Growing the Forest Not the Trees: A Methodology to Identify Strategic, Regional Opportunities for Sustainable Biodiversity Offsets

IF 1.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Linda Jane Abdo, Renee Young
{"title":"Growing the Forest Not the Trees: A Methodology to Identify Strategic, Regional Opportunities for Sustainable Biodiversity Offsets","authors":"Linda Jane Abdo,&nbsp;Renee Young","doi":"10.1111/emr.70057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Globally, natural values are under threat from increasing development to fulfil the needs of a growing population. Biodiversity loss and its link to ecosystem functions and services is of particular concern. Biodiversity offsets may be one solution to compensate for these impacts of development. In particular, the strategic use of offsets at a regional scale and the prioritisation of ecological linkages, collaborative and coordinated approaches can optimise benefits for natural values such as biodiversity and ecological features, functions and services. This research developed a methodology for strategic offset opportunities utilising a literature review, stakeholder engagement and spatial data and risk analyses to identify key priorities and solutions that could be delivered through offsets at a regional scale for the Northern Jarrah Forest (NJF) of Western Australia. The literature review identified climate change, vegetation clearing, altered fire regimes, disease and invasive species, and knowledge gaps as key priorities for the NJF that were confirmed during stakeholder engagement. Spatial analysis identified restoration as having the largest area of opportunity for offsets, while protection opportunities had the least and were limited by competing land uses. The risk assessment was undertaken to identify the risk of offset failure or non-delivery of expected biodiversity outcomes due to factors such as competing land uses, lack of permanence, data uncertainty and regulator/stakeholder acceptability. The risk analysis enabled comparison and prioritisation of offset solutions and identified activities to reduce risks associated with offsets. Restoration had the lowest overall risk (higher confidence and acceptability) while thinning and disease management carried higher uncertainty due to data limitations. The strategic use of offsets, particularly within a Maximum Sustainable Development approach, can reduce risk and optimise benefits to environmental, cultural, social and economic priorities. This is of particular importance in areas of high significance with competing priorities. Benefits from the strategic use of offsets can be further improved by application across multiple regions to ensure that the differing scales of cultural, social and economic priorities can be accounted for, allowing further flexibility in the use of offsets across greater scales.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54325,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Management & Restoration","volume":"27 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Management & Restoration","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emr.70057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globally, natural values are under threat from increasing development to fulfil the needs of a growing population. Biodiversity loss and its link to ecosystem functions and services is of particular concern. Biodiversity offsets may be one solution to compensate for these impacts of development. In particular, the strategic use of offsets at a regional scale and the prioritisation of ecological linkages, collaborative and coordinated approaches can optimise benefits for natural values such as biodiversity and ecological features, functions and services. This research developed a methodology for strategic offset opportunities utilising a literature review, stakeholder engagement and spatial data and risk analyses to identify key priorities and solutions that could be delivered through offsets at a regional scale for the Northern Jarrah Forest (NJF) of Western Australia. The literature review identified climate change, vegetation clearing, altered fire regimes, disease and invasive species, and knowledge gaps as key priorities for the NJF that were confirmed during stakeholder engagement. Spatial analysis identified restoration as having the largest area of opportunity for offsets, while protection opportunities had the least and were limited by competing land uses. The risk assessment was undertaken to identify the risk of offset failure or non-delivery of expected biodiversity outcomes due to factors such as competing land uses, lack of permanence, data uncertainty and regulator/stakeholder acceptability. The risk analysis enabled comparison and prioritisation of offset solutions and identified activities to reduce risks associated with offsets. Restoration had the lowest overall risk (higher confidence and acceptability) while thinning and disease management carried higher uncertainty due to data limitations. The strategic use of offsets, particularly within a Maximum Sustainable Development approach, can reduce risk and optimise benefits to environmental, cultural, social and economic priorities. This is of particular importance in areas of high significance with competing priorities. Benefits from the strategic use of offsets can be further improved by application across multiple regions to ensure that the differing scales of cultural, social and economic priorities can be accounted for, allowing further flexibility in the use of offsets across greater scales.

种植森林,而不是树木:确定可持续生物多样性抵消的战略性区域机会的方法
在全球范围内,为满足不断增长的人口的需要而进行的不断发展正威胁着自然价值。生物多样性丧失及其与生态系统功能和服务的联系尤其令人关切。生物多样性补偿可能是补偿这些发展影响的一种解决方案。特别是,在区域范围内战略性地利用抵消,优先考虑生态联系、协作和协调的方法,可以优化生物多样性和生态特征、功能和服务等自然价值的效益。本研究开发了一种战略抵消机会的方法,利用文献综述、利益相关者参与、空间数据和风险分析来确定关键优先事项和解决方案,这些优先事项和解决方案可以通过西澳大利亚州北亚拉赫森林(NJF)的区域范围内的抵消来实现。文献综述确定了气候变化、植被清除、改变的火灾制度、疾病和入侵物种以及知识差距是NJF在利益相关者参与期间确认的关键优先事项。空间分析表明,恢复具有最大的抵消机会,而保护机会最少,并受到竞争土地用途的限制。进行风险评估是为了确定由于土地使用竞争、缺乏持久性、数据不确定性和监管机构/利益相关者可接受性等因素导致抵消失败或无法实现预期生物多样性结果的风险。风险分析有助于对抵消解决方案进行比较和确定优先次序,并确定减少与抵消相关风险的活动。修复具有最低的总体风险(更高的置信度和可接受性),而由于数据限制,削薄和疾病管理具有更高的不确定性。战略性地使用抵消,特别是在最大限度的可持续发展方法中,可以减少风险并优化环境、文化、社会和经济优先事项的效益。这在具有相互竞争的优先事项的高度重要领域尤其重要。通过在多个地区的应用,可以进一步提高抵消战略使用的效益,以确保能够考虑到文化、社会和经济优先事项的不同规模,从而进一步灵活地在更大范围内使用抵消。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Management & Restoration
Ecological Management & Restoration Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Ecological Management & Restoration is a peer-reviewed journal with the dual aims of (i) reporting the latest science to assist ecologically appropriate management and restoration actions and (ii) providing a forum for reporting on these actions. Guided by an editorial board made up of researchers and practitioners, EMR seeks features, topical opinion pieces, research reports, short notes and project summaries applicable to Australasian ecosystems to encourage more regionally-appropriate management. Where relevant, contributions should draw on international science and practice and highlight any relevance to the global challenge of integrating biodiversity conservation in a rapidly changing world. Topic areas: Improved management and restoration of plant communities, fauna and habitat; coastal, marine and riparian zones; restoration ethics and philosophy; planning; monitoring and assessment; policy and legislation; landscape pattern and design; integrated ecosystems management; socio-economic issues and solutions; techniques and methodology; threatened species; genetic issues; indigenous land management; weeds and feral animal control; landscape arts and aesthetics; education and communication; community involvement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书