The adaptive nature of Neanderthal discoidal technology: raw material constraints and technological variation during the late Mousterian of southwestern France
{"title":"The adaptive nature of Neanderthal discoidal technology: raw material constraints and technological variation during the late Mousterian of southwestern France","authors":"Peiqi Zhang, Brad Gravina","doi":"10.1007/s12520-026-02529-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding how Neanderthals adapted lithic technologies to varying environmental and raw-material conditions is fundamental to exploring their behavioural variability over time and space. Here we investigate this question via a quantitative techno-typological comparison of two late Middle Paleolithic discoidal assemblages from southwestern France – Le Moustier and Pech de l’Azé IV. Our results show that Neanderthal groups at both sites employed a highly similar <i>chaîne opératoire</i> typical of Discoid-Denticulate Mousterian assemblages, despite contrasting raw material quality and nodule size, as well as pronounced environmental instability during Marine Isotope Stage 3. Neanderthal technological responses to varying raw material conditions primarily involved adjustments in reduction intensity rather than shifts in flake production methods. The Pech-de-l’Azé IV assemblage shows more intensive core reduction and higher recycling associated with the exploitation of small, lower-quality nodules, whereas the Le Moustier assemblage reflects less intensive reduction of larger, better-quality flint nodules. Our findings highlight the flexibility of the discoidal system to varying raw material constraints while producing the consistent products with identical morphologies. The behavioural plasticity of late Neanderthal groups in southwestern France during Marine Isotope Stage 3 is reflected in the capacity to assess the physical properties and exploit raw materials of varying quality and size in differing resource settings while maintaining a stable technological tradition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8214,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","volume":"18 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-026-02529-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding how Neanderthals adapted lithic technologies to varying environmental and raw-material conditions is fundamental to exploring their behavioural variability over time and space. Here we investigate this question via a quantitative techno-typological comparison of two late Middle Paleolithic discoidal assemblages from southwestern France – Le Moustier and Pech de l’Azé IV. Our results show that Neanderthal groups at both sites employed a highly similar chaîne opératoire typical of Discoid-Denticulate Mousterian assemblages, despite contrasting raw material quality and nodule size, as well as pronounced environmental instability during Marine Isotope Stage 3. Neanderthal technological responses to varying raw material conditions primarily involved adjustments in reduction intensity rather than shifts in flake production methods. The Pech-de-l’Azé IV assemblage shows more intensive core reduction and higher recycling associated with the exploitation of small, lower-quality nodules, whereas the Le Moustier assemblage reflects less intensive reduction of larger, better-quality flint nodules. Our findings highlight the flexibility of the discoidal system to varying raw material constraints while producing the consistent products with identical morphologies. The behavioural plasticity of late Neanderthal groups in southwestern France during Marine Isotope Stage 3 is reflected in the capacity to assess the physical properties and exploit raw materials of varying quality and size in differing resource settings while maintaining a stable technological tradition.
了解尼安德特人如何使石器技术适应不同的环境和原材料条件,是探索他们随时间和空间变化的行为变化的基础。在这里,我们通过对来自法国西南部的两个中石器时代晚期盘状组合(Le Moustier和Pech de l ' az IV)的定量技术类型比较来研究这个问题。我们的结果表明,尽管原料质量和结节大小存在差异,并且在海洋同位素阶段3期间环境明显不稳定,但这两个地点的尼安德特人群体都采用了高度相似的盘状齿状莫斯特组合的典型cha ne opacimatoire。尼安德特人对不同原料条件的技术反应主要涉及还原强度的调整,而不是薄片生产方法的变化。Pech-de-l ' az IV组合显示出更强烈的岩心还原和更高的再循环,与开采小的、低质量的结核有关,而Le Moustier组合则反映出更大的、高质量的燧石结核较少的还原。我们的研究结果强调了盘状系统对不同原料限制的灵活性,同时生产具有相同形态的一致产品。在海洋同位素阶段3期间,法国西南部晚期尼安德特人群体的行为可塑性反映在评估物理性质和在不同资源环境中开采不同质量和大小的原材料的能力上,同时保持了稳定的技术传统。
期刊介绍:
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences covers the full spectrum of natural scientific methods with an emphasis on the archaeological contexts and the questions being studied. It bridges the gap between archaeologists and natural scientists providing a forum to encourage the continued integration of scientific methodologies in archaeological research.
Coverage in the journal includes: archaeology, geology/geophysical prospection, geoarchaeology, geochronology, palaeoanthropology, archaeozoology and archaeobotany, genetics and other biomolecules, material analysis and conservation science.
The journal is endorsed by the German Society of Natural Scientific Archaeology and Archaeometry (GNAA), the Hellenic Society for Archaeometry (HSC), the Association of Italian Archaeometrists (AIAr) and the Society of Archaeological Sciences (SAS).