Machine learning prediction of CO₂ solubility in deep eutectic solvent-MDEA mixtures

IF 6.2 3区 材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Amir Hossein Sheikhshoaei, Ali Sanati
{"title":"Machine learning prediction of CO₂ solubility in deep eutectic solvent-MDEA mixtures","authors":"Amir Hossein Sheikhshoaei,&nbsp;Ali Sanati","doi":"10.1007/s42823-026-01082-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study introduces machine learning (ML) models to predict CO₂ solubility in mixtures of a deep eutectic solvent (tetrabutylammonium bromide: ethylene glycol, 1:4 molar ratio) and methyldiethanolamine (MDEA). To ensure robust extrapolation capabilities and prevent potential data leakage, a rigorous grouped validation strategy, known as “Leave-One-Composition-Out,” was implemented, replacing conventional random data splitting. Four ML algorithms, Gradient Boosting (GBoost), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), AdaBoost-SVR, and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), were evaluated using temperature, pressure, and MDEA weight% as input features. Results revealed that the GPR model outperformed all others across all statistical metrics, achieving an <span>\\({R}^{2}\\)</span> value of 0.996 and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.2839%. Furthermore, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis identified pressure as the most significant driving factor for CO<sub>2</sub> solubility, while temperature exhibited an inverse correlation. Crucially, this perfect alignment with fundamental principles clearly demonstrates that the model successfully learned the underlying thermodynamic relationships rather than merely memorizing numerical data. Finally, leverage validation confirmed that 99.16% of the data points safely reside within the model’s valid applicability domain. This work establishes the developed GPR framework as a highly reliable and physically consistent approach for predicting CO₂ solubility and optimizing complex multi-component capture systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":506,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Letters","volume":"36 4","pages":"1667 - 1679"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Letters","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42823-026-01082-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study introduces machine learning (ML) models to predict CO₂ solubility in mixtures of a deep eutectic solvent (tetrabutylammonium bromide: ethylene glycol, 1:4 molar ratio) and methyldiethanolamine (MDEA). To ensure robust extrapolation capabilities and prevent potential data leakage, a rigorous grouped validation strategy, known as “Leave-One-Composition-Out,” was implemented, replacing conventional random data splitting. Four ML algorithms, Gradient Boosting (GBoost), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), AdaBoost-SVR, and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), were evaluated using temperature, pressure, and MDEA weight% as input features. Results revealed that the GPR model outperformed all others across all statistical metrics, achieving an \({R}^{2}\) value of 0.996 and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.2839%. Furthermore, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis identified pressure as the most significant driving factor for CO2 solubility, while temperature exhibited an inverse correlation. Crucially, this perfect alignment with fundamental principles clearly demonstrates that the model successfully learned the underlying thermodynamic relationships rather than merely memorizing numerical data. Finally, leverage validation confirmed that 99.16% of the data points safely reside within the model’s valid applicability domain. This work establishes the developed GPR framework as a highly reliable and physically consistent approach for predicting CO₂ solubility and optimizing complex multi-component capture systems.

机器学习预测CO₂在深度共晶溶剂- mdea混合物中的溶解度
本研究引入机器学习(ML)模型来预测CO₂在深度共晶溶剂(四丁基溴化铵:乙二醇,1:4摩尔比)和甲基二乙醇胺(MDEA)混合物中的溶解度。为了确保强大的外推能力并防止潜在的数据泄漏,实现了一种严格的分组验证策略,称为“Leave-One-Composition-Out”,以取代传统的随机数据分割。使用温度、压力和MDEA权重对梯度增强(GBoost)、高斯过程回归(GPR)、AdaBoost-SVR和多层感知器(MLP)四种ML算法进行评估% as input features. Results revealed that the GPR model outperformed all others across all statistical metrics, achieving an \({R}^{2}\) value of 0.996 and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.2839%. Furthermore, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis identified pressure as the most significant driving factor for CO2 solubility, while temperature exhibited an inverse correlation. Crucially, this perfect alignment with fundamental principles clearly demonstrates that the model successfully learned the underlying thermodynamic relationships rather than merely memorizing numerical data. Finally, leverage validation confirmed that 99.16% of the data points safely reside within the model’s valid applicability domain. This work establishes the developed GPR framework as a highly reliable and physically consistent approach for predicting CO₂ solubility and optimizing complex multi-component capture systems.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Carbon Letters
Carbon Letters CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Carbon Letters aims to be a comprehensive journal with complete coverage of carbon materials and carbon-rich molecules. These materials range from, but are not limited to, diamond and graphite through chars, semicokes, mesophase substances, carbon fibers, carbon nanotubes, graphenes, carbon blacks, activated carbons, pyrolytic carbons, glass-like carbons, etc. Papers on the secondary production of new carbon and composite materials from the above mentioned various carbons are within the scope of the journal. Papers on organic substances, including coals, will be considered only if the research has close relation to the resulting carbon materials. Carbon Letters also seeks to keep abreast of new developments in their specialist fields and to unite in finding alternative energy solutions to current issues such as the greenhouse effect and the depletion of the ozone layer. The renewable energy basics, energy storage and conversion, solar energy, wind energy, water energy, nuclear energy, biomass energy, hydrogen production technology, and other clean energy technologies are also within the scope of the journal. Carbon Letters invites original reports of fundamental research in all branches of the theory and practice of carbon science and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书