Catalytic Hydropyrolysis of Beetle Killed Trees for the Production of Transportation Biofuels

IF 4.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 AGRONOMY
Oluwanisola Makinde, Fernando Resende, Micheal Asama, Demian F. Gomez
{"title":"Catalytic Hydropyrolysis of Beetle Killed Trees for the Production of Transportation Biofuels","authors":"Oluwanisola Makinde,&nbsp;Fernando Resende,&nbsp;Micheal Asama,&nbsp;Demian F. Gomez","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We conducted catalytic hydropyrolysis of beetle-killed trees: Pine, Ash tree, and Redbay in a micro-pyrolyzer (Py/GC–MS) and investigated the performance of heterogeneous catalysts like HZSM-5, NiMo-HZSM-5, and NiRe-HZSM-5. We also investigated the effects of temperature, catalyst-to-biomass ratio, and hydrogen pressure on product yield. Our findings reveal that aromatic yields increase with temperature and catalyst-to-biomass ratio but decline at higher hydrogen pressures; additionally, higher catalyst acidity enhances both total hydrocarbon production and selectivity toward C7–C8 aromatics, with each feedstock exhibiting distinct optimal conditions. The type of metal doped on the HZSM-5 zeolite plays an important role in the process. Under the tested conditions (500°C, 21 bar, and catalyst-to-biomass ratio 10:1), Molybdenum (Mo) outperformed Rhenium (Re) for promoting alkane formation. The NiRe-HZSM-5 catalyst produced only a modest yield of alkanes (0.7 wt.%) compared to the higher yield (10.0 wt.%) observed with NiMo-HZSM-5. Overall, NiMo-HZSM-5 was the optimum catalyst for the production of alkanes. HZSM-5 is the optimum catalyst for the production of aromatic hydrocarbons. To optimize the operating parameters and enhance aromatic yield, we employed a response surface methodology (RSM). The analysis revealed that the maximum product yield of 35.0% is obtained at 570°C, 14 bar, and catalyst-to-biomass ratio of 14:1. The highest aromatic yield of 28.3% is obtained at 562°C, 14 bar, and catalyst-to-biomass ratio of 13:1. The highest alkane yield is 5.7%, obtained at 400°C, 14 bar, and catalyst-to-biomass ratio of 8.6:1.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"18 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70158","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70158","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We conducted catalytic hydropyrolysis of beetle-killed trees: Pine, Ash tree, and Redbay in a micro-pyrolyzer (Py/GC–MS) and investigated the performance of heterogeneous catalysts like HZSM-5, NiMo-HZSM-5, and NiRe-HZSM-5. We also investigated the effects of temperature, catalyst-to-biomass ratio, and hydrogen pressure on product yield. Our findings reveal that aromatic yields increase with temperature and catalyst-to-biomass ratio but decline at higher hydrogen pressures; additionally, higher catalyst acidity enhances both total hydrocarbon production and selectivity toward C7–C8 aromatics, with each feedstock exhibiting distinct optimal conditions. The type of metal doped on the HZSM-5 zeolite plays an important role in the process. Under the tested conditions (500°C, 21 bar, and catalyst-to-biomass ratio 10:1), Molybdenum (Mo) outperformed Rhenium (Re) for promoting alkane formation. The NiRe-HZSM-5 catalyst produced only a modest yield of alkanes (0.7 wt.%) compared to the higher yield (10.0 wt.%) observed with NiMo-HZSM-5. Overall, NiMo-HZSM-5 was the optimum catalyst for the production of alkanes. HZSM-5 is the optimum catalyst for the production of aromatic hydrocarbons. To optimize the operating parameters and enhance aromatic yield, we employed a response surface methodology (RSM). The analysis revealed that the maximum product yield of 35.0% is obtained at 570°C, 14 bar, and catalyst-to-biomass ratio of 14:1. The highest aromatic yield of 28.3% is obtained at 562°C, 14 bar, and catalyst-to-biomass ratio of 13:1. The highest alkane yield is 5.7%, obtained at 400°C, 14 bar, and catalyst-to-biomass ratio of 8.6:1.

Abstract Image

甲虫死树催化加氢热解生产交通用生物燃料
在微热解装置(Py/ GC-MS)中对被甲虫杀死的松树、白蜡树和红枣进行了催化加氢热解,考察了HZSM-5、NiMo-HZSM-5和nre -HZSM-5等多相催化剂的性能。我们还研究了温度、催化剂-生物质比和氢气压力对产物收率的影响。研究结果表明:温度升高,催化剂与生物质比增大,芳香烃产率增大,氢压力增大,芳香烃产率降低;此外,较高的催化剂酸度提高了总烃产量和对C7-C8芳烃的选择性,每种原料表现出不同的最佳条件。在HZSM-5分子筛上掺杂的金属种类在这一过程中起着重要的作用。在500℃,21 bar,催化剂与生物质比为10:1的条件下,钼(Mo)在促进烷烃生成方面优于铼(Re)。NiMo-HZSM-5催化剂的烷烃产率较低(0.7 wt.%),而NiMo-HZSM-5催化剂的产率较高(10.0 wt.%)。综上所述,NiMo-HZSM-5是合成烷烃的最佳催化剂。HZSM-5是合成芳烃的最佳催化剂。为了优化工艺参数,提高芳香收率,采用响应面法(RSM)。结果表明,在570℃、14 bar、催化剂与生物质比为14:1的条件下,产率可达35.0%。在562℃,14 bar,催化剂与生物质比为13:1的条件下,芳香收率最高,为28.3%。在400°C, 14 bar,催化剂-生物质比为8.6:1的条件下,烷烃收率最高,为5.7%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Change Biology Bioenergy
Global Change Biology Bioenergy AGRONOMY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used. Key areas covered by the journal: Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis). Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues. Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems. Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy. Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书