Abigail E Pine,Mary A Gum,Michelle M Liu,Joseph F McGuire
{"title":"Therapeutic Homework and Treatment Outcomes in Youth Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Internalizing Disorders: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Abigail E Pine,Mary A Gum,Michelle M Liu,Joseph F McGuire","doi":"10.1007/s10567-026-00579-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Homework adherence represents a salient, modifiable target for improving cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) outcomes for pediatric internalizing disorders. While the adult literature has found a clear connection between CBT homework adherence and treatment outcomes, the evidence among youth have been mixed regarding the extent to which between-session homework adherence predicts CBT outcomes. The present study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis that examines the association between homework adherence and CBT outcomes in clinical trials of internalizing disorders for youth. Fourteen studies met prespecified inclusion criteria, comprising a total sample of 1179 participants (M age = 11.33 years, 53.79% female). Random-effects meta-analytic models identified a small-to-moderate association between greater homework adherence and lower post-treatment symptoms (r = -0.23, p < 0.001). Interestingly, disorder type significantly moderated this association, such that the association between homework adherence and CBT outcomes was strongest in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) samples (r = -0.42), compared to anxiety (r = -0.14) and depression (r = -0.06). Findings underscore the importance of homework adherence as a mechanism of youth CBT, particularly for OCD. Enhancing homework adherence may help optimize CBT outcomes in pediatric populations.","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-026-00579-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Homework adherence represents a salient, modifiable target for improving cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) outcomes for pediatric internalizing disorders. While the adult literature has found a clear connection between CBT homework adherence and treatment outcomes, the evidence among youth have been mixed regarding the extent to which between-session homework adherence predicts CBT outcomes. The present study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis that examines the association between homework adherence and CBT outcomes in clinical trials of internalizing disorders for youth. Fourteen studies met prespecified inclusion criteria, comprising a total sample of 1179 participants (M age = 11.33 years, 53.79% female). Random-effects meta-analytic models identified a small-to-moderate association between greater homework adherence and lower post-treatment symptoms (r = -0.23, p < 0.001). Interestingly, disorder type significantly moderated this association, such that the association between homework adherence and CBT outcomes was strongest in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) samples (r = -0.42), compared to anxiety (r = -0.14) and depression (r = -0.06). Findings underscore the importance of homework adherence as a mechanism of youth CBT, particularly for OCD. Enhancing homework adherence may help optimize CBT outcomes in pediatric populations.
期刊介绍:
Editors-in-Chief: Dr. Ronald J. Prinz, University of South Carolina and Dr. Thomas H. Ollendick, Virginia Polytechnic Institute Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that provides an international, interdisciplinary forum in which important and new developments in this field are identified and in-depth reviews on current thought and practices are published. The Journal publishes original research reviews, conceptual and theoretical papers, and related work in the broad area of the behavioral sciences that pertains to infants, children, adolescents, and families. Contributions originate from a wide array of disciplines including, but not limited to, psychology (e.g., clinical, community, developmental, family, school), medicine (e.g., family practice, pediatrics, psychiatry), public health, social work, and education. Topical content includes science and application and covers facets of etiology, assessment, description, treatment and intervention, prevention, methodology, and public policy. Submissions are by invitation only and undergo peer review. The Editors, in consultation with the Editorial Board, invite highly qualified experts to contribute original papers on topics of timely interest and significance.