Aligning Care to Cognitive Style: A 4-Question Framework for Patient-Centered Dermatology Visits.

Q2 Medicine
Elise Lau, Jeremy Haskins, Vishnu Palaniappan, Kumar Nadhan
{"title":"Aligning Care to Cognitive Style: A 4-Question Framework for Patient-Centered Dermatology Visits.","authors":"Elise Lau, Jeremy Haskins, Vishnu Palaniappan, Kumar Nadhan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To improve patient-centered dermatology care by identifying how patients prefer to approach medical decision-making and structuring their visit, using a brief 4-question intake survey focused on cognitive style.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>New patients at 2 dermatology clinics within the California Skin Institute completed a multiple-choice intake questionnaire before their first visit. The survey asked patients how many concerns they wanted to address, how much guidance they preferred in selecting treatment, whether they prioritized diagnosis or treatment during the visit, and their expected timeline for results. Associations between patient responses and demographics (sex, age, chief complaint) were analyzed using χ<sup>2</sup> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 257 patients (mean age: 38; 43% female), 96% of patients preferred to address only 1 or 2 concerns during their first visit; 75% preferred shared decision-making and 70% prioritized discussing treatment over their medical history. Patients bringing multiple concerns were significantly more likely to prefer autonomous decision-making (χ<sup>2</sup>=24.0; <i>P</i><0.001). Women more often preferred to discuss multiple concerns and to balance history with treatment (both <i>P</i><0.01), while men leaned toward single-concern, treatment-focused visits.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Single-center design and moderate sample size may limit generalizability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This brief, previsit framework offers a structured method to align dermatologic care with patients' cognitive and decision-making preferences-enhancing efficiency, rapport, and mutual understanding prior to the clinical encounter. By facilitating clearer communication from the outset, it may improve the quality of patient-centered care. Future studies will explore whether tailoring consultation styles to patient preferences can impact adherence, satisfaction, and clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":53616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology","volume":"19 5","pages":"50-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13372301/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To improve patient-centered dermatology care by identifying how patients prefer to approach medical decision-making and structuring their visit, using a brief 4-question intake survey focused on cognitive style.

Methods: New patients at 2 dermatology clinics within the California Skin Institute completed a multiple-choice intake questionnaire before their first visit. The survey asked patients how many concerns they wanted to address, how much guidance they preferred in selecting treatment, whether they prioritized diagnosis or treatment during the visit, and their expected timeline for results. Associations between patient responses and demographics (sex, age, chief complaint) were analyzed using χ2 tests.

Results: Among 257 patients (mean age: 38; 43% female), 96% of patients preferred to address only 1 or 2 concerns during their first visit; 75% preferred shared decision-making and 70% prioritized discussing treatment over their medical history. Patients bringing multiple concerns were significantly more likely to prefer autonomous decision-making (χ2=24.0; P<0.001). Women more often preferred to discuss multiple concerns and to balance history with treatment (both P<0.01), while men leaned toward single-concern, treatment-focused visits.

Limitations: Single-center design and moderate sample size may limit generalizability.

Conclusion: This brief, previsit framework offers a structured method to align dermatologic care with patients' cognitive and decision-making preferences-enhancing efficiency, rapport, and mutual understanding prior to the clinical encounter. By facilitating clearer communication from the outset, it may improve the quality of patient-centered care. Future studies will explore whether tailoring consultation styles to patient preferences can impact adherence, satisfaction, and clinical outcomes.

将护理与认知风格相一致:以患者为中心的皮肤科就诊的4个问题框架。
目的:通过一项以认知风格为重点的简短的4问题摄入调查,通过确定患者倾向于如何处理医疗决策和组织他们的就诊,以改善以患者为中心的皮肤科护理。方法:加州皮肤研究所2个皮肤科诊所的新患者在第一次就诊前完成了一份选择问卷。该调查询问患者他们想要解决多少问题,他们在选择治疗时喜欢多少指导,他们在就诊期间是否优先考虑诊断或治疗,以及他们预期的结果时间表。采用χ2检验分析患者反应与人口统计学(性别、年龄、主诉)之间的相关性。结果:257例患者(平均年龄:38岁,43%为女性)中,96%的患者倾向于在第一次就诊时只解决1或2个问题;75%的人更喜欢共同决策,70%的人优先讨论治疗而不是他们的病史。有多重顾虑的患者更倾向于自主决策(χ2=24.0);研究局限性:单中心设计和中等样本量可能限制了通用性。结论:这个简短的会诊前框架提供了一种结构化的方法,使皮肤科护理与患者的认知和决策偏好相一致,从而提高了临床相遇前的效率、融洽关系和相互理解。通过从一开始就促进更清晰的沟通,它可以提高以病人为中心的护理质量。未来的研究将探讨是否根据患者的喜好定制咨询方式可以影响依从性、满意度和临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书