Development and pilot validation of a chemiluminescence immunoassay for monitoring immunologic changes during peanut oral immunotherapy using sIgE/sIgG4 ratio.

IF 3.4 Q2 ALLERGY
Frontiers in allergy Pub Date : 2026-07-01 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/falgy.2026.1850931
Xiao Yang, Austin Vanderkallen, J Joanna Yu, Jinguo Chen, Lili Wan, H Henry Li, Zhongxin Li, Yuhuang Zhu, Iris Xi
{"title":"Development and pilot validation of a chemiluminescence immunoassay for monitoring immunologic changes during peanut oral immunotherapy using sIgE/sIgG4 ratio.","authors":"Xiao Yang, Austin Vanderkallen, J Joanna Yu, Jinguo Chen, Lili Wan, H Henry Li, Zhongxin Li, Yuhuang Zhu, Iris Xi","doi":"10.3389/falgy.2026.1850931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The sIgE/sIgG4 ratio has been proposed as a dynamic measure of immune modulation during peanut oral immunotherapy (OIT). This study evaluated a chemiluminescent immunoassay for simultaneous quantification of peanut-specific sIgE and sIgG4 on the automated Autolumo A2000 Plus platform.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analytical performance was assessed for peanut, Ara h 2, and Ara h 6 sIgE and sIgG4. Method comparison with ImmunoCAP was performed across the measurable concentration range. In a separate retrospective pilot cohort of 23 peanut-allergic patients undergoing OIT, longitudinal sIgE, sIgG4 and sIgE/sIgG4 ratio trajectories were compared between A2000 and ImmunoCAP. Associations between ratio trajectories and OIT dose escalation were evaluated as an exploratory treatment-progression measure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The A2000 Plus demonstrated high analytical sensitivity (sIgE LOQ < 0.05 kU/L; sIgG4 LOQ < 0.06 mg/L), precision (intra- and inter-assay CVs < 3% and <5%, respectively), and linearity (R² > 0.990). Method comparison with ImmunoCAP showed high positive percent agreement (82%-97%) and negative percent agreement (92%-100%), with strong concordance for log(sIgE) (<i>ρ</i> = 0.9041), and log(sIgG4) (<i>ρ</i> = 0.8464). Longitudinal analysis showed increased sIgG4 levels and decreased sIgE/sIgG4 ratio over time (<i>p</i> < 0.001), paralleling OIT dose escalation. Log(sIgE/sIgG4) ratio trajectories were strongly concordant between platforms across peanut, Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 (<i>ρ</i> = 0.900-0.917).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Autolumo A2000 Plus demonstrated strong analytical performance and captured expected immunologic trends during peanut OIT. These findings support further investigation of this platform as a potential complementary monitoring tool in OIT. Larger prospective studies are required to establish clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":73062,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in allergy","volume":"7 ","pages":"1850931"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13368872/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2026.1850931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The sIgE/sIgG4 ratio has been proposed as a dynamic measure of immune modulation during peanut oral immunotherapy (OIT). This study evaluated a chemiluminescent immunoassay for simultaneous quantification of peanut-specific sIgE and sIgG4 on the automated Autolumo A2000 Plus platform.

Methods: Analytical performance was assessed for peanut, Ara h 2, and Ara h 6 sIgE and sIgG4. Method comparison with ImmunoCAP was performed across the measurable concentration range. In a separate retrospective pilot cohort of 23 peanut-allergic patients undergoing OIT, longitudinal sIgE, sIgG4 and sIgE/sIgG4 ratio trajectories were compared between A2000 and ImmunoCAP. Associations between ratio trajectories and OIT dose escalation were evaluated as an exploratory treatment-progression measure.

Results: The A2000 Plus demonstrated high analytical sensitivity (sIgE LOQ < 0.05 kU/L; sIgG4 LOQ < 0.06 mg/L), precision (intra- and inter-assay CVs < 3% and <5%, respectively), and linearity (R² > 0.990). Method comparison with ImmunoCAP showed high positive percent agreement (82%-97%) and negative percent agreement (92%-100%), with strong concordance for log(sIgE) (ρ = 0.9041), and log(sIgG4) (ρ = 0.8464). Longitudinal analysis showed increased sIgG4 levels and decreased sIgE/sIgG4 ratio over time (p < 0.001), paralleling OIT dose escalation. Log(sIgE/sIgG4) ratio trajectories were strongly concordant between platforms across peanut, Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 (ρ = 0.900-0.917).

Conclusion: The Autolumo A2000 Plus demonstrated strong analytical performance and captured expected immunologic trends during peanut OIT. These findings support further investigation of this platform as a potential complementary monitoring tool in OIT. Larger prospective studies are required to establish clinical utility.

利用sIgE/sIgG4比值监测花生口服免疫治疗期间免疫变化的化学发光免疫分析法的开发和中试验证
背景:sIgE/sIgG4比值已被提出作为花生口服免疫治疗(OIT)期间免疫调节的动态指标。本研究评估了在自动化Autolumo A2000 Plus平台上同时定量花生特异性sIgE和sIgG4的化学发光免疫分析法。方法:对花生、Ara h 2、Ara h 6 sIgE和sIgG4进行分析性能评价。方法在可测浓度范围内与ImmunoCAP进行比较。在一个单独的回顾性试点队列中,23名花生过敏患者接受了OIT,比较了A2000和ImmunoCAP之间的纵向sIgE、sIgG4和sIgE/sIgG4比值轨迹。比值轨迹和OIT剂量递增之间的关联作为一种探索性治疗进展测量进行了评估。结果:A2000 Plus具有较高的分析灵敏度(sIgE LOQ < 0.05 kU/L; sIgG4 LOQ < 0.06 mg/L)、精密度(组内、组间CVs < 3%和0.990)。方法与ImmunoCAP比较显示高阳性率(82% ~ 97%)和阴性率(92% ~ 100%),对数(sIgE) (ρ = 0.9041)和对数(sIgG4) (ρ = 0.8464)具有很强的一致性。纵向分析显示,随着时间的推移,sIgG4水平升高,sIgE/sIgG4比值降低(p ρ = 0.900 ~ 0.917)。结论:Autolumo A2000 Plus具有较强的分析性能,并能捕捉到花生OIT过程中预期的免疫趋势。这些发现支持进一步研究该平台作为OIT潜在的补充监测工具。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来确定临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书