Digital Health Interventions to Improve Medication Adherence Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Kaleab Taye Haile, Wejdan Shahin, Eyob Alemayehu Gebreyohannes, Abdella Birhan Yabeyu, Amina Hareem, Mulugeta Hayelom Kalayou, Xun Yi, Kate Wang
{"title":"Digital Health Interventions to Improve Medication Adherence Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review","authors":"Kaleab Taye Haile,&nbsp;Wejdan Shahin,&nbsp;Eyob Alemayehu Gebreyohannes,&nbsp;Abdella Birhan Yabeyu,&nbsp;Amina Hareem,&nbsp;Mulugeta Hayelom Kalayou,&nbsp;Xun Yi,&nbsp;Kate Wang","doi":"10.1111/ajag.70206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To review evidence on the type, characteristics and effect of digital health interventions (DHIs) on medication adherence among older people.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Articles were searched from inception to May 2025 in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science. Randomised and non-randomised studies were included if they: involved older people aged 65 years or older; applied any DHI(s); compared the intervention with a comparator group or baseline; and reported medication adherence as an outcome. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tools, and certainty of evidence using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation). A narrative synthesis was conducted.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 35 articles were included, most of which were randomised controlled trials (<i>n</i> = 22). Risk of bias ranged from low to high, and certainty from very low to moderate. Nearly half of the studies (<i>n</i> = 17) reported DHIs improved medication adherence compared with control or baseline. Mobile apps (3/5), electronic reminders (3/3), social assistive robots (1/1), telenursing (1/1) and combined DHIs (2/2) showed the most promise. Interventions that used multiple functionalities or strategies to support behaviour change (reminders or prompts) were most likely to improve adherence. The other DHIs had mixed results or no significant effects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>While findings across DHIs varied, interventions incorporating tailored reminders, multicomponent features and interactivity may have the potential to be more effective in improving medication adherence among older adults. Further research is needed to identify usage patterns and investigate the factors underlying differences in effectiveness.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55431,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","volume":"45 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajag.70206","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajag.70206","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To review evidence on the type, characteristics and effect of digital health interventions (DHIs) on medication adherence among older people.

Methods

Articles were searched from inception to May 2025 in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science. Randomised and non-randomised studies were included if they: involved older people aged 65 years or older; applied any DHI(s); compared the intervention with a comparator group or baseline; and reported medication adherence as an outcome. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tools, and certainty of evidence using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation). A narrative synthesis was conducted.

Results

A total of 35 articles were included, most of which were randomised controlled trials (n = 22). Risk of bias ranged from low to high, and certainty from very low to moderate. Nearly half of the studies (n = 17) reported DHIs improved medication adherence compared with control or baseline. Mobile apps (3/5), electronic reminders (3/3), social assistive robots (1/1), telenursing (1/1) and combined DHIs (2/2) showed the most promise. Interventions that used multiple functionalities or strategies to support behaviour change (reminders or prompts) were most likely to improve adherence. The other DHIs had mixed results or no significant effects.

Conclusions

While findings across DHIs varied, interventions incorporating tailored reminders, multicomponent features and interactivity may have the potential to be more effective in improving medication adherence among older adults. Further research is needed to identify usage patterns and investigate the factors underlying differences in effectiveness.

Abstract Image

提高老年人服药依从性的数字健康干预:一项系统综述
目的探讨数字健康干预(DHIs)的类型、特点及其对老年人药物依从性的影响。方法在PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、Scopus和Web of Science等数据库中检索自成立以来至2025年5月的文章。纳入随机和非随机研究的条件是:涉及65岁或以上的老年人;申请任何DHI;将干预与对照组或基线进行比较;并报告了药物依从性作为结果。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险,使用GRADE(分级推荐、评估、发展和评价)评估证据的确定性。进行了叙事综合。结果共纳入35篇文献,其中大部分为随机对照试验(n = 22)。偏倚风险从低到高,确定性从极低到中等。近一半的研究(n = 17)报告,与对照组或基线相比,DHIs改善了药物依从性。移动应用程序(3/5)、电子提醒(3/3)、社交辅助机器人(1/1)、远程护理(1/1)和联合DHIs(2/2)最有希望。使用多种功能或策略来支持行为改变(提醒或提示)的干预措施最有可能提高依从性。其他DHIs的结果好坏参半,或者没有显著的效果。结论:虽然DHIs的研究结果各不相同,但结合定制提醒、多组分特征和交互性的干预措施可能更有效地改善老年人的药物依从性。需要进一步的研究来确定使用模式并调查有效性差异的潜在因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Journal on Ageing
Australasian Journal on Ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal on Ageing is a peer reviewed journal, which publishes original work in any area of gerontology and geriatric medicine. It welcomes international submissions, particularly from authors in the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书