Kayla Jamerson, Zachary H. Hoylman, Anna Sala, Ashley Ballantyne, Colin Brust, Kelsey G. Jencso
{"title":"Assessing the Relative Roles of Soil Water Potential and Atmospheric Demand on Vegetation Water Stress in Semi-arid Ecosystems","authors":"Kayla Jamerson, Zachary H. Hoylman, Anna Sala, Ashley Ballantyne, Colin Brust, Kelsey G. Jencso","doi":"10.1029/2025JG009009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding vegetation's response to soil water availability and atmospheric demand is critical for assessing the impact of drought and climate change on semi-arid ecosystems. However, limited field-based research has been conducted to assess the relative importance of these drivers on vegetation productivity. Furthermore, previous research often simplifies the assessment of soil water availability by relying on soil volumetric water content (VWC) as the primary control on plant growth. Unlike soil water potential (Ψ<sub>soil</sub>), VWC does not account for the effects of soil texture on plant water uptake. To address these gaps, we compared remotely sensed indicators of vegetation response with field-based measurements of VWC, relative humidity, and temperature (used to calculate vapor pressure deficit (VPD)) and soil temperature from 52 rangeland sites in Montana. Soil samples were collected at each site to generate a continuous time series of soil water potentials. We utilized generalized additive models to assess the relationship between our biophysical metrics and satellite-derived estimates of vegetation productivity, including the Enhanced Vegetation Index, near-infrared reflectance vegetation index (NIRv), and solar-induced fluorescence. Results suggest that Ψ<sub>soil</sub> is a better biophysical predictor of seasonal vegetation productivity, while VPD emerges as a secondary driver in the absence of Ψ<sub>soil</sub> limitations. Finally, anomalies in Ψ<sub>soil</sub> were the dominant driver of anomalies in seasonal vegetation response. These findings indicate that soil water potential is a primary control on vegetation water stress across semi-arid landscapes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16003,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences","volume":"131 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025JG009009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JG009009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding vegetation's response to soil water availability and atmospheric demand is critical for assessing the impact of drought and climate change on semi-arid ecosystems. However, limited field-based research has been conducted to assess the relative importance of these drivers on vegetation productivity. Furthermore, previous research often simplifies the assessment of soil water availability by relying on soil volumetric water content (VWC) as the primary control on plant growth. Unlike soil water potential (Ψsoil), VWC does not account for the effects of soil texture on plant water uptake. To address these gaps, we compared remotely sensed indicators of vegetation response with field-based measurements of VWC, relative humidity, and temperature (used to calculate vapor pressure deficit (VPD)) and soil temperature from 52 rangeland sites in Montana. Soil samples were collected at each site to generate a continuous time series of soil water potentials. We utilized generalized additive models to assess the relationship between our biophysical metrics and satellite-derived estimates of vegetation productivity, including the Enhanced Vegetation Index, near-infrared reflectance vegetation index (NIRv), and solar-induced fluorescence. Results suggest that Ψsoil is a better biophysical predictor of seasonal vegetation productivity, while VPD emerges as a secondary driver in the absence of Ψsoil limitations. Finally, anomalies in Ψsoil were the dominant driver of anomalies in seasonal vegetation response. These findings indicate that soil water potential is a primary control on vegetation water stress across semi-arid landscapes.
期刊介绍:
JGR-Biogeosciences focuses on biogeosciences of the Earth system in the past, present, and future and the extension of this research to planetary studies. The emerging field of biogeosciences spans the intellectual interface between biology and the geosciences and attempts to understand the functions of the Earth system across multiple spatial and temporal scales. Studies in biogeosciences may use multiple lines of evidence drawn from diverse fields to gain a holistic understanding of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems and extreme environments. Specific topics within the scope of the section include process-based theoretical, experimental, and field studies of biogeochemistry, biogeophysics, atmosphere-, land-, and ocean-ecosystem interactions, biomineralization, life in extreme environments, astrobiology, microbial processes, geomicrobiology, and evolutionary geobiology