From fragmentation to integration: building a globally harmonised biodosimetry framework for radiological emergency preparedness.

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Rajesh Kumar Chaurasia, Arshad Khan, Balvinder K Sapra
{"title":"From fragmentation to integration: building a globally harmonised biodosimetry framework for radiological emergency preparedness.","authors":"Rajesh Kumar Chaurasia, Arshad Khan, Balvinder K Sapra","doi":"10.1088/1361-6498/ae8afe","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Escalating geopolitical instability and the persistent risk of radiological or nuclear incidents highlight an urgent need for resilient global radiation emergency preparedness. In such crises, rapid and reliable biological dose assessment is indispensable for triage, therapeutic stratification, and long-term health surveillance. While the dicentric chromosome assay remains the gold standard for biodosimetry, its labour-intensive nature, limited throughput, and variability in implementation constrain large-scale responsiveness. Emerging approaches, including DNA-DSB repair foci analysis and G<sub>0</sub>-phase premature chromosome condensation combined with fluorescence<i>in situ</i>hybridisation, offer promising acceleration, yet lack universally harmonised validation frameworks. Despite the existence of regional and international initiatives, global biodosimetry capacity remains fragmented, with heterogeneous protocols, uneven infrastructure, and limited interconnectivity. This commentary contends that isolated excellence is insufficient in the face of potential mass-casualty scenarios that transcend national boundaries. We propose the establishment of a formally integrated global biodosimetry consortium anchored in coordinated interlaboratory comparisons, standardised protocols aligned with IAEA and ISO guidance, shared digital platforms, and sustained training programmes. Modelling suggests that coordinated activation of existing laboratories could increase triage capacity by orders of magnitude compared to isolated national responses. A globally harmonised biodosimetry framework is not merely a technical aspiration; it is a strategic imperative. Integration will enhance scientific rigour, operational scalability, and collective resilience against radiological emergencies of unprecedented scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":50068,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiological Protection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiological Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ae8afe","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Escalating geopolitical instability and the persistent risk of radiological or nuclear incidents highlight an urgent need for resilient global radiation emergency preparedness. In such crises, rapid and reliable biological dose assessment is indispensable for triage, therapeutic stratification, and long-term health surveillance. While the dicentric chromosome assay remains the gold standard for biodosimetry, its labour-intensive nature, limited throughput, and variability in implementation constrain large-scale responsiveness. Emerging approaches, including DNA-DSB repair foci analysis and G0-phase premature chromosome condensation combined with fluorescencein situhybridisation, offer promising acceleration, yet lack universally harmonised validation frameworks. Despite the existence of regional and international initiatives, global biodosimetry capacity remains fragmented, with heterogeneous protocols, uneven infrastructure, and limited interconnectivity. This commentary contends that isolated excellence is insufficient in the face of potential mass-casualty scenarios that transcend national boundaries. We propose the establishment of a formally integrated global biodosimetry consortium anchored in coordinated interlaboratory comparisons, standardised protocols aligned with IAEA and ISO guidance, shared digital platforms, and sustained training programmes. Modelling suggests that coordinated activation of existing laboratories could increase triage capacity by orders of magnitude compared to isolated national responses. A globally harmonised biodosimetry framework is not merely a technical aspiration; it is a strategic imperative. Integration will enhance scientific rigour, operational scalability, and collective resilience against radiological emergencies of unprecedented scale.

从碎片化到一体化:为辐射应急准备建立全球统一的生物剂量学框架。
地缘政治不稳定的加剧以及放射性或核事件的持续风险突出表明,迫切需要有复原力的全球辐射应急准备。在这种危机中,快速可靠的生物剂量评估对于分诊、治疗分层和长期健康监测是必不可少的。虽然双中心染色体测定法仍然是生物剂量测定的金标准,但其劳动密集型、有限的通量和实施中的可变性限制了大规模响应。新兴的方法,包括DNA-DSB修复焦点分析和G 0期过早染色体凝聚结合FISH,提供了有希望的加速,但缺乏普遍统一的验证框架。尽管存在区域和国际倡议,但全球生物剂量测定能力仍然分散,协议异构,基础设施不平衡,互联性有限。这篇评论认为,面对跨越国界的大规模伤亡情况,孤立的卓越是不够的。我们建议建立一个正式整合的全球生物剂量测定联盟,以协调的实验室间比较、符合IAEA和ISO指导的标准化协议、共享的数字平台和持续的培训计划为基础。建模表明,与孤立的国家应对措施相比,协调启动现有实验室可以提高分诊能力的数量级。一个全球统一的生物剂量测定框架不仅仅是一个技术愿望;这是一项战略要务。整合将提高科学的严谨性、操作的可扩展性和应对空前规模的辐射紧急情况的集体应变能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Radiological Protection
Journal of Radiological Protection 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
26.70%
发文量
137
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiological Protection publishes articles on all aspects of radiological protection, including non-ionising as well as ionising radiations. Fields of interest range from research, development and theory to operational matters, education and training. The very wide spectrum of its topics includes: dosimetry, instrument development, specialized measuring techniques, epidemiology, biological effects (in vivo and in vitro) and risk and environmental impact assessments. The journal encourages publication of data and code as well as results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书