Nanoparticle-Assisted Polymer Flooding for Enhanced Oil Recovery: Condition-Specific Mechanisms, Modeling Reliability, and Field-Scale Translation

IF 2 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
R. Venkatesh, Kuwar Mausam, M. Brahmaraju, Komal Parashar, Subrahmanya Ranjit Pasupuleti, Madhur Grover, Sagayaraj Pappu, Ramya Maranan, Madaminov Sanjarbek Maxmudjon Ugli, Rajkumar Sivanraju
{"title":"Nanoparticle-Assisted Polymer Flooding for Enhanced Oil Recovery: Condition-Specific Mechanisms, Modeling Reliability, and Field-Scale Translation","authors":"R. Venkatesh,&nbsp;Kuwar Mausam,&nbsp;M. Brahmaraju,&nbsp;Komal Parashar,&nbsp;Subrahmanya Ranjit Pasupuleti,&nbsp;Madhur Grover,&nbsp;Sagayaraj Pappu,&nbsp;Ramya Maranan,&nbsp;Madaminov Sanjarbek Maxmudjon Ugli,&nbsp;Rajkumar Sivanraju","doi":"10.1002/eng2.70917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nanoparticle-assisted polymer flooding (NAPF) is increasingly investigated as a hybrid chemical enhanced oil recovery (EOR) strategy because nanoparticles (NPs) can modify polymer rheology, adsorption, interfacial behavior, and flow diversion under selected reservoir conditions. However, reported performance varies substantially with rock mineralogy, permeability, brine salinity, temperature, crude-oil composition, polymer type, nanoparticle chemistry, particle size, concentration, injection sequence, and slug volume. This review critically evaluates NAPF by separating experimentally verified mechanisms from condition-dependent or still-emerging claims. Evidence from rheology, adsorption tests, contact-angle measurements, interfacial-tension analysis, micromodel visualization, and core flooding is synthesized to show when NPs improve polymer flooding and when they may cause aggregation, retention, injectivity loss, or formation damage. The review also distinguishes validated reservoir-simulation approaches from semi-validated pore-scale and molecular models and speculative artificial intelligence (AI)/digital-twin frameworks. Field and pilot-scale reports are compared using standardized descriptors, including reservoir type, permeability, temperature, salinity, nanomaterial concentration, polymer dosage, slug design, injectivity response, water-cut trend, and incremental recovery. Finally, a structured research roadmap is proposed for formulation screening, model validation, field monitoring, techno-economic assessment, and environmental-risk evaluation. The review emphasizes that NAPF should be interpreted as a reservoir-specific technology rather than a universally effective EOR method.</p>","PeriodicalId":72922,"journal":{"name":"Engineering reports : open access","volume":"8 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eng2.70917","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering reports : open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eng2.70917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nanoparticle-assisted polymer flooding (NAPF) is increasingly investigated as a hybrid chemical enhanced oil recovery (EOR) strategy because nanoparticles (NPs) can modify polymer rheology, adsorption, interfacial behavior, and flow diversion under selected reservoir conditions. However, reported performance varies substantially with rock mineralogy, permeability, brine salinity, temperature, crude-oil composition, polymer type, nanoparticle chemistry, particle size, concentration, injection sequence, and slug volume. This review critically evaluates NAPF by separating experimentally verified mechanisms from condition-dependent or still-emerging claims. Evidence from rheology, adsorption tests, contact-angle measurements, interfacial-tension analysis, micromodel visualization, and core flooding is synthesized to show when NPs improve polymer flooding and when they may cause aggregation, retention, injectivity loss, or formation damage. The review also distinguishes validated reservoir-simulation approaches from semi-validated pore-scale and molecular models and speculative artificial intelligence (AI)/digital-twin frameworks. Field and pilot-scale reports are compared using standardized descriptors, including reservoir type, permeability, temperature, salinity, nanomaterial concentration, polymer dosage, slug design, injectivity response, water-cut trend, and incremental recovery. Finally, a structured research roadmap is proposed for formulation screening, model validation, field monitoring, techno-economic assessment, and environmental-risk evaluation. The review emphasizes that NAPF should be interpreted as a reservoir-specific technology rather than a universally effective EOR method.

Abstract Image

纳米颗粒辅助聚合物驱提高采收率:特定条件机制、建模可靠性和油田规模转换
纳米颗粒辅助聚合物驱(NAPF)作为一种混合化学提高采收率(EOR)的策略越来越受到研究,因为纳米颗粒(NPs)可以在特定的油藏条件下改变聚合物的流变性、吸附性、界面行为和导流性。然而,根据岩石矿物学、渗透率、盐水盐度、温度、原油成分、聚合物类型、纳米颗粒化学性质、颗粒大小、浓度、注入顺序和段塞流体积的不同,所报道的性能差异很大。本综述通过将实验验证的机制与条件依赖性或仍在出现的索赔分离开来,对NAPF进行了批判性评估。从流变学、吸附测试、接触角测量、界面张力分析、微观模型可视化和岩心驱油等方面综合得出的证据表明,NPs何时能改善聚合物驱油,何时可能导致聚集、滞留、注入损失或地层损害。该综述还将经过验证的油藏模拟方法与半验证的孔隙尺度和分子模型以及推测的人工智能(AI)/数字孪生框架进行了区分。现场报告和中试报告使用标准化描述符进行比较,包括油藏类型、渗透率、温度、盐度、纳米材料浓度、聚合物用量、段塞设计、注入能力响应、含水率趋势和增量采收率。最后,提出了配方筛选、模型验证、现场监测、技术经济评价和环境风险评价的结构化研究路线图。该综述强调,NAPF应被解释为一种特定于储层的技术,而不是一种普遍有效的提高采收率方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书