Vaccination disparities and structural barriers among current smokers and adults with COPD: implications for comprehensive respiratory prevention.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Ying Zhou, Yang Liu, Yue Ning
{"title":"Vaccination disparities and structural barriers among current smokers and adults with COPD: implications for comprehensive respiratory prevention.","authors":"Ying Zhou, Yang Liu, Yue Ning","doi":"10.1038/s41533-026-00540-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comprehensive respiratory health management for populations with elevated respiratory and lung cancer-related risk remains a guideline-recommended component of comprehensive respiratory prevention, yet uptake has not been systematically characterized. Using vaccination as a sentinel marker of healthcare engagement, we examined 2020-2024 BRFSS data on influenza and pneumococcal vaccination among U.S. adults classified as healthy controls, current smokers without COPD, individuals with COPD who were former or never smokers, and current smokers with COPD. Adults with both current smoking and COPD showed a substantial prevention gap. Despite high clinical vulnerability, this Dual Risk group had lower vaccination uptake than the COPD-only group, particularly among adults aged 45-64 years. In multivariable models, current smoking was associated with attenuation of the expected disease-prompting effect observed among non-smoking individuals with COPD. Mediation analysis suggested that healthcare access barriers, especially absence of a personal healthcare provider and lack of routine checkups, explained much of the vaccination disparity, whereas broader socioeconomic indicators explained less. Although vaccination uptake is not a direct measure of low-dose computed tomography screening, it may serve as a sentinel marker of primary care engagement and missed opportunities for respiratory prevention. Findings should be interpreted cautiously given the cross-sectional design, potential age-related confounding for pneumococcal vaccination under pre-2024 CDC recommendations, and the broader BRFSS smoking definition compared with clinical screening criteria. Integrating vaccination assessment, smoking cessation services, and appropriate screening referral through primary care, pharmacies, and cessation clinics may reduce missed opportunities among high-risk adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-026-00540-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comprehensive respiratory health management for populations with elevated respiratory and lung cancer-related risk remains a guideline-recommended component of comprehensive respiratory prevention, yet uptake has not been systematically characterized. Using vaccination as a sentinel marker of healthcare engagement, we examined 2020-2024 BRFSS data on influenza and pneumococcal vaccination among U.S. adults classified as healthy controls, current smokers without COPD, individuals with COPD who were former or never smokers, and current smokers with COPD. Adults with both current smoking and COPD showed a substantial prevention gap. Despite high clinical vulnerability, this Dual Risk group had lower vaccination uptake than the COPD-only group, particularly among adults aged 45-64 years. In multivariable models, current smoking was associated with attenuation of the expected disease-prompting effect observed among non-smoking individuals with COPD. Mediation analysis suggested that healthcare access barriers, especially absence of a personal healthcare provider and lack of routine checkups, explained much of the vaccination disparity, whereas broader socioeconomic indicators explained less. Although vaccination uptake is not a direct measure of low-dose computed tomography screening, it may serve as a sentinel marker of primary care engagement and missed opportunities for respiratory prevention. Findings should be interpreted cautiously given the cross-sectional design, potential age-related confounding for pneumococcal vaccination under pre-2024 CDC recommendations, and the broader BRFSS smoking definition compared with clinical screening criteria. Integrating vaccination assessment, smoking cessation services, and appropriate screening referral through primary care, pharmacies, and cessation clinics may reduce missed opportunities among high-risk adults.

当前吸烟者和成人慢性阻塞性肺病患者的疫苗接种差异和结构性障碍:对全面呼吸预防的影响
对呼吸系统和肺癌相关风险高的人群进行全面的呼吸健康管理仍然是指南推荐的全面呼吸预防的组成部分,但尚未系统地描述其吸收情况。使用疫苗接种作为医疗保健参与的哨点标记,我们检查了2020-2024年BRFSS数据中美国成年人的流感和肺炎球菌疫苗接种,这些成年人被分类为健康对照组、当前吸烟者、非COPD患者、曾经吸烟者或从未吸烟者、当前吸烟者和COPD患者。目前同时吸烟和慢性阻塞性肺病的成年人在预防方面存在很大差距。尽管临床易感性较高,但该双危组的疫苗接种率低于单纯copd组,尤其是45-64岁的成年人。在多变量模型中,在非吸烟COPD患者中观察到,当前吸烟与预期疾病促进效应的衰减有关。调解分析表明,获得医疗保健的障碍,特别是缺乏个人医疗保健提供者和缺乏常规检查,在很大程度上解释了疫苗接种的差异,而更广泛的社会经济指标解释得较少。虽然接种疫苗并不是低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查的直接指标,但它可以作为初级保健参与和错过呼吸道预防机会的哨点标记。考虑到横断面设计、2024年前CDC建议的肺炎球菌疫苗接种的潜在年龄相关混淆,以及与临床筛查标准相比,BRFSS吸烟定义更广泛,研究结果应谨慎解释。通过初级保健、药房和戒烟诊所整合疫苗接种评估、戒烟服务和适当的筛查转诊,可以减少高危成年人错过的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine is an open access, online-only, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-quality research in all areas of the primary care management of respiratory and respiratory-related allergic diseases. Papers published by the journal represent important advances of significance to specialists within the fields of primary care and respiratory medicine. We are particularly interested in receiving papers in relation to the following aspects of respiratory medicine, respiratory-related allergic diseases and tobacco control: epidemiology prevention clinical care service delivery and organisation of healthcare (including implementation science) global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书