Development and pilot validation of a chemiluminescence immunoassay for monitoring immunologic changes during peanut oral immunotherapy using sIgE/sIgG4 ratio.
Xiao Yang, Austin Vanderkallen, J Joanna Yu, Jinguo Chen, Lili Wan, H Henry Li, Zhongxin Li, Yuhuang Zhu, Iris Xi
{"title":"Development and pilot validation of a chemiluminescence immunoassay for monitoring immunologic changes during peanut oral immunotherapy using sIgE/sIgG4 ratio.","authors":"Xiao Yang, Austin Vanderkallen, J Joanna Yu, Jinguo Chen, Lili Wan, H Henry Li, Zhongxin Li, Yuhuang Zhu, Iris Xi","doi":"10.3389/falgy.2026.1850931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The sIgE/sIgG4 ratio has been proposed as a dynamic measure of immune modulation during peanut oral immunotherapy (OIT). This study evaluated a chemiluminescent immunoassay for simultaneous quantification of peanut-specific sIgE and sIgG4 on the automated Autolumo A2000 Plus platform.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analytical performance was assessed for peanut, Ara h 2, and Ara h 6 sIgE and sIgG4. Method comparison with ImmunoCAP was performed across the measurable concentration range. In a separate retrospective pilot cohort of 23 peanut-allergic patients undergoing OIT, longitudinal sIgE, sIgG4 and sIgE/sIgG4 ratio trajectories were compared between A2000 and ImmunoCAP. Associations between ratio trajectories and OIT dose escalation were evaluated as an exploratory treatment-progression measure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The A2000 Plus demonstrated high analytical sensitivity (sIgE LOQ < 0.05 kU/L; sIgG4 LOQ < 0.06 mg/L), precision (intra- and inter-assay CVs < 3% and <5%, respectively), and linearity (R² > 0.990). Method comparison with ImmunoCAP showed high positive percent agreement (82%-97%) and negative percent agreement (92%-100%), with strong concordance for log(sIgE) (<i>ρ</i> = 0.9041), and log(sIgG4) (<i>ρ</i> = 0.8464). Longitudinal analysis showed increased sIgG4 levels and decreased sIgE/sIgG4 ratio over time (<i>p</i> < 0.001), paralleling OIT dose escalation. Log(sIgE/sIgG4) ratio trajectories were strongly concordant between platforms across peanut, Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 (<i>ρ</i> = 0.900-0.917).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Autolumo A2000 Plus demonstrated strong analytical performance and captured expected immunologic trends during peanut OIT. These findings support further investigation of this platform as a potential complementary monitoring tool in OIT. Larger prospective studies are required to establish clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":73062,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in allergy","volume":"7 ","pages":"1850931"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13368872/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2026.1850931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The sIgE/sIgG4 ratio has been proposed as a dynamic measure of immune modulation during peanut oral immunotherapy (OIT). This study evaluated a chemiluminescent immunoassay for simultaneous quantification of peanut-specific sIgE and sIgG4 on the automated Autolumo A2000 Plus platform.
Methods: Analytical performance was assessed for peanut, Ara h 2, and Ara h 6 sIgE and sIgG4. Method comparison with ImmunoCAP was performed across the measurable concentration range. In a separate retrospective pilot cohort of 23 peanut-allergic patients undergoing OIT, longitudinal sIgE, sIgG4 and sIgE/sIgG4 ratio trajectories were compared between A2000 and ImmunoCAP. Associations between ratio trajectories and OIT dose escalation were evaluated as an exploratory treatment-progression measure.
Results: The A2000 Plus demonstrated high analytical sensitivity (sIgE LOQ < 0.05 kU/L; sIgG4 LOQ < 0.06 mg/L), precision (intra- and inter-assay CVs < 3% and <5%, respectively), and linearity (R² > 0.990). Method comparison with ImmunoCAP showed high positive percent agreement (82%-97%) and negative percent agreement (92%-100%), with strong concordance for log(sIgE) (ρ = 0.9041), and log(sIgG4) (ρ = 0.8464). Longitudinal analysis showed increased sIgG4 levels and decreased sIgE/sIgG4 ratio over time (p < 0.001), paralleling OIT dose escalation. Log(sIgE/sIgG4) ratio trajectories were strongly concordant between platforms across peanut, Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 (ρ = 0.900-0.917).
Conclusion: The Autolumo A2000 Plus demonstrated strong analytical performance and captured expected immunologic trends during peanut OIT. These findings support further investigation of this platform as a potential complementary monitoring tool in OIT. Larger prospective studies are required to establish clinical utility.