Francisco Palmero, Ignacio A. Ciampitti, Trevor J. Hefley
{"title":"Bootstrap multimodel aggregation for estimating optimum nitrogen rates in agricultural crops","authors":"Francisco Palmero, Ignacio A. Ciampitti, Trevor J. Hefley","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>For several (non-legume) crops, nitrogen (N) fertilization is key to maximize grain yield and farmers’ profit. The N rate that balances production and income is the economic optimum nitrogen rate (EONR). Estimating the EONR is a model-based process, and results vary depending on the data and selected model. Therefore, multimodel inference can improve both accuracy (bias) and precision (variance) of EONR estimation. In this study, we propose for the first time the use of bootstrap-based multimodel aggregation (BbMA), a simple machine learning algorithm, as a multimodel inference technique to estimate optimal N rates. The objectives were to: (i) evaluate the ability of BbMA to estimate the true EONR under different data generating models and experimental designs using simulated data, and (ii) apply this approach to field data. Simulation results showed that BbMA reduced both bias and variance of EONR estimates compared to individual models, even when the true model was included among candidates. These improvements were more pronounced with higher data quality (i.e., more observations and N rates). In the field data example, BbMA estimates fell within the range of individual model estimates and produced wider confidence intervals. This BbMA framework for grain yield response to N fertilization provides a simple and robust method to estimate EONR (or other derived quantities) while accounting for model uncertainty.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"118 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70476","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
For several (non-legume) crops, nitrogen (N) fertilization is key to maximize grain yield and farmers’ profit. The N rate that balances production and income is the economic optimum nitrogen rate (EONR). Estimating the EONR is a model-based process, and results vary depending on the data and selected model. Therefore, multimodel inference can improve both accuracy (bias) and precision (variance) of EONR estimation. In this study, we propose for the first time the use of bootstrap-based multimodel aggregation (BbMA), a simple machine learning algorithm, as a multimodel inference technique to estimate optimal N rates. The objectives were to: (i) evaluate the ability of BbMA to estimate the true EONR under different data generating models and experimental designs using simulated data, and (ii) apply this approach to field data. Simulation results showed that BbMA reduced both bias and variance of EONR estimates compared to individual models, even when the true model was included among candidates. These improvements were more pronounced with higher data quality (i.e., more observations and N rates). In the field data example, BbMA estimates fell within the range of individual model estimates and produced wider confidence intervals. This BbMA framework for grain yield response to N fertilization provides a simple and robust method to estimate EONR (or other derived quantities) while accounting for model uncertainty.
期刊介绍:
After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture.
Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.