Shuai Ma, Sha Zhou, David Ellison, Arie Staal, Taylor Smith, Callum Smith, Adriaan J. Teuling
{"title":"Targeted tropical forest restoration can offset deforestation-induced water flux losses","authors":"Shuai Ma, Sha Zhou, David Ellison, Arie Staal, Taylor Smith, Callum Smith, Adriaan J. Teuling","doi":"10.1038/s41558-026-02709-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tropical forest restoration is increasingly promoted as a nature-based solution for climate change mitigation, yet its capacity to reverse the hydrological impacts of deforestation remains unclear. Here we show forest gain increases evapotranspiration and precipitation more than forest loss reduces them. This hydrological asymmetry, driven by the rapid growth of young forests and enhanced moisture recycling, indicates that compensating for hydrological effects of deforestation requires restoring 43–63% and 53–83% of lost forest area in South America and Africa, respectively. In contrast, climatic conditions in Southeast Asia limit the potential of reforestation, underscoring the importance of forest conservation. Current climate models fail to capture these asymmetric responses, largely owing to poor representation of vegetation dynamics and age-dependent traits. Our findings call for reframing forest-based climate solutions through the lens of hydrological resilience, emphasizing the importance of spatially targeted, mechanism-informed restoration strategies to maximize ecosystem service co-benefits. The authors demonstrate asymmetrical impacts of forest gain and loss on evapotranspiration and precipitation: gain increases the processes more than loss reduces them. They highlight a need to better consider hydrological asymmetry in climate models and in planning of forest-based climate solutions.","PeriodicalId":18974,"journal":{"name":"Nature Climate Change","volume":"16 9","pages":"1075-1083"},"PeriodicalIF":26.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Climate Change","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-026-02709-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Tropical forest restoration is increasingly promoted as a nature-based solution for climate change mitigation, yet its capacity to reverse the hydrological impacts of deforestation remains unclear. Here we show forest gain increases evapotranspiration and precipitation more than forest loss reduces them. This hydrological asymmetry, driven by the rapid growth of young forests and enhanced moisture recycling, indicates that compensating for hydrological effects of deforestation requires restoring 43–63% and 53–83% of lost forest area in South America and Africa, respectively. In contrast, climatic conditions in Southeast Asia limit the potential of reforestation, underscoring the importance of forest conservation. Current climate models fail to capture these asymmetric responses, largely owing to poor representation of vegetation dynamics and age-dependent traits. Our findings call for reframing forest-based climate solutions through the lens of hydrological resilience, emphasizing the importance of spatially targeted, mechanism-informed restoration strategies to maximize ecosystem service co-benefits. The authors demonstrate asymmetrical impacts of forest gain and loss on evapotranspiration and precipitation: gain increases the processes more than loss reduces them. They highlight a need to better consider hydrological asymmetry in climate models and in planning of forest-based climate solutions.
期刊介绍:
Nature Climate Change is dedicated to addressing the scientific challenge of understanding Earth's changing climate and its societal implications. As a monthly journal, it publishes significant and cutting-edge research on the nature, causes, and impacts of global climate change, as well as its implications for the economy, policy, and the world at large.
The journal publishes original research spanning the natural and social sciences, synthesizing interdisciplinary research to provide a comprehensive understanding of climate change. It upholds the high standards set by all Nature-branded journals, ensuring top-tier original research through a fair and rigorous review process, broad readership access, high standards of copy editing and production, rapid publication, and independence from academic societies and other vested interests.
Nature Climate Change serves as a platform for discussion among experts, publishing opinion, analysis, and review articles. It also features Research Highlights to highlight important developments in the field and original reporting from renowned science journalists in the form of feature articles.
Topics covered in the journal include adaptation, atmospheric science, ecology, economics, energy, impacts and vulnerability, mitigation, oceanography, policy, sociology, and sustainability, among others.