Climate change reshapes resource adequacy risks and optimal renewable energy siting in wind and solar energy systems

IF 70.1 1区 材料科学 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Liying Qiu, Rahman Khorramfar, Shen Wang, Saurabh Amin, Michael F. Howland
{"title":"Climate change reshapes resource adequacy risks and optimal renewable energy siting in wind and solar energy systems","authors":"Liying Qiu, Rahman Khorramfar, Shen Wang, Saurabh Amin, Michael F. Howland","doi":"10.1038/s41560-026-02109-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deep decarbonization through weather-dependent wind and solar can introduce resource adequacy risks. Climate change compounds these risks by simultaneously reshaping renewable supply and electricity demand in synergistic, region-specific ways. Here we show that long-term adequacy challenges in decarbonized grids arise from the interplay between meteorological conditions and system design, driven by prolonged renewable generation shortfalls tied to fine-scale infrastructure siting choices. Using 12-km climate projections with county-level power system optimization for New England and Texas, we find that climate change can increase resource inadequacy frequency up to fivefold by mid-century as rising cooling demand intersects with renewable resource declines or transmission bottlenecks. However, climate-informed planning provides cost-effective mitigation: Texas maintains adequacy at near-zero cost by pivoting wind capacity westward, while New England requires a modest 2.34% investment increase via solar and transmission expansion near load centres. Our findings demonstrate that achieving climate-resilient, decarbonized grids requires moving beyond aggregate capacity goals towards high-resolution, climate-informed spatial planning that reveals localized siting opportunities. Decarbonized grids may face rising resource adequacy risks as weather-driven renewable variability and climate change jointly affect supply and demand. A high-resolution model shows that these risks stem from multi-day power shortfalls and system design, but can be reduced through region-specific, climate-informed siting and transmission planning.","PeriodicalId":19073,"journal":{"name":"Nature Energy","volume":"11 10","pages":"1449-1458"},"PeriodicalIF":70.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Energy","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-026-02109-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deep decarbonization through weather-dependent wind and solar can introduce resource adequacy risks. Climate change compounds these risks by simultaneously reshaping renewable supply and electricity demand in synergistic, region-specific ways. Here we show that long-term adequacy challenges in decarbonized grids arise from the interplay between meteorological conditions and system design, driven by prolonged renewable generation shortfalls tied to fine-scale infrastructure siting choices. Using 12-km climate projections with county-level power system optimization for New England and Texas, we find that climate change can increase resource inadequacy frequency up to fivefold by mid-century as rising cooling demand intersects with renewable resource declines or transmission bottlenecks. However, climate-informed planning provides cost-effective mitigation: Texas maintains adequacy at near-zero cost by pivoting wind capacity westward, while New England requires a modest 2.34% investment increase via solar and transmission expansion near load centres. Our findings demonstrate that achieving climate-resilient, decarbonized grids requires moving beyond aggregate capacity goals towards high-resolution, climate-informed spatial planning that reveals localized siting opportunities. Decarbonized grids may face rising resource adequacy risks as weather-driven renewable variability and climate change jointly affect supply and demand. A high-resolution model shows that these risks stem from multi-day power shortfalls and system design, but can be reduced through region-specific, climate-informed siting and transmission planning.
气候变化重塑了风能和太阳能系统的资源充足性风险和最佳可再生能源选址
通过依赖天气的风能和太阳能进行深度脱碳可能会带来资源充足的风险。气候变化同时以协同的、特定区域的方式重塑可再生能源供应和电力需求,从而加剧了这些风险。在这里,我们表明脱碳电网的长期充足性挑战来自气象条件和系统设计之间的相互作用,由与精细基础设施选址选择相关的长期可再生能源发电短缺驱动。通过对新英格兰和德克萨斯州县级电力系统优化的12公里气候预测,我们发现,到本世纪中叶,随着不断上升的制冷需求与可再生资源下降或传输瓶颈相交,气候变化可能会使资源不足的频率增加五倍。然而,气候信息规划提供了具有成本效益的缓解措施:德克萨斯州通过将风力发电能力向西转移,以接近零的成本保持充足,而新英格兰需要通过在负荷中心附近扩建太阳能和输电系统,适度增加2.34%的投资。我们的研究结果表明,实现气候适应性、脱碳电网需要超越总容量目标,转向高分辨率、气候信息充足的空间规划,从而揭示本地化的选址机会。由于天气驱动的可再生能源变异性和气候变化共同影响供需,脱碳电网可能面临越来越大的资源充足风险。一项高分辨率模型显示,这些风险源于多日电力短缺和系统设计,但可以通过针对特定地区、考虑气候因素的选址和输电规划来降低风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Energy
Nature Energy Energy-Energy Engineering and Power Technology
CiteScore
75.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
193
期刊介绍: Nature Energy is a monthly, online-only journal committed to showcasing the most impactful research on energy, covering everything from its generation and distribution to the societal implications of energy technologies and policies. With a focus on exploring all facets of the ongoing energy discourse, Nature Energy delves into topics such as energy generation, storage, distribution, management, and the societal impacts of energy technologies and policies. Emphasizing studies that push the boundaries of knowledge and contribute to the development of next-generation solutions, the journal serves as a platform for the exchange of ideas among stakeholders at the forefront of the energy sector. Maintaining the hallmark standards of the Nature brand, Nature Energy boasts a dedicated team of professional editors, a rigorous peer-review process, meticulous copy-editing and production, rapid publication times, and editorial independence. In addition to original research articles, Nature Energy also publishes a range of content types, including Comments, Perspectives, Reviews, News & Views, Features, and Correspondence, covering a diverse array of disciplines relevant to the field of energy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书