Jee Young Joo, Megan Liu, Youngwoo Cho, Hyungbin Cho
{"title":"Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence-Based Nursing Interventions for Chronic Illness Care: Umbrella Review.","authors":"Jee Young Joo, Megan Liu, Youngwoo Cho, Hyungbin Cho","doi":"10.2196/97905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI)-based nursing interventions are increasingly being used to manage chronic illnesses; however, their definitive impact on clinical outcomes remains inconclusive, necessitating a comprehensive evidence synthesis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This umbrella review aimed to synthesize the evidence regarding the effectiveness of AI-based nursing interventions for chronic illness care and their subsequent impact on health care outcomes in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an umbrella review and prospectively registered the protocol. A systematic search of 5 electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science) was performed to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in English between 2021 and 2025. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight high-quality systematic reviews were included, with machine learning identified as the predominant technology. Three primary outcome domains emerged: predictive, psychosocial, and hospital utilization. Due to measurement heterogeneity, the results were synthesized narratively. Our findings demonstrated that AI-based nursing interventions are effective in predicting adverse clinical events, unplanned hospital utilization, and health care costs. However, evidence regarding psychosocial outcomes remains insufficient.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review provides systematic evidence supporting the utility of AI in chronic illness management, particularly for improving predictive and utilization outcomes. These findings offer actionable insights for nursing leaders to integrate AI into clinical practice and education. Future research should prioritize rigorous empirical designs to further strengthen the evidence base for AI-driven nursing care.</p>","PeriodicalId":73556,"journal":{"name":"JMIR nursing","volume":"9 ","pages":"e97905"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13373462/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/97905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI)-based nursing interventions are increasingly being used to manage chronic illnesses; however, their definitive impact on clinical outcomes remains inconclusive, necessitating a comprehensive evidence synthesis.
Objective: This umbrella review aimed to synthesize the evidence regarding the effectiveness of AI-based nursing interventions for chronic illness care and their subsequent impact on health care outcomes in clinical settings.
Methods: We conducted an umbrella review and prospectively registered the protocol. A systematic search of 5 electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science) was performed to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in English between 2021 and 2025. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist.
Results: Eight high-quality systematic reviews were included, with machine learning identified as the predominant technology. Three primary outcome domains emerged: predictive, psychosocial, and hospital utilization. Due to measurement heterogeneity, the results were synthesized narratively. Our findings demonstrated that AI-based nursing interventions are effective in predicting adverse clinical events, unplanned hospital utilization, and health care costs. However, evidence regarding psychosocial outcomes remains insufficient.
Conclusions: This review provides systematic evidence supporting the utility of AI in chronic illness management, particularly for improving predictive and utilization outcomes. These findings offer actionable insights for nursing leaders to integrate AI into clinical practice and education. Future research should prioritize rigorous empirical designs to further strengthen the evidence base for AI-driven nursing care.
背景:基于人工智能(AI)的护理干预越来越多地用于管理慢性疾病;然而,它们对临床结果的决定性影响仍不确定,需要全面的证据综合。目的:本综述旨在综合有关基于人工智能的护理干预对慢性疾病护理的有效性及其对临床环境中卫生保健结果的后续影响的证据。方法:我们进行了一项总括性综述,并前瞻性地注册了该方案。系统检索了5个电子数据库(PubMed、CINAHL、Cochrane Library、Scopus和Web of Science),以确定2021年至2025年间发表的英文系统综述和荟萃分析。采用乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)关键评估清单对纳入研究的方法学质量进行评估。结果:纳入了8个高质量的系统评价,机器学习被确定为主要技术。出现了三个主要结果领域:预测性、社会心理和医院利用。由于测量的异质性,结果是叙述性的综合。我们的研究结果表明,基于人工智能的护理干预在预测不良临床事件、计划外医院利用和医疗保健成本方面是有效的。然而,关于社会心理结果的证据仍然不足。结论:本综述提供了系统的证据,支持人工智能在慢性疾病管理中的应用,特别是在改善预测和利用结果方面。这些发现为护理领导者将人工智能整合到临床实践和教育中提供了可操作的见解。未来的研究应优先考虑严谨的实证设计,进一步加强人工智能驱动护理的证据基础。