Physics-Informed Artificial Intelligence for Battery Degradation, Aging, and Lifetime Prediction

IF 11.1
Battery Energy Pub Date : 2026-07-09 DOI:10.1002/bte2.70136
Mohamad Fani Sulaima, Sunny Arora, Robert Frischer, Hamidreza Namazi
{"title":"Physics-Informed Artificial Intelligence for Battery Degradation, Aging, and Lifetime Prediction","authors":"Mohamad Fani Sulaima,&nbsp;Sunny Arora,&nbsp;Robert Frischer,&nbsp;Hamidreza Namazi","doi":"10.1002/bte2.70136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate prediction of battery degradation, aging trajectories, and lifetime is critical for electrochemical energy storage systems, with direct implications for safety, reliability, and lifecycle cost. Although artificial intelligence (AI)–based approaches have shown strong short-term performance in state-of-health and remaining useful life estimation, many remain data-driven and show limited robustness under long-term cycling, operating-regime shifts, and extrapolation beyond training data. Physics-based degradation models provide mechanistic insight, but face challenges related to computational cost, parameter uncertainty, and scalability. This review positions physics-informed artificial intelligence (PIAI) as an integrative modeling paradigm that can improve data efficiency, physical consistency, uncertainty awareness, and decision reliability when appropriately constrained and validated. Unlike reviews that examine AI algorithms, degradation mechanisms, hybrid models, digital twins, or uncertainty-aware prognostics separately, this work provides a unified multiscale synthesis linking degradation physics, PIAI model construction, uncertainty quantification, structured validation, and BMS/digital-twin deployment. We examine how physical laws, degradation constraints, and uncertainty representations are embedded into learning architectures and analyze failure modes of black-box and poorly constrained hybrid models. The review proposes a five-layer framework for trustworthy battery lifetime prediction and identifies directions for physically credible, uncertainty-aware, and deployment-ready battery intelligence.</p>","PeriodicalId":8807,"journal":{"name":"Battery Energy","volume":"5 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bte2.70136","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Battery Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bte2.70136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate prediction of battery degradation, aging trajectories, and lifetime is critical for electrochemical energy storage systems, with direct implications for safety, reliability, and lifecycle cost. Although artificial intelligence (AI)–based approaches have shown strong short-term performance in state-of-health and remaining useful life estimation, many remain data-driven and show limited robustness under long-term cycling, operating-regime shifts, and extrapolation beyond training data. Physics-based degradation models provide mechanistic insight, but face challenges related to computational cost, parameter uncertainty, and scalability. This review positions physics-informed artificial intelligence (PIAI) as an integrative modeling paradigm that can improve data efficiency, physical consistency, uncertainty awareness, and decision reliability when appropriately constrained and validated. Unlike reviews that examine AI algorithms, degradation mechanisms, hybrid models, digital twins, or uncertainty-aware prognostics separately, this work provides a unified multiscale synthesis linking degradation physics, PIAI model construction, uncertainty quantification, structured validation, and BMS/digital-twin deployment. We examine how physical laws, degradation constraints, and uncertainty representations are embedded into learning architectures and analyze failure modes of black-box and poorly constrained hybrid models. The review proposes a five-layer framework for trustworthy battery lifetime prediction and identifies directions for physically credible, uncertainty-aware, and deployment-ready battery intelligence.

Abstract Image

基于物理的电池退化、老化和寿命预测人工智能
准确预测电池退化、老化轨迹和寿命对于电化学储能系统至关重要,直接影响到安全性、可靠性和生命周期成本。尽管基于人工智能(AI)的方法在健康状态和剩余使用寿命估计方面显示出强大的短期性能,但许多方法仍然是数据驱动的,并且在长期循环、操作制度变化和训练数据之外的外推下显示出有限的鲁棒性。基于物理的降解模型提供了机制的洞察,但面临着与计算成本、参数不确定性和可扩展性相关的挑战。这篇综述将物理信息人工智能(PIAI)定位为一种集成的建模范式,在适当的约束和验证下,它可以提高数据效率、物理一致性、不确定性意识和决策可靠性。与单独研究人工智能算法、退化机制、混合模型、数字孪生或不确定性感知预测的综述不同,这项工作提供了统一的多尺度综合,将退化物理、PIAI模型构建、不确定性量化、结构化验证和BMS/数字孪生部署联系起来。我们研究了物理定律、退化约束和不确定性表征如何嵌入到学习架构中,并分析了黑盒和低约束混合模型的失效模式。该综述提出了一个可靠的电池寿命预测的五层框架,并确定了物理可信、不确定性感知和部署就绪电池智能的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书