Targeted tropical forest restoration can offset deforestation-induced water flux losses

IF 26.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Shuai Ma, Sha Zhou, David Ellison, Arie Staal, Taylor Smith, Callum Smith, Adriaan J. Teuling
{"title":"Targeted tropical forest restoration can offset deforestation-induced water flux losses","authors":"Shuai Ma, Sha Zhou, David Ellison, Arie Staal, Taylor Smith, Callum Smith, Adriaan J. Teuling","doi":"10.1038/s41558-026-02709-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tropical forest restoration is increasingly promoted as a nature-based solution for climate change mitigation, yet its capacity to reverse the hydrological impacts of deforestation remains unclear. Here we show forest gain increases evapotranspiration and precipitation more than forest loss reduces them. This hydrological asymmetry, driven by the rapid growth of young forests and enhanced moisture recycling, indicates that compensating for hydrological effects of deforestation requires restoring 43–63% and 53–83% of lost forest area in South America and Africa, respectively. In contrast, climatic conditions in Southeast Asia limit the potential of reforestation, underscoring the importance of forest conservation. Current climate models fail to capture these asymmetric responses, largely owing to poor representation of vegetation dynamics and age-dependent traits. Our findings call for reframing forest-based climate solutions through the lens of hydrological resilience, emphasizing the importance of spatially targeted, mechanism-informed restoration strategies to maximize ecosystem service co-benefits. The authors demonstrate asymmetrical impacts of forest gain and loss on evapotranspiration and precipitation: gain increases the processes more than loss reduces them. They highlight a need to better consider hydrological asymmetry in climate models and in planning of forest-based climate solutions.","PeriodicalId":18974,"journal":{"name":"Nature Climate Change","volume":"16 9","pages":"1075-1083"},"PeriodicalIF":26.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Climate Change","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-026-02709-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tropical forest restoration is increasingly promoted as a nature-based solution for climate change mitigation, yet its capacity to reverse the hydrological impacts of deforestation remains unclear. Here we show forest gain increases evapotranspiration and precipitation more than forest loss reduces them. This hydrological asymmetry, driven by the rapid growth of young forests and enhanced moisture recycling, indicates that compensating for hydrological effects of deforestation requires restoring 43–63% and 53–83% of lost forest area in South America and Africa, respectively. In contrast, climatic conditions in Southeast Asia limit the potential of reforestation, underscoring the importance of forest conservation. Current climate models fail to capture these asymmetric responses, largely owing to poor representation of vegetation dynamics and age-dependent traits. Our findings call for reframing forest-based climate solutions through the lens of hydrological resilience, emphasizing the importance of spatially targeted, mechanism-informed restoration strategies to maximize ecosystem service co-benefits. The authors demonstrate asymmetrical impacts of forest gain and loss on evapotranspiration and precipitation: gain increases the processes more than loss reduces them. They highlight a need to better consider hydrological asymmetry in climate models and in planning of forest-based climate solutions.
有针对性的热带森林恢复可以抵消毁林引起的水通量损失
热带森林恢复作为一种基于自然的缓解气候变化的解决办法日益得到推广,但其扭转毁林水文影响的能力仍不清楚。这里我们显示,森林增益增加的蒸散和降水比森林损失减少的蒸散和降水更多。这种水文不对称是由幼林的快速生长和水分循环的增强所驱动的,表明补偿森林砍伐的水文影响需要分别恢复南美洲和非洲损失森林面积的43-63%和53-83%。相比之下,东南亚的气候条件限制了重新造林的潜力,突出了森林养护的重要性。目前的气候模式无法捕捉到这些不对称的响应,这主要是由于植被动态和年龄相关特征的代表性不足。我们的研究结果呼吁通过水文恢复力的视角重新构建基于森林的气候解决方案,强调有空间针对性、基于机制的恢复策略的重要性,以最大限度地提高生态系统服务的协同效益。作者论证了森林收益和损失对蒸散和降水的不对称影响:收益增加了蒸散和降水过程,而损失减少了蒸散和降水过程。他们强调有必要在气候模型和基于森林的气候解决方案规划中更好地考虑水文不对称性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Climate Change
Nature Climate Change ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
40.30
自引率
1.60%
发文量
267
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature Climate Change is dedicated to addressing the scientific challenge of understanding Earth's changing climate and its societal implications. As a monthly journal, it publishes significant and cutting-edge research on the nature, causes, and impacts of global climate change, as well as its implications for the economy, policy, and the world at large. The journal publishes original research spanning the natural and social sciences, synthesizing interdisciplinary research to provide a comprehensive understanding of climate change. It upholds the high standards set by all Nature-branded journals, ensuring top-tier original research through a fair and rigorous review process, broad readership access, high standards of copy editing and production, rapid publication, and independence from academic societies and other vested interests. Nature Climate Change serves as a platform for discussion among experts, publishing opinion, analysis, and review articles. It also features Research Highlights to highlight important developments in the field and original reporting from renowned science journalists in the form of feature articles. Topics covered in the journal include adaptation, atmospheric science, ecology, economics, energy, impacts and vulnerability, mitigation, oceanography, policy, sociology, and sustainability, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书