Assessing the Relative Roles of Soil Water Potential and Atmospheric Demand on Vegetation Water Stress in Semi-arid Ecosystems

IF 3.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Kayla Jamerson, Zachary H. Hoylman, Anna Sala, Ashley Ballantyne, Colin Brust, Kelsey G. Jencso
{"title":"Assessing the Relative Roles of Soil Water Potential and Atmospheric Demand on Vegetation Water Stress in Semi-arid Ecosystems","authors":"Kayla Jamerson,&nbsp;Zachary H. Hoylman,&nbsp;Anna Sala,&nbsp;Ashley Ballantyne,&nbsp;Colin Brust,&nbsp;Kelsey G. Jencso","doi":"10.1029/2025JG009009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding vegetation's response to soil water availability and atmospheric demand is critical for assessing the impact of drought and climate change on semi-arid ecosystems. However, limited field-based research has been conducted to assess the relative importance of these drivers on vegetation productivity. Furthermore, previous research often simplifies the assessment of soil water availability by relying on soil volumetric water content (VWC) as the primary control on plant growth. Unlike soil water potential (Ψ<sub>soil</sub>), VWC does not account for the effects of soil texture on plant water uptake. To address these gaps, we compared remotely sensed indicators of vegetation response with field-based measurements of VWC, relative humidity, and temperature (used to calculate vapor pressure deficit (VPD)) and soil temperature from 52 rangeland sites in Montana. Soil samples were collected at each site to generate a continuous time series of soil water potentials. We utilized generalized additive models to assess the relationship between our biophysical metrics and satellite-derived estimates of vegetation productivity, including the Enhanced Vegetation Index, near-infrared reflectance vegetation index (NIRv), and solar-induced fluorescence. Results suggest that Ψ<sub>soil</sub> is a better biophysical predictor of seasonal vegetation productivity, while VPD emerges as a secondary driver in the absence of Ψ<sub>soil</sub> limitations. Finally, anomalies in Ψ<sub>soil</sub> were the dominant driver of anomalies in seasonal vegetation response. These findings indicate that soil water potential is a primary control on vegetation water stress across semi-arid landscapes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16003,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences","volume":"131 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025JG009009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JG009009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding vegetation's response to soil water availability and atmospheric demand is critical for assessing the impact of drought and climate change on semi-arid ecosystems. However, limited field-based research has been conducted to assess the relative importance of these drivers on vegetation productivity. Furthermore, previous research often simplifies the assessment of soil water availability by relying on soil volumetric water content (VWC) as the primary control on plant growth. Unlike soil water potential (Ψsoil), VWC does not account for the effects of soil texture on plant water uptake. To address these gaps, we compared remotely sensed indicators of vegetation response with field-based measurements of VWC, relative humidity, and temperature (used to calculate vapor pressure deficit (VPD)) and soil temperature from 52 rangeland sites in Montana. Soil samples were collected at each site to generate a continuous time series of soil water potentials. We utilized generalized additive models to assess the relationship between our biophysical metrics and satellite-derived estimates of vegetation productivity, including the Enhanced Vegetation Index, near-infrared reflectance vegetation index (NIRv), and solar-induced fluorescence. Results suggest that Ψsoil is a better biophysical predictor of seasonal vegetation productivity, while VPD emerges as a secondary driver in the absence of Ψsoil limitations. Finally, anomalies in Ψsoil were the dominant driver of anomalies in seasonal vegetation response. These findings indicate that soil water potential is a primary control on vegetation water stress across semi-arid landscapes.

Abstract Image

半干旱生态系统土壤水势和大气需要量对植被水分胁迫的相对作用
了解植被对土壤水分有效性和大气需求的响应对于评估干旱和气候变化对半干旱生态系统的影响至关重要。然而,已经进行了有限的实地研究,以评估这些驱动因素对植被生产力的相对重要性。此外,以往的研究往往将土壤含水量作为植物生长的主要控制因素,从而简化了土壤水分有效性的评估。与土壤水势(Ψsoil)不同,VWC不考虑土壤质地对植物水分吸收的影响。为了解决这些差距,我们将蒙大拿州52个牧场的植被响应遥感指标与实地测量的VWC、相对湿度、温度(用于计算蒸汽压差(VPD))和土壤温度进行了比较。在每个站点采集土壤样品,生成土壤水势的连续时间序列。我们利用广义加性模型来评估我们的生物物理指标与卫星获得的植被生产力估算之间的关系,包括增强植被指数、近红外反射植被指数(NIRv)和太阳诱导荧光。结果表明,Ψsoil是季节性植被生产力的更好的生物物理预测因子,而VPD在没有Ψsoil限制的情况下成为次要驱动因子。最后,Ψsoil异常是季节植被响应异常的主要驱动因素。这些结果表明,土壤水势是半干旱景观中植被水分胁迫的主要控制因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences Earth and Planetary Sciences-Paleontology
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.40%
发文量
242
期刊介绍: JGR-Biogeosciences focuses on biogeosciences of the Earth system in the past, present, and future and the extension of this research to planetary studies. The emerging field of biogeosciences spans the intellectual interface between biology and the geosciences and attempts to understand the functions of the Earth system across multiple spatial and temporal scales. Studies in biogeosciences may use multiple lines of evidence drawn from diverse fields to gain a holistic understanding of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems and extreme environments. Specific topics within the scope of the section include process-based theoretical, experimental, and field studies of biogeochemistry, biogeophysics, atmosphere-, land-, and ocean-ecosystem interactions, biomineralization, life in extreme environments, astrobiology, microbial processes, geomicrobiology, and evolutionary geobiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书