Validity and reliability of intraoral ultrasonography for the assessment of human periodontal structures.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Su-Jeong Kim, Kyu-Lim Lee, Jiong-Zhen Piao, Kyung-Seok Hu, Hee-Jin Kim
{"title":"Validity and reliability of intraoral ultrasonography for the assessment of human periodontal structures.","authors":"Su-Jeong Kim, Kyu-Lim Lee, Jiong-Zhen Piao, Kyung-Seok Hu, Hee-Jin Kim","doi":"10.1007/s00276-026-03934-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recent advances in intraoral ultrasonography (US) have enabled quantitative evaluation of periodontal tissues; however, limitations regarding applicable measurement sites and structural visualization remain. This study aimed to investigate the anatomical accuracy and measurement reproducibility of intraoral US imaging for soft and hard periodontal tissues, comprising buccal and lingual palatal surfaces and dental calculus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>US images were captured from the gingival margin (GM), alveolar bone crest (ABC), and cementoenamel junction (CEJ) of 108 teeth from fixed human cadavers. These regions were sectioned and scanned to generate reference images. Three parameters were measured: (1) the distance between the ABC and GM, (2) the distance between the ABC and CEJ, and (3) the linear length of the dental calculus on the tooth surface. Three independent examiners performed all measurements twice for reliability analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>US images clearly delineated the gingiva, CEJ, alveolar bone, and calculus based on their echogenic characteristics. No statistically significant differences were observed between the US and reference measurements (p > 0.05). Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.78 to 0.97 for intra-rater and 0.92 to 0.96 for inter-rater reliability. Bland-Altman analysis revealed 95% limits of agreement of - 0.27 to 0.94 mm for ABC-GM, - 0.28 to 1.12 mm for ABC-CEJ, and - 0.22 to 0.81 mm for calculus length. These findings confirm that intraoral US reliably represents anatomical structures with high fidelity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>US is a valid, reproducible modality for evaluating ABC, GM, CEJ, and calculus across buccal and lingual surfaces, providing a standardized anatomical foundation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49461,"journal":{"name":"Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-026-03934-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Recent advances in intraoral ultrasonography (US) have enabled quantitative evaluation of periodontal tissues; however, limitations regarding applicable measurement sites and structural visualization remain. This study aimed to investigate the anatomical accuracy and measurement reproducibility of intraoral US imaging for soft and hard periodontal tissues, comprising buccal and lingual palatal surfaces and dental calculus.

Methods: US images were captured from the gingival margin (GM), alveolar bone crest (ABC), and cementoenamel junction (CEJ) of 108 teeth from fixed human cadavers. These regions were sectioned and scanned to generate reference images. Three parameters were measured: (1) the distance between the ABC and GM, (2) the distance between the ABC and CEJ, and (3) the linear length of the dental calculus on the tooth surface. Three independent examiners performed all measurements twice for reliability analysis.

Results: US images clearly delineated the gingiva, CEJ, alveolar bone, and calculus based on their echogenic characteristics. No statistically significant differences were observed between the US and reference measurements (p > 0.05). Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.78 to 0.97 for intra-rater and 0.92 to 0.96 for inter-rater reliability. Bland-Altman analysis revealed 95% limits of agreement of - 0.27 to 0.94 mm for ABC-GM, - 0.28 to 1.12 mm for ABC-CEJ, and - 0.22 to 0.81 mm for calculus length. These findings confirm that intraoral US reliably represents anatomical structures with high fidelity.

Conclusion: US is a valid, reproducible modality for evaluating ABC, GM, CEJ, and calculus across buccal and lingual surfaces, providing a standardized anatomical foundation.

口腔内超声检查评估人类牙周结构的有效性和可靠性。
目的:口腔内超声检查(US)的最新进展使牙周组织的定量评估成为可能;然而,关于适用的测量地点和结构可视化的限制仍然存在。本研究旨在探讨口腔内超声成像对软硬牙周组织(包括颊、舌腭面和牙石)的解剖准确性和测量的可重复性。方法:采集固定尸体108颗牙齿的龈缘(GM)、牙槽骨嵴(ABC)和牙釉质结(CEJ)的超声图像。对这些区域进行切片和扫描以生成参考图像。测量三个参数:(1)ABC与GM之间的距离,(2)ABC与CEJ之间的距离,(3)牙石在牙表面的线性长度。三名独立的检查员对所有测量进行了两次可靠性分析。结果:超声图像根据其回声特征清晰地描绘了牙龈、CEJ、牙槽骨和牙石。美国和参考测量值之间没有统计学上的显著差异(p < 0.05)。评分者内部的相关系数为0.78至0.97,评分者之间的相关系数为0.92至0.96。Bland-Altman分析显示,ABC-GM的一致性限为- 0.27 ~ 0.94 mm, ABC-CEJ的一致性限为- 0.28 ~ 1.12 mm,微积分长度的一致性限为- 0.22 ~ 0.81 mm。这些发现证实了口腔内US可靠地代表了高保真的解剖结构。结论:US是一种有效的、可重复的评估ABC、GM、CEJ和牙石的方法,提供了标准化的解剖学基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Anatomy is a morphological science which cannot fail to interest the clinician. The practical application of anatomical research to clinical problems necessitates special adaptation and selectivity in choosing from numerous international works. Although there is a tendency to believe that meaningful advances in anatomy are unlikely, constant revision is necessary. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, the first international journal of Clinical anatomy has been created in this spirit. Its goal is to serve clinicians, regardless of speciality-physicians, surgeons, radiologists or other specialists-as an indispensable aid with which they can improve their knowledge of anatomy. Each issue includes: Original papers, review articles, articles on the anatomical bases of medical, surgical and radiological techniques, articles of normal radiologic anatomy, brief reviews of anatomical publications of clinical interest. Particular attention is given to high quality illustrations, which are indispensable for a better understanding of anatomical problems. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy is a journal written by anatomists for clinicians with a special interest in anatomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书