应力发展方面,它可能与收缩幅度一样重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dental Materials
Dental Materials 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Dental Materials publishes original research, review articles, and short communications. Academy of Dental Materials members click here to register for free access to Dental Materials online. The principal aim of Dental Materials is to promote rapid communication of scientific information between academia, industry, and the dental practitioner. Original Manuscripts on clinical and laboratory research of basic and applied character which focus on the properties or performance of dental materials or the reaction of host tissues to materials are given priority publication. Other acceptable topics include application technology in clinical dentistry and dental laboratory technology. Comprehensive reviews and editorial commentaries on pertinent subjects will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书