Yoohyun Sim, Na-Yeon Ha, Seok-Jae Ko, Jae-Woo Park, Jinsung Kim
{"title":"Comparative Study of Clinical Characteristics According to Pain Distribution in Lingual Burning Mouth Syndrome","authors":"Yoohyun Sim, Na-Yeon Ha, Seok-Jae Ko, Jae-Woo Park, Jinsung Kim","doi":"10.1111/joor.70269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The pathophysiology of burning mouth syndrome (BMS) remains unclear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To compare the clinical characteristics of patients with lingual BMS according to pain distribution.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The medical records of patients with lingual BMS who visited the oral clinic of Kyung Hee University Korean Medicine Hospital between January 2023 and December 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were classified according to tongue pain distribution as follows: laterality (unilateral vs. bilateral), extent (localised vs. generalised) and central tongue involvement (non-central vs. central involvement). Group differences and associations among clinical characteristics, including pain intensity (visual analog scale [VAS]), quality of life, salivary flow and taste disturbance, were assessed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 256 patients were included. Patients with bilateral pain showed significantly higher pain intensity than those with unilateral pain. Patients with generalised pain reported significantly higher pain intensity than those with localised pain. Patients with central involvement showed significantly higher pain intensity than those with non-central involvement. Pain intensity was negatively associated with quality of life in most subgroups, except the unilateral subgroup. Taste disturbance was associated with clinically significant pain (VAS ≥ 4) in the unilateral and localised subgroups, whereas reduced salivary flow was associated with clinically significant pain in the central involvement subgroup.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Pain distribution may help identify clinical subtypes of lingual BMS and support individualised assessment. Herein, pain distribution was associated with differences in pain intensity, quality of life, taste disturbance and salivary flow, underscoring the heterogeneous and multifactorial pathophysiology of lingual BMS and the need for tailored management.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":"53 11","pages":"2150-2157"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joor.70269","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joor.70269","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The pathophysiology of burning mouth syndrome (BMS) remains unclear.
Objectives
To compare the clinical characteristics of patients with lingual BMS according to pain distribution.
Methods
The medical records of patients with lingual BMS who visited the oral clinic of Kyung Hee University Korean Medicine Hospital between January 2023 and December 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were classified according to tongue pain distribution as follows: laterality (unilateral vs. bilateral), extent (localised vs. generalised) and central tongue involvement (non-central vs. central involvement). Group differences and associations among clinical characteristics, including pain intensity (visual analog scale [VAS]), quality of life, salivary flow and taste disturbance, were assessed.
Results
In total, 256 patients were included. Patients with bilateral pain showed significantly higher pain intensity than those with unilateral pain. Patients with generalised pain reported significantly higher pain intensity than those with localised pain. Patients with central involvement showed significantly higher pain intensity than those with non-central involvement. Pain intensity was negatively associated with quality of life in most subgroups, except the unilateral subgroup. Taste disturbance was associated with clinically significant pain (VAS ≥ 4) in the unilateral and localised subgroups, whereas reduced salivary flow was associated with clinically significant pain in the central involvement subgroup.
Conclusions
Pain distribution may help identify clinical subtypes of lingual BMS and support individualised assessment. Herein, pain distribution was associated with differences in pain intensity, quality of life, taste disturbance and salivary flow, underscoring the heterogeneous and multifactorial pathophysiology of lingual BMS and the need for tailored management.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function.
Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology.
The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.