Teaching About Social Practices and Structures in Continuing Professional Development: A Multiple Case Study in Quality Improvement and Interprofessional Collaboration.

IF 1.8 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Joanne Goldman, Farah Friesen, Tara Burra, Lindsay Baker, Maria Tassone, Stella L Ng
{"title":"Teaching About Social Practices and Structures in Continuing Professional Development: A Multiple Case Study in Quality Improvement and Interprofessional Collaboration.","authors":"Joanne Goldman, Farah Friesen, Tara Burra, Lindsay Baker, Maria Tassone, Stella L Ng","doi":"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Continuing professional development (CPD) about social processes and structures (eg, power relations, organizational policies) in health care has been minimally explored. This study examined the teaching of social practices and structures in the domains of interprofessional collaboration and quality improvement, and the education paradigms used, with particular attention to transformative education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This case study included three CPD cases at two university-affiliated Centres. Data collection included observations (n = 42.5 hours), interviews with program/Centre leads and guest presenters (n = 13), and documents. Paradigms of education informed the interpretive thematic analysis conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A range of concepts related to social practices and structures were introduced across sessions (eg, systemic racism, unconscious bias). An examination of education purpose, role of teacher-learner, and teaching modalities, demonstrated that varied paradigms of education (eg, cognitivist, constructivist) were drawn on to teach these topics, with efforts toward transformative approaches. Programs were largely oriented to practical learning and application, with the teacher positioned as expert or learners being encouraged to interact with, and learn from each other. However, participants recognized additional education purposes aligned with a transformative paradigm, to question and shift learners' perspectives, making efforts to align teacher-learner roles and learning modalities. There were tensions, though, working across paradigms; session formats and learner/sponsor expectations influenced paradigms used.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings provide insights to how to incorporate content about social practices and structures into interprofessional collaboration and quality improvement CPD. Given the multiple and sometimes competing education goals, positioning paradigms of education as coexisting layers may be more effective than viewing them as mutually exclusive.</p>","PeriodicalId":50218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000661","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Continuing professional development (CPD) about social processes and structures (eg, power relations, organizational policies) in health care has been minimally explored. This study examined the teaching of social practices and structures in the domains of interprofessional collaboration and quality improvement, and the education paradigms used, with particular attention to transformative education.

Methods: This case study included three CPD cases at two university-affiliated Centres. Data collection included observations (n = 42.5 hours), interviews with program/Centre leads and guest presenters (n = 13), and documents. Paradigms of education informed the interpretive thematic analysis conducted.

Results: A range of concepts related to social practices and structures were introduced across sessions (eg, systemic racism, unconscious bias). An examination of education purpose, role of teacher-learner, and teaching modalities, demonstrated that varied paradigms of education (eg, cognitivist, constructivist) were drawn on to teach these topics, with efforts toward transformative approaches. Programs were largely oriented to practical learning and application, with the teacher positioned as expert or learners being encouraged to interact with, and learn from each other. However, participants recognized additional education purposes aligned with a transformative paradigm, to question and shift learners' perspectives, making efforts to align teacher-learner roles and learning modalities. There were tensions, though, working across paradigms; session formats and learner/sponsor expectations influenced paradigms used.

Discussion: Findings provide insights to how to incorporate content about social practices and structures into interprofessional collaboration and quality improvement CPD. Given the multiple and sometimes competing education goals, positioning paradigms of education as coexisting layers may be more effective than viewing them as mutually exclusive.

关于持续专业发展中的社会实践和结构的教学:质量改进和跨专业合作的多个案例研究。
导言:持续专业发展(CPD)的社会过程和结构(如,权力关系,组织政策)在卫生保健方面的探索很少。本研究考察了跨专业合作和质量改进领域的社会实践和结构的教学,以及所使用的教育范式,特别关注变革教育。方法:本案例研究包括两所大学附属中心的三例CPD病例。数据收集包括观察(n = 42.5小时)、与项目/中心负责人和嘉宾主持人的访谈(n = 13)和文件。教育范式为解释性主题分析提供了依据。结果:一系列与社会实践和社会结构相关的概念被引入各个环节(例如,系统性种族主义,无意识偏见)。对教育目的、教师-学习者角色和教学模式的考察表明,不同的教育范式(例如,认知主义、建构主义)被用来教授这些主题,并努力采用变革方法。课程主要以实际学习和应用为导向,教师被定位为专家或学习者,鼓励他们相互交流,相互学习。然而,与会者认识到与变革范式相一致的额外教育目的,质疑和转变学习者的观点,努力使教师-学习者的角色和学习方式保持一致。不过,在不同的范式中,也存在紧张关系;会话格式和学习者/赞助者期望影响范式的使用。讨论:研究结果为如何将社会实践和结构的内容纳入专业间合作和质量改进CPD提供了见解。考虑到多重的,有时是相互竞争的教育目标,将教育范式定位为共存的层次可能比将它们视为相互排斥更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Continuing Education is a quarterly journal publishing articles relevant to theory, practice, and policy development for continuing education in the health sciences. The journal presents original research and essays on subjects involving the lifelong learning of professionals, with a focus on continuous quality improvement, competency assessment, and knowledge translation. It provides thoughtful advice to those who develop, conduct, and evaluate continuing education programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书